01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Sirius to win59%
- Over 1.5 goals85%
Swedish AllsvenskanStudenternas, Uppsala16°0,6 mm11 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Sirius comes into this match with a commanding 59% chance of victory against Häcken. The model's confidence in the hosts is clear, as they not only lead on points and expected points but also boast a superior expected goals tally. Despite Häcken's historical advantage in this fixture, winning four of the past seven, the form book strongly favors the home side.
The likelihood of a 2-1 win for Sirius underscores the offensive prowess they've consistently displayed, netting in 31 consecutive league matches. With over 2.5 goals occurring in 66% of scenarios and both teams likely to score, the expectation is for an action-packed encounter. The hosts' balanced and physical style may counter Häcken's possession-based, high-press system, especially given the goal-scoring threats on both sides.
For those seeking value, Sirius at 1.81 with Betsafe, Betsson, or Nordicbet offers a 7% edge over the bookies' odds. While Häcken has dominated past meetings, the model’s insights paint a different picture this time. Sirius is poised to capitalize on their form advantage and deliver a home victory.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Sirius | X | 2 · Häcken |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 10% 1.86 | 4.07 | 3.71 |
| Betsson | EV+ 10% 1.86 | 4.07 | 3.71 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 10% 1.86 | 4.07 | 3.71 |
Odds updated 18 Aug, 20:36
1.78 → 1.86
4.19 → 4.07
3.95 → 3.71
1.39 → 1.39
Betsson · 15 recorded price levels · 16/08/2026 → 18/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Allsvenskan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Sirius | Häcken |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 42 | 28 |
| xPoints | 33.4 | 26.1 |
| xG per match | 2 | 1.6 |
| xGA per match | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.46 | 0.21 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.14 | 0.29 |
| Playing style | Sirius | Häcken |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.35 | 0.35 |
| Field tilt | 0.45 | 0.49 |
| xT per match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 31 | 27 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.5 | 0.51 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 14 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.82 | 0.83 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.77 | 0.78 |
| Passes per match | 389 | 428 |
| Passes against per match | 421 | 383 |
| Switches of play per match | 17.1 | 14 |
| Long balls per match | 30 | 31 |
| Set pieces | Sirius | Häcken |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Corners per match | 5.8 | 5.4 |
| Corners against per match | 4.8 | 5.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.37 | 0.53 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.55 | 0.62 |
| Other | Sirius | Häcken |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.58 | 0.66 |
| The goalkeepers | David Celic (Sirius) | Andreas Linde (Häcken) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 52 | 41 |
| Save % | 69% | 73% |
| xG prevented | 43% | 52% |
| Claims | 86 (90%) | 48 (89%) |
The model gives Sirius a 59% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Sirius 59%, draw 21%, Häcken 20%.
The model's most likely final score is 2-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 66% and under at 34%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 63% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.