01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Hibernian to win58%
- Over 1.5 goals80%
Scottish PremiershipEaster Road, Edinburgh12°1,6 mm28 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
TEXT: Hibernian's 58% model probability highlights their edge over Aberdeen in this clash, with the hosts demonstrating stronger form both in actual and expected metrics. This advantage is underscored by their xG superiority of 1.9 to the visitors' 1.0, suggesting that the hosts are more likely to find the back of the net. The historical head-to-head record is modest, with Hibernian leading 4-2 in 7 matches, offering some confidence but shouldn't be overemphasized given its limited sample size.
Aberdeen's counter-attacking style may struggle against Hibernian's possession and high press, particularly given Aberdeen's lower xPoints (4.7) compared to the hosts' (7.9). The visitors will aim to exploit opportunities via crosses, but their xGA of 1.8 per match points to vulnerabilities in defense that Hibernian could exploit. Both teams have a slim chance of a 1-1, 2-0, or 2-1 scoreline, yet Hibernian's superior 2.00 expected goals hint at them edging a potential 2-0 victory.
The likelihood of over 2.5 goals sits at 57%, supported by Hibs' attacking prowess. Expect Hibernian to control the game given their statistical edge.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Hibernian | X | 2 · Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | EV+ 1% 1.75 | 3.75 | 4.20 |
| Betsafe | EV+ 4% 1.80 | 3.60 | 4.40 |
| Betsson | EV+ 4% 1.80 | 3.60 | 4.40 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 4% 1.80 | 3.60 | 4.40 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 16:12
1.75 → 1.75
3.75 → 3.75
4.20 → 4.20
Bet365 · 2 recorded price levels · 11/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Scottish Premiership data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Hibernian | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 6 | 4 |
| xPoints | 7.9 | 4.7 |
| xG per match | 1.9 | 1 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.5 | 0.06 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.11 | 0.36 |
| Playing style | Hibernian | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.48 | 0.38 |
| xT per match | 0.86 | 0.79 |
| xTA per match | 0.89 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 27 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.25 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.28 | 0.32 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.23 | 0.28 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 12 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.72 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.73 | 0.67 |
| Passes per match | 365 | 310 |
| Passes against per match | 405 | 371 |
| Switches of play per match | 31 | 24.2 |
| Long balls per match | 39 | 29 |
| Set pieces | Hibernian | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.02 | 0.26 |
| Corners per match | 6.2 | 5 |
| Corners against per match | 4.4 | 7.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.33 | 0.32 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.59 | 0.45 |
| Other | Hibernian | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| The goalkeepers | Raphael Sallinger (Hibernian) | Marius Müller (Aberdeen) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 17 | 24 |
| Save % | 68% | 77% |
| xG prevented | 30% | 53% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Hibernian a 58% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Hibernian 58%, draw 25%, Aberdeen 18%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 57% and under at 43%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.