Serie BStadio Marcantonio Bentegodi, Verona28°17 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Hellas VeronaHellas VeronaPossession control
    50
    ArezzoArezzoPossession control
    The model's lean: 2 · Arezzo (41%)

    Hellas VeronaArezzo · Serie B

    1 · Hellas Verona 34%X 24%41% Arezzo · 2

    Analysis: Hellas VeronaArezzo

    Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work

    A razor-thin balance of power defines the clash between Hellas Verona and Arezzo in Serie B, with both teams employing a possession control style that suggests a midfield battle. The model slightly favors Arezzo with a 41% probability of winning, while Verona lags behind at 34%. The most probable outcomes—1-1, 0-1, or 1-0—highlight the closeness in the odds, with the expected goals nearly identical: Verona at 1.32 and Arezzo at 1.36. In a game where precision could tip the scales, expect a strategic tug-of-war rather than an open, high-scoring encounter.

    Verona's numbers tell a conflicting story. Despite sitting on just one point, their underlying metrics are impressive. With an xPoints of 4.1 and xG of 2.5 per match, they outperform Arezzo, who have 3.0 xPoints and 1.5 xG. Defensively, Verona's solidity is underscored by an xGA of just 0.94 per match compared to Arezzo's 1.5. These figures suggest Verona could be closer to form correction than the table shows, a factor often overlooked by surface-level interpretations.

    Yet, Arezzo's edge in actual points presents a tangible counter-narrative. They have taken three points from their chances, indicating efficiency that Verona has lacked. The betting market has perhaps underestimated Arezzo's potential to exploit such situations, offering lucrative odds. With Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet all listing Arezzo at 4.7, against a model-rated probability of 41%, the value is undeniable.

    Expect a tightly contested affair where a single goal could decide the outcome. The match may well finish as a 1-1 draw, aligning with the model's most likely scoreline. However, given the EV+, backing Arezzo to capitalize on their efficiency at 4.7 odds could be a calculated risk with substantial upside.

    Hellas VeronaHellas Verona
    Form LD
    League ranking xG #1xGA #7xT #4xP/match #2Points #14
    Key players
    • Amin SarrLWxG 0.60 · xT 0.17
    • Domagoj BradarićLWBxG 0.09 · xT 0.27
    • Andréa Paul LeborgneCDMxG 0.10 · xT 0.22
    ArezzoArezzo
    Form WL
    League ranking xG #7xGA #16xT #7xP/match #10Points #12
    Key players
    • Pietro CianciFxG 0.73 · xT 0.06
    • Camillo TavernelliLWxG 0.14 · xT 0.28
    • Alessandro ArenaRWxG 0.17 · xT 0.14
    Final score
    50
    The model missed the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Hellas Verona 34% · Draw 24% · Arezzo 41%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - ArezzoBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 13,49fair 10,24+32 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - VeronaBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 6,31fair 10,94-42 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: Hellas VeronaArezzo

    Predicted score matrix

    Arezzo
    Hellas Verona
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.2%
    0–19.0%
    0–26.4%
    0–32.9%
    0–4+1.3%
    1
    1–08.6%
    1–112.7%
    1–28.4%
    1–33.8%
    1–4+1.8%
    2
    2–05.9%
    2–18.1%
    2–25.5%
    2–32.5%
    2–4+1.2%
    3
    3–02.6%
    3–13.6%
    3–22.4%
    3–31.1%
    3–4+0.5%
    4+
    4+–01.2%
    4+–11.6%
    4+–21.1%
    4+–30.5%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.0-19%
    3. 3.1-09%
    4. 4.1-28%
    5. 5.2-18%
    Expected goals
    1,321,36
    Both teams to score
    55%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,7
    Under 2,550%
    @1.85
    Over 2,550%
    @2.03EV+2%

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Arezzo or draw (X2)64%
    • Under 3.5 goals72%

    Combined probability

    46%

    Fair odds

    2.15

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Arezzo or draw (X2)64%
    • Over 2.5 goals50%
    • Pietro Cianci to score18%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score55%
    • Over 2.5 goals50%
    • Gift Emmanuel Orban to score21%
    • Gennaro Iaccarino to be booked23%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Arezzo41% probability@4.60PinnacleEV+90%reference odds
    • 2 · Arezzo41% probability@4.00BetsafeEV+65%reference odds
    • 2 · Arezzo41% probability@4.00BetssonEV+65%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Hellas VeronaX2 · Arezzo
    Betsafe1.853.30
    EV+ 65%
    4.00
    Betsson1.853.30
    EV+ 65%
    4.00
    Nordicbet1.853.30
    EV+ 65%
    4.00
    Pinnacle1.933.31
    EV+ 90%
    4.60

    Odds updated 6 Sept, 11:36

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards the draw since 31 August — the odds have shortened from 3.77 to 3.31 (−12%).

    1+13 %
    58 %48 %

    1.701.93

    X-12 %
    32 %22 %

    3.773.31

    2-6 %
    24 %14 %

    4.904.60

    Over 2,5+4 %
    53 %43 %

    1.942.03

    Pinnacle · 14 recorded price levels · 31/08/2026 → 06/09/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Hellas Verona
    Arezzo
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Hellas Verona (23)
    Arezzo (44)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Hellas Verona
    Andrias Edmundsson: 85 passningar, xT 0.14EdmundssonDomagoj Bradarić: 82 passningar, xT 0.49BradarićAntoine Bernede: 61 passningar, xT 0.4BernedeAndréa Paul Leborgne: 57 passningar, xT 0.39LeborgneNicola Leali: 51 passningar, xT 0.02LealiPawel Dawidowicz: 47 passningar, xT 0.07DawidowiczGabriele Zappa: 39 passningar, xT 0.07ZappaGrigoris Kastanos: 39 passningar, xT 0.11KastanosAmin Sarr: 38 passningar, xT 0.27SarrSeid Korač: 38 passningar, xT 0.03KoračAbdoulrahmane Harroui: 36 passningar, xT -0.04Harroui
    Arezzo
    Matteo Gilli: 77 passningar, xT 0.17GilliJulian Illanes: 76 passningar, xT 0.08IllanesSamuele Righetti: 76 passningar, xT 0.58RighettiGennaro Iaccarino: 71 passningar, xT 0.1IaccarinoCamillo Tavernelli: 56 passningar, xT 0.57TavernelliAlessandro Renzi: 46 passningar, xT 0.13RenziMattia Sala: 45 passningar, xT 0.03SalaArtur Ioniţă: 43 passningar, xT 0.17IoniţăAlessandro Arena: 32 passningar, xT 0.22ArenaAlessandro Nunziante: 32 passningar, xT 0.11NunziantePietro Cianci: 18 passningar, xT 0.04Cianci
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Hellas Verona
    Andrias Edmundsson: 85 passningar, xT 0.14EdmundssonDomagoj Bradarić: 82 passningar, xT 0.49BradarićAntoine Bernede: 61 passningar, xT 0.4BernedeAndréa Paul Leborgne: 57 passningar, xT 0.39LeborgneNicola Leali: 51 passningar, xT 0.02LealiPawel Dawidowicz: 47 passningar, xT 0.07DawidowiczGabriele Zappa: 39 passningar, xT 0.07ZappaGrigoris Kastanos: 39 passningar, xT 0.11KastanosAmin Sarr: 38 passningar, xT 0.27SarrSeid Korač: 38 passningar, xT 0.03KoračAbdoulrahmane Harroui: 36 passningar, xT -0.04Harroui
    Arezzo
    Matteo Gilli: 77 passningar, xT 0.17GilliJulian Illanes: 76 passningar, xT 0.08IllanesSamuele Righetti: 76 passningar, xT 0.58RighettiGennaro Iaccarino: 71 passningar, xT 0.1IaccarinoCamillo Tavernelli: 56 passningar, xT 0.57TavernelliAlessandro Renzi: 46 passningar, xT 0.13RenziMattia Sala: 45 passningar, xT 0.03SalaArtur Ioniţă: 43 passningar, xT 0.17IoniţăAlessandro Arena: 32 passningar, xT 0.22ArenaAlessandro Nunziante: 32 passningar, xT 0.11NunziantePietro Cianci: 18 passningar, xT 0.04Cianci

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceHellas VeronaArezzo
    Points13
    xPoints4.13
    xG per match2.51.5
    xGA per match0.941.5
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.360.31
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.370.12
    Playing styleHellas VeronaArezzo
    Build-up efficiency0.330.41
    Field tilt0.590.49
    xT per match1.41.1
    xTA per match0.511.1
    Won balls, offensive half3015
    Pressing intensity0.230.23
    Pressing efficiency0.310.28
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.230.16
    Entries into the box per match1411
    Entries into the box against1014
    Pass completion %0.760.76
    Pass completion % under pressure0.710.66
    Passes per match361293
    Passes against per match301428
    Switches of play per match30.540.3
    Long balls per match3450
    Set piecesHellas VeronaArezzo
    xG from free kicks0.030
    Corners per match5.65.4
    Corners against per match2.53.9
    xG per corner0.040.01
    xGA per corner against0.050
    First touch, offensive corners %0.180.36
    First touch, defensive corners %0.40.88
    OtherHellas VeronaArezzo
    Throw-in control0.760.76
    The goalkeepersNicola Leali (Hellas Verona)Alessandro Nunziante (Arezzo)
    Saves55
    Save %71%56%
    xG prevented70%47%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Hellas Verona vs Arezzo according to our model?

    The model gives Arezzo a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Hellas Verona 34%, draw 24%, Arezzo 41%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.