01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Porto to win70%
- Over 1.5 goals79%
Primeira LigaEstádio Pina Manique, Lissabon25°8 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
TEXT: Casa Pia's slim 11% chance of victory underscores their uphill battle against Porto, who dominate with a 70% likelihood of taking all three points. The visitors are riding a wave of momentum, boasting six consecutive wins and a remarkable streak of scoring in 31 straight league matches. Porto's playing style, focused on possession control, contrasts sharply with the hosts' leaky-defence, direct approach, aligning with an expected xG of 2.13 for Porto compared to 0.77 for Casa Pia.
Despite the small sample size of four head-to-head encounters since 2023, Porto's 3-1 record against the hosts complements their superior form this season. With the most likely scorelines being 0-2 and 0-1, the odds favor a low-scoring affair dominated by the visitors. The expectation of over 2.5 goals sits at 55%, yet both teams to score is less probable at 48%, hinting at a potential clean sheet for Porto.
While the betting model indicates a 21% value edge with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet on a Casa Pia win at odds of 11.5, the prudent play remains backing Porto. The numbers converge on a 0-2 finish, leaning slightly over 2.5 goals, with the visitors poised to extend their winning streak.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Casa Pia | X | 2 · Porto |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 32% 12.50 | 5.25 | 1.23 |
| Betsson | EV+ 32% 12.50 | 5.25 | 1.23 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 32% 12.50 | 5.25 | 1.23 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 18% 11.13 | EV+ 12% 5.88 | 1.24 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 17:39
10.31 → 11.13
5.44 → 5.88
1.28 → 1.24
1.77 → 1.75
Pinnacle · 9 recorded price levels · 07/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Primeira Liga data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Casa Pia | Porto |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 15 |
| xPoints | 2.8 | 9.2 |
| xG per match | 0.42 | 2.2 |
| xGA per match | 1.8 | 0.98 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.13 | 0.35 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.5 | 0.33 |
| Playing style | Casa Pia | Porto |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.28 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.36 | 0.63 |
| xT per match | 0.85 | 1.5 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 0.5 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 25 | 27 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.22 | 0.21 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 19 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 6 |
| Pass completion % | 0.74 | 0.79 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.69 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 303 | 387 |
| Passes against per match | 379 | 317 |
| Switches of play per match | 30 | 21.3 |
| Long balls per match | 30 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Casa Pia | Porto |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0.07 |
| Corners per match | 4 | 6.9 |
| Corners against per match | 5.2 | 3.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.45 | 0.31 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.63 |
| Other | Casa Pia | Porto |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.71 | 0.79 |
| The goalkeepers | Andre Gomes (Casa Pia) | Diogo Costa (Porto) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 11 | 9 |
| Save % | 52% | 90% |
| xG prevented | 30% | 85% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Porto a 70% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Casa Pia 11%, draw 19%, Porto 70%.
The model's most likely final score is 0-2 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 55% and under at 45%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 48% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.