Scottish PremiershipIbrox Stadium, Glasgow13°14 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    RangersRangersCounter-attacks & crosses
    vs
    St. MirrenSt. MirrenCounter-attacks & crosses
    The model's lean: 1 · Rangers (65%)Best value by the model: 2 · St. Mirren @ 9.00 (+35 %)

    RangersSt. Mirren · Scottish Premiership

    1 · Rangers 65%X 20%15% St. Mirren · 2

    Analysis: RangersSt. Mirren

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    Rangers have scored in 16 consecutive league matches, a streak that underscores their attacking potency. However, their recent points tally of just one, versus St. Mirren's six, tells a tale of contrasting form. While Rangers dominate in expected goals with an edge of 2.2 to 1.6, St. Mirren has been defensively astute, boasting a lower expected goals against (xGA) of 0.98 compared to Rangers' 1.3. The tension lies in whether Rangers' attacking consistency can break down a robust St. Mirren defense that has been outperforming the metrics.

    Rangers' home winning percentage of 64% in their last 39 matches is a formidable statistic, yet it doesn't overshadow the fact that St. Mirren has been outperforming expectations this season. The head-to-head record since 2023 is narrowly in Rangers' favor, with three wins to St. Mirren's two, but given the small sample size of seven matches, it should weigh less in our analysis than current form and expected goals.

    The model predicts a tight affair, with the most likely scorelines being 2-0 and 1-0 to Rangers, and an 11% chance for each. There's a 56% probability of over 2.5 goals, suggesting a lean towards a game with more than two goals. Yet, the playing styles of both teams, relying on counter attacks and crosses, could mean a congested midfield battle, especially if the weather dampens the pace.

    St. Mirren, despite being the underdog at a model probability of 15%, presents an intriguing value bet. The odds offered by Bet365 at 9.0, and Betsafe and Betsson at 7.8, suggest significant value given the model's 15% probability estimate. Sharp bettors might consider taking advantage of this edge, particularly if Rangers' recent struggles continue. While Rangers are rightly favored, the value lies with St. Mirren at those long odds. A 2-1 win for Rangers feels the likeliest outcome, but don't discount St. Mirren sneaking a result.

    RangersRangers
    Form LLWDL
    League ranking xG #2xGA #3xT #2xP/match #5Points #7
    Key players
    • Lawrence ShanklandFxG 0.38 · xT 0.08
    • Thelo AasgaardLWxG 0.30 · xT 0.05
    • Cammy DevlinCMxG 0.07 · xT 0.05
    St. MirrenSt. Mirren
    Form LWDWW
    League ranking xG #4xGA #2xT #5xP/match #2Points #2
    Key players
    • Eseosa SuleFxG 0.27 · xT 0.13
    • Killian PhillipsLWxG 0.75 · xT 0.09
    • Paul NsioCMxG 0.04 · xT 0.08

    Match prediction: RangersSt. Mirren

    Predicted score matrix

    St. Mirren
    Rangers
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–05.6%
    0–14.5%
    0–22.1%
    0–30.6%
    0–4+0.2%
    1
    1–010.5%
    1–110.0%
    1–24.3%
    1–31.3%
    1–4+0.4%
    2
    2–011.0%
    2–19.9%
    2–24.4%
    2–31.3%
    2–4+0.4%
    3
    3–07.5%
    3–16.7%
    3–23.0%
    3–30.9%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–06.1%
    4+–15.5%
    4+–22.5%
    4+–30.7%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.2-011%
    2. 2.1-011%
    3. 3.1-110%
    4. 4.2-110%
    5. 5.3-08%
    Expected goals
    2,040,90
    Both teams to score
    52%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,9
    Under 2,544%
    @2.32EV+1%
    Over 2,556%
    @1.58

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Rangers to win65%
    • Over 1.5 goals79%

    Combined probability

    53%

    Fair odds

    1.88

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Rangers to win65%
    • Over 2.5 goals56%
    • Lawrence Shankland to score44%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score52%
    • Over 2.5 goals56%
    • Lawrence Shankland to score44%
    • Paul Nsio to be booked23%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · St. Mirren15% probability@9.00Bet365EV+35%reference odds
    • 2 · St. Mirren15% probability@7.80BetsafeEV+17%reference odds
    • 2 · St. Mirren15% probability@7.80BetssonEV+17%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · RangersX2 · St. Mirren
    Bet3651.30
    EV+ 6%
    5.25
    EV+ 35%
    9.00
    Betsafe1.424.30
    EV+ 17%
    7.80
    Betsson1.424.30
    EV+ 17%
    7.80
    Nordicbet1.424.30
    EV+ 17%
    7.80
    Pinnacle1.404.82
    EV+ 10%
    7.32

    Odds updated 15 Aug, 16:04

    Odds movement

    10 %
    70 %65 %

    1.401.40

    X+1 %
    22 %17 %

    4.784.82

    2+1 %
    15 %10 %

    7.277.32

    Pinnacle · 3 recorded price levels · 14/08/2026 → 15/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    7 matches
    Rangers 3Draw 2St. Mirren 2
    Goals: 99 (⌀ 2,6)

    Head-to-head based on Scottish Premiership data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Rangers have scored in 16 consecutive league matches.
    • Rangers win 64% of their home matches all-time (39 played).
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Rangers
    St. Mirren
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Rangers (23)
    St. Mirren (30)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Rangers
    Cammy Devlin: 116 passningar, xT 0.07DevlinEmmanuel Fernandez: 102 passningar, xT 0.37FernandezTuur Rommens: 92 passningar, xT 0.35RommensOlwethu Mpilwenhle Makhanya: 83 passningar, xT 0.19MakhanyaFindlay Curtis: 56 passningar, xT -0.03CurtisThelo Aasgaard: 56 passningar, xT 0.01AasgaardIvor Pandur: 52 passningar, xT 0.06PandurMohammed Baba Diomande: 49 passningar, xT 0.15DiomandeNicolas Raskin: 41 passningar, xT 0.04RaskinVanja Dragojević: 37 passningar, xT 0.18DragojevićLawrence Shankland: 32 passningar, xT 0.3Shankland
    St. Mirren
    Alexandros Gogić: 81 passningar, xT 0.1GogićRyan George Carr: 73 passningar, xT 0.08CarrPaul Nsio: 62 passningar, xT 0.16NsioMarcus Ebenezer Fraser: 54 passningar, xT 0.1FraserJayden Richardson: 51 passningar, xT 0.12RichardsonJacob Anthony Chapman: 50 passningar, xT 0.03ChapmanKillian Phillips: 47 passningar, xT 0.17PhillipsSamuel Antonio Ramos Linares: 45 passningar, xT 0.09LinaresDeclan John: 43 passningar, xT 0.11JohnChristopher Robert Mochrie: 39 passningar, xT 0.19MochrieHenry Fieldson: 23 passningar, xT 0.24Fieldson
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Rangers
    Cammy Devlin: 116 passningar, xT 0.07DevlinEmmanuel Fernandez: 102 passningar, xT 0.37FernandezTuur Rommens: 92 passningar, xT 0.35RommensOlwethu Mpilwenhle Makhanya: 83 passningar, xT 0.19MakhanyaFindlay Curtis: 56 passningar, xT -0.03CurtisThelo Aasgaard: 56 passningar, xT 0.01AasgaardIvor Pandur: 52 passningar, xT 0.06PandurMohammed Baba Diomande: 49 passningar, xT 0.15DiomandeNicolas Raskin: 41 passningar, xT 0.04RaskinVanja Dragojević: 37 passningar, xT 0.18DragojevićLawrence Shankland: 32 passningar, xT 0.3Shankland
    St. Mirren
    Alexandros Gogić: 81 passningar, xT 0.1GogićRyan George Carr: 73 passningar, xT 0.08CarrPaul Nsio: 62 passningar, xT 0.16NsioMarcus Ebenezer Fraser: 54 passningar, xT 0.1FraserJayden Richardson: 51 passningar, xT 0.12RichardsonJacob Anthony Chapman: 50 passningar, xT 0.03ChapmanKillian Phillips: 47 passningar, xT 0.17PhillipsSamuel Antonio Ramos Linares: 45 passningar, xT 0.09LinaresDeclan John: 43 passningar, xT 0.11JohnChristopher Robert Mochrie: 39 passningar, xT 0.19MochrieHenry Fieldson: 23 passningar, xT 0.24Fieldson

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceRangersSt. Mirren
    Points16
    xPoints1.43.8
    xG per match2.21.6
    xGA per match1.30.98
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.20.37
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball00.26
    Playing styleRangersSt. Mirren
    Build-up efficiency0.340.37
    Field tilt0.760.49
    xT per match1.51.1
    xTA per match0.50.69
    Won balls, offensive half3327
    Pressing intensity0.230.26
    Pressing efficiency0.460.31
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.330.21
    Entries into the box per match2013
    Entries into the box against810
    Pass completion %0.670.73
    Pass completion % under pressure0.660.65
    Passes per match286315
    Passes against per match217349
    Switches of play per match25.417.6
    Long balls per match3322
    Set piecesRangersSt. Mirren
    xG from free kicks0.110
    Corners per match10.26
    Corners against per match5.14.5
    xG per corner00
    xGA per corner against0.030.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.440.42
    First touch, defensive corners %0.60.67
    OtherRangersSt. Mirren
    Throw-in control0.690.62
    The goalkeepersIvor Pandur (Rangers)Jacob Anthony Chapman (St. Mirren)
    Saves23
    Save %40%100%
    xG prevented12%100%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Rangers vs St. Mirren according to our model?

    The model gives Rangers a 65% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Rangers 65%, draw 20%, St. Mirren 15%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 2-0 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 56% and under at 44%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 52% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.