01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance KFUM or draw (X2)65%
- Under 3.5 goals76%
Norwegian Eliteserien18°0,4 mm21 km/h
Läs på svenskaMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
Start's direct style meets KFUM's balanced approach in what promises to be a tightly contested affair, underscored by the razor-thin model probabilities. While Start has been struggling with points this season, their expected points suggest they’ve been somewhat unlucky, hinting at potential underperformance relative to their xG of 1.4 per match. This figure indicates that Start has the capacity to create chances, though not always capitalizing on them. Meanwhile, KFUM, while boasting a slightly better points tally, has a lower xG of 1.0, suggesting potential inefficiency in front of goal despite their physical play.
Given the small sample size of head-to-head encounters — just one match since 2021 which KFUM narrowly won — it weighs less on the analysis than current form and expected goals statistics. Start's defensive vulnerabilities, as highlighted by their xGA of 1.6, mirror those of KFUM, which could open doors for each side. However, the expected rain of 8.8 mm might suppress goal-scoring opportunities, a factor already considered in the model's numbers.
The model reflects a slim lean towards KFUM with a 35% win probability, yet the most likely scoreline is a 1-1 draw, occurring 13% of the time. The expected goals are almost evenly matched, indicating a balanced game where neither side is likely to dominate. As the odds suggest, the under 2.5 goals bet presents a compelling opportunity. With a model rating of 55% and odds of 2.15 at Betsson, it offers an 18% edge, making it a valuable angle for bettors to consider, especially with weather conditions potentially disrupting play.
In a battle that promises a close contest determined by fine margins, bettors might profitably lean on the under 2.5 goals market. With factors such as weather potentially contributing to a low-scoring game, the numbers make a persuasive case for this bet, especially given the offered value.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Start | X | 2 · KFUM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.68 | EV+ 7% 3.50 | 2.52 |
| Betsson | 2.25 | EV+ 11% 3.65 | EV+ 10% 3.10 |
| Nordicbet | 2.70 | EV+ 8% 3.55 | 2.55 |
| Paddy Power | 2.50 | EV+ 4% 3.40 | 2.45 |
| Pinnacle | 2.18 | EV+ 15% 3.78 | EV+ 16% 3.27 |
Odds updated 30 Aug, 05:14
2.28 → 2.18
3.62 → 3.78
2.99 → 3.27
1.75 → 1.70
Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 21/08/2026 → 30/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Eliteserien data since 2021.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Start | KFUM |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 10 | 19 |
| xPoints | 22.8 | 20.4 |
| xG per match | 1.4 | 1 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.31 | 0.19 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.32 | 0.23 |
| Playing style | Start | KFUM |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.35 |
| Field tilt | 0.32 | 0.41 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 0.97 |
| xTA per match | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 27 | 23 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.25 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.28 | 0.26 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 17 | 17 |
| Pass completion % | 0.69 | 0.73 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.65 | 0.71 |
| Passes per match | 277 | 332 |
| Passes against per match | 423 | 434 |
| Switches of play per match | 22.3 | 18.5 |
| Long balls per match | 37 | 28 |
| Set pieces | Start | KFUM |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.08 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 3.8 | 4 |
| Corners against per match | 5.1 | 5 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.07 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.42 | 0.33 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.59 | 0.56 |
| Other | Start | KFUM |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.68 | 0.73 |
| The goalkeepers | Jacob Pryts (Start) | Emil Ødegaard (KFUM) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 40 | 25 |
| Save % | 52% | 74% |
| xG prevented | 29% | 54% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives KFUM a 35% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Start 34%, draw 30%, KFUM 35%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 45% and under at 55%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.