01 · 2 legs
Safe
- CD Guadalajara to win60%
- Over 1.5 goals80%
Liga MXEstadio Akron, Guadalajara19°6,1 mm13 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
TEXT: The 60% win probability for CD Guadalajara underlines their commanding form, unbeaten in six league matches. This statistical edge is reinforced by their expected goal tally of 1.86, which dwarfs Pumas UNAM's 1.11. The hosts are not only superior in points but also lead on expected points and goals per match. Although the recent head-to-head sample is small—four games since 2023—it still tilts in Guadalajara's favor with two wins and two draws.
Pumas UNAM's possession control could struggle against Guadalajara's high press, especially with the rain potentially slowing down the play. While both teams show a 57% chance of scoring, Guadalajara's tactical approach and current streak suggest they have the upper hand. The likelihood of over 2.5 goals at 57% aligns with the model's expectation of a higher-scoring affair, despite the potential dampening effect of the weather.
With a model lean towards Guadalajara and the metrics heavily skewed in their favor, a 2-1 victory for the home side seems plausible. The matchup's nuances and Guadalajara's tactical superiority strongly support backing the hosts in this contest.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · CD Guadalajara | X | 2 · Pumas UNAM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 1.55 | 4.00 | 5.50 |
| Betfair Exchange | 1.10 | 1.11 | 1.10 |
| Betsafe | 1.50 | 4.05 | EV+ 5% 5.90 |
| Betsson | 1.50 | 4.05 | EV+ 5% 5.90 |
| Nordicbet | 1.50 | 4.05 | EV+ 5% 5.90 |
| Pinnacle | 1.51 | 4.43 | EV+ 4% 5.84 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 16:11
Head-to-head based on Liga MX data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | CD Guadalajara | Pumas UNAM |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 14 | 8 |
| xPoints | 9.2 | 6.9 |
| xG per match | 1.4 | 1 |
| xGA per match | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.14 | 0.19 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.24 | 0.14 |
| Playing style | CD Guadalajara | Pumas UNAM |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.64 | 0.46 |
| xT per match | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 0.79 | 0.99 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 26 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.24 | 0.3 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.24 | 0.26 |
| Entries into the box per match | 19 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 10 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.83 | 0.77 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.78 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 512 | 374 |
| Passes against per match | 344 | 368 |
| Switches of play per match | 28.1 | 31.8 |
| Long balls per match | 31 | 35 |
| Set pieces | CD Guadalajara | Pumas UNAM |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| Corners per match | 7.9 | 5 |
| Corners against per match | 3.6 | 3.9 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.6 | 0.33 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.32 | 0.61 |
| Other | CD Guadalajara | Pumas UNAM |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.68 | 0.66 |
| The goalkeepers | Raul Rangel (CD Guadalajara) | Keylor Antonio Navas Gamboa (Pumas UNAM) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 23 | 15 |
| Save % | 79% | 65% |
| xG prevented | 38% | 37% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives CD Guadalajara a 60% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: CD Guadalajara 60%, draw 23%, Pumas UNAM 18%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 57% and under at 43%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 57% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.