J1 League22°17,4 mm10 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Mito HollyhockMito HollyhockBalanced & physical
    vs
    Kawasaki FrontaleKawasaki FrontaleBalanced & physical
    The model's lean: 2 · Kawasaki Frontale (40%)Best value by the model: 1 · Mito Hollyhock @ 3.46 (+14 %)

    Mito Hollyhock – Kawasaki Frontale · J1 League

    1 · Mito Hollyhock 33%X 27%40% Kawasaki Frontale · 2

    Analysis: Mito Hollyhock – Kawasaki Frontale

    Anna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work

    A curious tension lies in the numbers as Mito Hollyhock host Kawasaki Frontale. Both teams embrace a balanced and physical style, but the model leans slightly towards the visitors with a 40% win probability. Despite this, the hosts have carved out a five-match unbeaten streak in the league, suggesting a resilience that could tilt the odds.

    The expected goals (xG) offer a nuanced view. Kawasaki Frontale edges the attacking stats with an xG of 1.67 compared to Mito's 1.35, reflecting their strength in creating opportunities. Yet, the defensive metrics are close, with Mito Hollyhock showing a slightly higher xGA, suggesting fragility at the back. This aligns with their style, which may struggle against Kawasaki's sharper attacking edge, particularly within eight seconds of winning possession.

    Scoreline predictions narrow the focus: 1-1 leads at 11%, followed by 1-2 at 9%. Both teams are likely to find the net, supported by a 60% chance for both teams to score and a notable 58% for over 2.5 goals. The forecasted rain, however, could dampen attacking prowess, subtly suppressing the goal count, though this is already factored into the model.

    In betting terms, the sharpest angle might lie in the home side's odds. With value (EV+) identified at 3.3 across several bookmakers, Mito Hollyhock presents a tempting proposition for those eyeing a potential upset. Though Kawasaki Frontale retains a slim edge, the combination of a resilient Mito side and attractive odds makes the home win a compelling, if risky, punt.

    Mito HollyhockMito Hollyhock
    Form DWDWD
    League ranking xG #10xGA #13xT #17xP/match #7Points #11
    Key players
    • Kotaro UchinoFxG 0.30 · xT -0.05
    • Sho OmoriLBxG 0.00 · xT 0.16
    • Takumi MaseRWBxG 0.13 · xT 0.16
    Kawasaki FrontaleKawasaki Frontale
    Form DDWLW
    League ranking xG #6xGA #10xT #10xP/match #8Points #12
    Key players
    • Yasuto WakizakaCAMxG 0.26 · xT 0.13
    • Yuki YamamotoCMxG 0.06 · xT 0.17
    • Tatsuya ItoRWxG 0.33 · xT 0.16

    Match prediction: Mito Hollyhock – Kawasaki Frontale

    Predicted score matrix

    Kawasaki Frontale →
    Mito Hollyhock →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–05.2%
    0–17.9%
    0–26.8%
    0–33.8%
    0–4+2.3%
    1
    1–06.3%
    1–111.3%
    1–29.2%
    1–35.1%
    1–4+3.1%
    2
    2–04.5%
    2–17.4%
    2–26.2%
    2–33.4%
    2–4+2.1%
    3
    3–02.0%
    3–13.3%
    3–22.8%
    3–31.5%
    3–4+0.9%
    4+
    4+–00.9%
    4+–11.5%
    4+–21.3%
    4+–30.7%
    4+–4+0.4%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.1-29%
    3. 3.0-18%
    4. 4.2-17%
    5. 5.0-27%
    Expected goals
    1,35–1,67
    Both teams to score
    60%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,0
    Under 2,542%
    @2.20
    Over 2,558%
    @1.60

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Kawasaki Frontale or draw (X2)69%
    • Over 1.5 goals81%

    Combined probability

    56%

    Fair odds

    1.78

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Kawasaki Frontale or draw (X2)69%
    • Over 2.5 goals58%
    • Tatsuya Ito to score26%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score60%
    • Over 2.5 goals58%
    • Tatsuya Ito to score26%
    • Yu Funabashi to be booked19%

    Combined probability

    –

    Fair odds

    –

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · Mito Hollyhock33% probability@3.46PinnacleEV+14%reference odds
    • 1 · Mito Hollyhock33% probability@3.30BetsafeEV+9%reference odds
    • 1 · Mito Hollyhock33% probability@3.30BetssonEV+9%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Mito HollyhockX2 · Kawasaki Frontale
    Betsafe
    EV+ 9%
    3.30    		3.452.02
    Betsson
    EV+ 9%
    3.30    		3.452.02
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 9%
    3.30    		3.452.02
    Pinnacle
    EV+ 14%
    3.46
    EV+ 2%
    3.82    		2.02

    Odds updated 11 Sept, 14:29

    Odds movement

    1+10 %
    31 %26 %

    3.14 → 3.46

    X+2 %
    28 %23 %

    3.76 → 3.82

    2-5 %
    49 %44 %

    2.12 → 2.02

    Pinnacle · 9 recorded price levels · 06/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Key facts

    • Mito Hollyhock are unbeaten in their last 5 league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Mito Hollyhock
    Kawasaki Frontale
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Mito Hollyhock (11–8)
    Kawasaki Frontale (12–9)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Mito Hollyhock
    Yasuki Kimoto: 179 passningar, xT 0.36KimotoSho Omori: 174 passningar, xT 0.71OmoriTaishi Semba: 158 passningar, xT 0.22SembaKonosuke Nishikawa: 130 passningar, xT 0.22NishikawaTakumi Mase: 125 passningar, xT 0.45MaseYu Funabashi: 122 passningar, xT 0.19FunabashiKenta Itakura: 114 passningar, xT 0.04ItakuraAkinari Kawazura: 87 passningar, xT 0.08KawazuraKaito Taniguchi: 71 passningar, xT 0.34TaniguchiYoshiki Torikai: 69 passningar, xT 0.61TorikaiArata Watanabe: 62 passningar, xT 0.03Watanabe
    Kawasaki Frontale
    Yuki Yamamoto: 297 passningar, xT 0.65YamamotoKento Tachibanada: 221 passningar, xT 0.1TachibanadaHiroto Taniguchi: 197 passningar, xT 0.26TaniguchiReon Yamahara: 174 passningar, xT 0.44YamaharaYasuto Wakizaka: 173 passningar, xT 0.36WakizakaPedro Henrique Oliveira Romano: 159 passningar, xT 0.34RomanoAsahi Sasaki: 123 passningar, xT 0.61SasakiTatsuya Ito: 109 passningar, xT 0.35ItoSvend Arvid Stanislaw Brodersen: 99 passningar, xT 0.08BrodersenSota Miura: 88 passningar, xT 0.25MiuraMárcio Augusto da Silva Barbosa: 67 passningar, xT 0Barbosa
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Mito Hollyhock
    Yasuki Kimoto: 179 passningar, xT 0.36KimotoSho Omori: 174 passningar, xT 0.71OmoriTaishi Semba: 158 passningar, xT 0.22SembaKonosuke Nishikawa: 130 passningar, xT 0.22NishikawaTakumi Mase: 125 passningar, xT 0.45MaseYu Funabashi: 122 passningar, xT 0.19FunabashiKenta Itakura: 114 passningar, xT 0.04ItakuraAkinari Kawazura: 87 passningar, xT 0.08KawazuraKaito Taniguchi: 71 passningar, xT 0.34TaniguchiYoshiki Torikai: 69 passningar, xT 0.61TorikaiArata Watanabe: 62 passningar, xT 0.03Watanabe
    Kawasaki Frontale
    Yuki Yamamoto: 297 passningar, xT 0.65YamamotoKento Tachibanada: 221 passningar, xT 0.1TachibanadaHiroto Taniguchi: 197 passningar, xT 0.26TaniguchiReon Yamahara: 174 passningar, xT 0.44YamaharaYasuto Wakizaka: 173 passningar, xT 0.36WakizakaPedro Henrique Oliveira Romano: 159 passningar, xT 0.34RomanoAsahi Sasaki: 123 passningar, xT 0.61SasakiTatsuya Ito: 109 passningar, xT 0.35ItoSvend Arvid Stanislaw Brodersen: 99 passningar, xT 0.08BrodersenSota Miura: 88 passningar, xT 0.25MiuraMárcio Augusto da Silva Barbosa: 67 passningar, xT 0Barbosa

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceMito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
    Points99
    xPoints9.18.8
    xG per match1.41.6
    xGA per match1.61.5
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.280.38
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.220.33
    Playing styleMito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
    Build-up efficiency0.330.32
    Field tilt0.260.59
    xT per match0.761
    xTA per match1.41.2
    Won balls, offensive half2219
    Pressing intensity0.240.23
    Pressing efficiency0.250.27
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.270.23
    Entries into the box per match1016
    Entries into the box against1715
    Pass completion %0.750.79
    Pass completion % under pressure0.750.74
    Passes per match309416
    Passes against per match520354
    Switches of play per match22.419.7
    Long balls per match2922
    Set piecesMito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
    xG from free kicks0.080.01
    Corners per match4.74.6
    Corners against per match3.73.8
    xG per corner0.040.01
    xGA per corner against0.030.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.430.46
    First touch, defensive corners %0.50.43
    OtherMito HollyhockKawasaki Frontale
    Throw-in control0.70.68
    The goalkeepersKonosuke Nishikawa (Mito Hollyhock)Svend Arvid Stanislaw Brodersen (Kawasaki Frontale)
    Saves2127
    Save %72%75%
    xG prevented53%41%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Mito Hollyhock
    Fixtures, form & tips
    Kawasaki Frontale
    Fixtures, form & tips

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Mito Hollyhock vs Kawasaki Frontale according to our model?

    The model gives Kawasaki Frontale a 40% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Mito Hollyhock 33%, draw 27%, Kawasaki Frontale 40%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 58% and under at 42%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Yokohama F. MarinosYokohama F. Marinos
    3–4
    Kashima AntlersKashima Antlers
    1 25%X 30%2 45%
    The model called the outcome
    Gamba OsakaGamba Osaka
    4–3
    Urawa RedsUrawa Reds
    1 38%X 26%2 36%
    The model called the outcome
    Nagoya GrampusNagoya Grampus
    0–1
    Shimizu S-PulseShimizu S-Pulse
    1 43%X 27%2 30%
    The model missed the outcome

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.