01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Virtus Entella or draw (1X)63%
- Under 3.5 goals74%
Serie BStadio Comunale, Chiavari
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
FAKTA-CHECK RESULT:
The text contains a factual error regarding expected goals. The FACTS state Virtus Entella's expected goals are 1.28 and Cesena's are 1.32, meaning Cesena has the higher expected goals — not Entella. The text incorrectly states "Entella edges it at 1.28 to Cesena's 1.32," which reverses the comparison.
CORRECTED TEXT:
With just two previous encounters since 2023, the head-to-head record between Virtus Entella and Cesena is sparse. Yet, it's the form and numbers that provide a clearer lens here. Entella has the slight edge according to model probabilities, but Cesena's direct style poses an intriguing challenge to the hosts' possession game. This clash of tactics might just tip the balance in a game where small margins are likely to count.
Looking at expected goals, Cesena edges it at 1.32 to Entella's 1.28, suggesting a more balanced match than raw numbers might imply. Despite Cesena's lower xG per match at 0.67, their knack for direct play could exploit any high press vulnerabilities in Entella's setup. On the defensive side, Entella's xGA at just 0.57 per match suggests a stout rear guard, which could be crucial against Cesena's counterattacking threat.
The model's most likely scoreline of 1-1 paints a picture of a tight affair, yet with Cesena's edge in direct play and Entella's high defensive metrics, a 1-0 result either way isn't far-fetched. The over/under line at 48% indicates a slight lean towards a lower-scoring encounter, though both teams to score sits at a more optimistic 53%.
Despite Entella's statistical advantages, the real value lies with Cesena being priced at odds of 3.2 across Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet. With the model giving them a 32% chance, there's a modest 2% edge—an opportunity for those seeking value in a closely matched duel. It's a gamble on whether Cesena will capitalize on their direct style to snatch a narrow victory.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Virtus Entella | X | 2 · Cesena |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.12 | 3.05 | EV+ 9% 3.40 |
| Betsson | 2.12 | 3.05 | EV+ 9% 3.40 |
| Nordicbet | 2.12 | 3.05 | EV+ 9% 3.40 |
| Pinnacle | 2.22 | 3.15 | EV+ 18% 3.69 |
Odds updated 29 Aug, 11:37
2.18 → 2.22
3.34 → 3.15
3.38 → 3.69
2.10 → 2.22
Pinnacle · 10 recorded price levels · 24/08/2026 → 29/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Serie B data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Virtus Entella | Cesena |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0 | 1 |
| xPoints | 1.2 | 1.5 |
| xG per match | 0.87 | 0.67 |
| xGA per match | 0.57 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.1 | 0.04 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Playing style | Virtus Entella | Cesena |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.82 | 0.18 |
| xT per match | 1.4 | 0.41 |
| xTA per match | 0.46 | 0.9 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 38 | 10 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.21 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.29 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.29 | 0.18 |
| Entries into the box per match | 17 | 5 |
| Entries into the box against | 3 | 23 |
| Pass completion % | 0.74 | 0.73 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.62 | 0.69 |
| Passes per match | 332 | 238 |
| Passes against per match | 318 | 475 |
| Switches of play per match | 25 | 17.4 |
| Long balls per match | 23 | 19 |
| Set pieces | Virtus Entella | Cesena |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.09 | 0.19 |
| Corners per match | 4.8 | 0 |
| Corners against per match | 0.96 | 12.3 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0 |
| xGA per corner against | 0 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.6 | 0 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 1 | 0.55 |
| Other | Virtus Entella | Cesena |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.69 | 0.8 |
| The goalkeepers | Federico Del Frate (Virtus Entella) | Alessandro Siano (Cesena) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 1 | 8 |
| Save % | 50% | 89% |
| xG prevented | 43% | 70% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Virtus Entella a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Virtus Entella 39%, draw 29%, Cesena 32%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 48% and under at 52%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 53% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.