01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Rangers to win65%
- Over 1.5 goals79%
Scottish PremiershipIbrox Stadium, Glasgow13°14 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
Rangers have scored in 16 consecutive league matches, a streak that underscores their attacking potency. However, their recent points tally of just one, versus St. Mirren's six, tells a tale of contrasting form. While Rangers dominate in expected goals with an edge of 2.2 to 1.6, St. Mirren has been defensively astute, boasting a lower expected goals against (xGA) of 0.98 compared to Rangers' 1.3. The tension lies in whether Rangers' attacking consistency can break down a robust St. Mirren defense that has been outperforming the metrics.
Rangers' home winning percentage of 64% in their last 39 matches is a formidable statistic, yet it doesn't overshadow the fact that St. Mirren has been outperforming expectations this season. The head-to-head record since 2023 is narrowly in Rangers' favor, with three wins to St. Mirren's two, but given the small sample size of seven matches, it should weigh less in our analysis than current form and expected goals.
The model predicts a tight affair, with the most likely scorelines being 2-0 and 1-0 to Rangers, and an 11% chance for each. There's a 56% probability of over 2.5 goals, suggesting a lean towards a game with more than two goals. Yet, the playing styles of both teams, relying on counter attacks and crosses, could mean a congested midfield battle, especially if the weather dampens the pace.
St. Mirren, despite being the underdog at a model probability of 15%, presents an intriguing value bet. The odds offered by Bet365 at 9.0, and Betsafe and Betsson at 7.8, suggest significant value given the model's 15% probability estimate. Sharp bettors might consider taking advantage of this edge, particularly if Rangers' recent struggles continue. While Rangers are rightly favored, the value lies with St. Mirren at those long odds. A 2-1 win for Rangers feels the likeliest outcome, but don't discount St. Mirren sneaking a result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Rangers | X | 2 · St. Mirren |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 1.30 | EV+ 6% 5.25 | EV+ 35% 9.00 |
| Betsafe | 1.42 | 4.30 | EV+ 17% 7.80 |
| Betsson | 1.42 | 4.30 | EV+ 17% 7.80 |
| Nordicbet | 1.42 | 4.30 | EV+ 17% 7.80 |
| Pinnacle | 1.40 | 4.82 | EV+ 10% 7.32 |
Odds updated 15 Aug, 16:04
1.40 → 1.40
4.78 → 4.82
7.27 → 7.32
Pinnacle · 3 recorded price levels · 14/08/2026 → 15/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Scottish Premiership data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Rangers | St. Mirren |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 6 |
| xPoints | 1.4 | 3.8 |
| xG per match | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 0.98 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.2 | 0.37 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0 | 0.26 |
| Playing style | Rangers | St. Mirren |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.37 |
| Field tilt | 0.76 | 0.49 |
| xT per match | 1.5 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 0.5 | 0.69 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 33 | 27 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.46 | 0.31 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.33 | 0.21 |
| Entries into the box per match | 20 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 8 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.67 | 0.73 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.66 | 0.65 |
| Passes per match | 286 | 315 |
| Passes against per match | 217 | 349 |
| Switches of play per match | 25.4 | 17.6 |
| Long balls per match | 33 | 22 |
| Set pieces | Rangers | St. Mirren |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.11 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 10.2 | 6 |
| Corners against per match | 5.1 | 4.5 |
| xG per corner | 0 | 0 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.44 | 0.42 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.6 | 0.67 |
| Other | Rangers | St. Mirren |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.69 | 0.62 |
| The goalkeepers | Ivor Pandur (Rangers) | Jacob Anthony Chapman (St. Mirren) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2 | 3 |
| Save % | 40% | 100% |
| xG prevented | 12% | 100% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Rangers a 65% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Rangers 65%, draw 20%, St. Mirren 15%.
The model's most likely final score is 2-0 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 56% and under at 44%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 52% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.