01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Sampdoria or draw (1X)66%
- Under 3.5 goals76%
Serie BStadio Luigi Ferraris, Genova21°1,8 mm9 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
TEXT: Since 2023, Sampdoria and Catanzaro have faced off four times, each encounter concluding in a draw. While a small sample, it suggests an intriguing balance that contrasts with recent form. Currently, Catanzaro is reeling from three consecutive losses, which weighs heavily against them as they prepare to face a Sampdoria side with a slight statistical edge.
Sampdoria holds a modest advantage in expected goals (xG) and expected points (xPoints). With 1.29 xG compared to Catanzaro’s 1.21, and outperforming them in xPoints (3.9 to 2.7), the hosts appear better positioned to capitalize on their opportunities. Moreover, Sampdoria’s xGA per match stands at 1.1, markedly superior to Catanzaro’s leaky defense allowing 1.7 xGA per match. This suggests Sampdoria may edge out their visitors defensively.
The expected goals model reflects a tight contest, with the most likely outcome being a 1-1 draw at 13%. Yet, Sampdoria’s possession and high press style could exploit Catanzaro’s counter-attack and crossing strategy, especially given the latter’s current slump. Though the odds of a 1-0 win for either side rest at 10%, the home advantage could tip the balance in Sampdoria’s favor.
The model gives Sampdoria a 39% win probability, identifying them as the lean in this matchup. Although the over 2.5 goals prediction hovers just below the halfway mark at 46%, the slight lean remains with the under, considering both teams to score is priced at 51%. Thus, the most compelling betting angle points toward backing Sampdoria, supported by their defensive solidity against a struggling Catanzaro.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Serie B data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Sampdoria | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 0 |
| xPoints | 3.9 | 2.7 |
| xG per match | 1.2 | 1 |
| xGA per match | 1.1 | 1.7 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.26 | 0.17 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.16 | 0.29 |
| Playing style | Sampdoria | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.75 | 0.52 |
| xT per match | 0.92 | 0.98 |
| xTA per match | 0.62 | 1.4 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 28 | 20 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.21 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.3 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.27 | 0.21 |
| Entries into the box per match | 19 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 9 | 14 |
| Pass completion % | 0.77 | 0.81 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.69 | 0.76 |
| Passes per match | 395 | 391 |
| Passes against per match | 332 | 312 |
| Switches of play per match | 26 | 25.2 |
| Long balls per match | 30 | 28 |
| Set pieces | Sampdoria | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| Corners per match | 6.3 | 6.4 |
| Corners against per match | 3 | 6.4 |
| xG per corner | 0 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.39 | 0.37 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.56 | 0.63 |
| Other | Sampdoria | Catanzaro |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Peter Vindahl Jensen (Sampdoria) | Mirko Pigliacelli (Catanzaro) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 8 | 14 |
| Save % | 57% | 67% |
| xG prevented | 34% | 56% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Sampdoria a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Sampdoria 39%, draw 30%, Catanzaro 31%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 46% and under at 54%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.