01 · 2 legs
Safe
- IFK Göteborg to win68%
- Over 1.5 goals82%
Swedish AllsvenskanGamla Ullevi, Göteborg16°1,4 mm21 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
TEXT: With a commanding 68% probability, the model clearly leans towards an IFK Göteborg victory against Halmstad. The hosts are backed by a solid expected goals figure of 2.17, suggesting they'll control the match through possession and a high press. Historically, Göteborg has also had the upper hand, although the small head-to-head sample of seven matches shows a balanced record with four draws.
The most likely scoreline is 2-0, followed closely by 2-1, indicating a probable home win with some degree of comfort. Halmstad's expected goals of 0.94 highlight their struggle to capitalize on counter-attacks and crosses. With a 54% chance of both teams scoring and a 60% chance of over 2.5 goals, the statistical evidence tilts towards an attacking, front-foot performance from the home side rather than a cautious one.
For those seeking value, Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet offer odds of 1.49 on a Göteborg win — a slight edge over the model's 68% implied probability. While not headline-grabbing, this well-supported bet reflects the strength of the hosts' expected performance. In a world where controlling the game pays the bills, backing IFK Göteborg here seems the prudent choice.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · IFK Göteborg | X | 2 · Halmstad |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betfair Exchange | 1.15 | 1.11 | 1.12 |
| Betsafe | EV+ 0% 1.48 | 4.45 | 6.60 |
| Betsson | EV+ 0% 1.48 | 4.45 | 6.60 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 0% 1.48 | 4.45 | 6.60 |
| Pinnacle | 1.45 | 4.81 | 6.40 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 16:38
1.48 → 1.45
4.52 → 4.81
5.97 → 6.40
Pinnacle · 11 recorded price levels · 08/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Allsvenskan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | IFK Göteborg | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 26 | 11 |
| xPoints | 31.4 | 18.7 |
| xG per match | 1.6 | 0.94 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 2.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.29 | 0.16 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.23 | 0.41 |
| Playing style | IFK Göteborg | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.34 |
| Field tilt | 0.53 | 0.4 |
| xT per match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 1.9 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 32 | 27 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.52 | 0.53 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.25 | 0.21 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.26 | 0.22 |
| Entries into the box per match | 16 | 11 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 20 |
| Pass completion % | 0.8 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.75 | 0.74 |
| Passes per match | 382 | 333 |
| Passes against per match | 364 | 505 |
| Switches of play per match | 15.7 | 15.2 |
| Long balls per match | 32 | 28 |
| Set pieces | IFK Göteborg | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.19 | 0.13 |
| Corners per match | 7 | 4.1 |
| Corners against per match | 4.8 | 7.2 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.4 | 0.35 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.63 | 0.51 |
| Other | IFK Göteborg | Halmstad |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.55 | 0.61 |
| The goalkeepers | Elis Bishesari (IFK Göteborg) | Tim Rönning (Halmstad) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 38 | 80 |
| Save % | 57% | 70% |
| xG prevented | 32% | 54% |
| Claims | 56 (85%) | 121 (90%) |
The model gives IFK Göteborg a 68% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: IFK Göteborg 68%, draw 18%, Halmstad 15%.
The model's most likely final score is 2-0 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 60% and under at 40%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.