01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Radomiak Radom or draw (1X)57%
- Over 1.5 goals84%
Ekstraklasa15°11,0 mm9 km/h
Läs på svenska
Radomiak RadomCounter-attacks & crossesErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
The 63% probability for over 2.5 goals stands out in the matchup between Radomiak Radom and Piast Gliwice, hinting at a game that might defy the expected defensive postures. While the model slightly favors the hosts with a 41% chance of victory, the 33% for the visitors suggests a tightly contested affair. The expected goals, with Radomiak at 1.51 and Piast at 1.75, indicate potential scoring opportunities on both ends.
Piast Gliwice's physical style could disrupt Radomiak Radom's counter-attacking game, but both teams are likely to find the net, supported by a 65% chance for both teams to score. The head-to-head record is limited to four matches, with Radomiak Radom holding 1 win, 2 draws, and 1 loss, giving us little definitive insight. Instead, Radomiak's slight edge in expected points (9.0 vs. Piast’s 7.5) and higher xG per match (1.5 vs. 1.2) hint at a mild advantage.
Given the projected weather conditions—14.8°C with 11.0 mm of rain—the over 2.5 goals line could offer value despite the dampening effect rain might have on goal frequency. However, the model's lean toward Radomiak adds complexity, suggesting a possible scoreline of 2-1 in their favor.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Radomiak Radom | X | 2 · Piast Gliwice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | 2.37 | 3.51 | 2.84 |
Odds updated 9 Sept, 05:12
2.35 → 2.37
3.50 → 3.51
2.88 → 2.84
1.67 → 1.67
Pinnacle · 2 recorded price levels · 08/09/2026 → 09/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Ekstraklasa data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Radomiak Radom | Piast Gliwice |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 8 | 10 |
| xPoints | 9 | 7.5 |
| xG per match | 1.5 | 1.2 |
| xGA per match | 2 | 1.8 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.33 | 0.14 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.5 | 0.31 |
| Playing style | Radomiak Radom | Piast Gliwice |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.29 | 0.3 |
| Field tilt | 0.37 | 0.5 |
| xT per match | 0.84 | 0.87 |
| xTA per match | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.26 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.29 | 0.31 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.25 | 0.29 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 21 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.72 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 329 | 401 |
| Passes against per match | 362 | 303 |
| Switches of play per match | 17 | 22.9 |
| Long balls per match | 21 | 23 |
| Set pieces | Radomiak Radom | Piast Gliwice |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Corners per match | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Corners against per match | 5.4 | 6.2 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.39 | 0.35 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.62 | 0.63 |
| Other | Radomiak Radom | Piast Gliwice |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.83 | 0.75 |
| The goalkeepers | Filip Majchrowicz (Radomiak Radom) | Domen Gril (Piast Gliwice) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 17 | 23 |
| Save % | 71% | 64% |
| xG prevented | 45% | 57% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Radomiak Radom a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Radomiak Radom 41%, draw 26%, Piast Gliwice 33%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 63% and under at 37%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 65% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.