01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Radnički Niš or draw (X2)64%
- Under 3.5 goals80%
Serbian Super League25°18 km/h
Läs på svenskaMarcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work
The model gives Radnički Niš a slight edge with a 39% win probability, while Mladost Lučani sits at 31%. Despite the close expected goals, the visitors' possession-based style may allow them to control the tempo against a host team focused on direct, low-defense play. This clash of styles might nuance the model's preference for Radnički.
Mladost holds a narrow edge in points (10 vs 5), but Radnički's historical dominance in this fixture—albeit from a small sample of five meetings—cannot be ignored. Radnički's higher xG per match (1.2) suggests a slightly more potent attack, which contrasts with the hosts' lower xG (0.89) and higher xGA (1.2). The expected goals numbers are nearly even (1.15 for Mladost, 1.13 for Radnički), indicating a tight match likely decided by fine margins.
Given the low over 2.5 goals probability (40%), a closely contested 1-1 or narrow 1-0 either way seems probable. Both teams to score sits at 47%, reinforcing a likely cagey affair. For value seekers, Radnički Niš winning at odds above 2.5 might present an enticing edge in a match that seems destined to be decided by the slimmest of margins.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Mladost Lučani | X | 2 · Radnički Niš |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bet365 | 2.45 | 3.20 | EV+ 11% 2.88 |
| Betfair Exchange | 1.17 | 1.13 | 1.17 |
| Pinnacle | 2.76 | 2.93 | 2.55 |
Odds updated 5 Sept, 02:32
2.68 → 2.76
2.93 → 2.93
2.62 → 2.55
2.25 → 2.23
Pinnacle · 5 recorded price levels · 03/09/2026 → 05/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Serbian Super League data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Mladost Lučani | Radnički Niš |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 10 | 5 |
| xPoints | 9.8 | 7.8 |
| xG per match | 0.89 | 1.2 |
| xGA per match | 1.2 | 1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.07 | 0.2 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.15 | 0.14 |
| Playing style | Mladost Lučani | Radnički Niš |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.28 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.26 | 0.69 |
| xT per match | 0.78 | 1.2 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 0.75 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 18 | 31 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.23 | 0.36 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.18 | 0.3 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.68 | 0.73 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.62 | 0.72 |
| Passes per match | 239 | 328 |
| Passes against per match | 443 | 245 |
| Switches of play per match | 11.4 | 22.7 |
| Long balls per match | 24 | 35 |
| Set pieces | Mladost Lučani | Radnički Niš |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.07 | 0.02 |
| Corners per match | 2.8 | 4.7 |
| Corners against per match | 5.5 | 3.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.53 | 0.46 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.68 | 0.52 |
| Other | Mladost Lučani | Radnički Niš |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.64 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Saša Stamenković (Mladost Lučani) | Ivan Kostić (Radnički Niš) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 33 | 14 |
| Save % | 85% | 88% |
| xG prevented | 82% | 95% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Radnički Niš a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Mladost Lučani 31%, draw 30%, Radnički Niš 39%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 14% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 40% and under at 60%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 47% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.