01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Assyriska FF or draw (1X)69%
- Over 1.5 goals79%
Swedish Ettan13°0,6 mm20 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
A clash of styles awaits as Assyriska's counter-attacking flair lines up against AFC Eskilstuna's possession-based control. Despite Eskilstuna's superior points tally, the analytical model leans towards Assyriska, giving them a 41% chance of victory. This intrigue is matched by the expected goals — 1.61 for the hosts against 1.30 for the visitors — suggesting a tight contest where both teams are likely to find the net.
While AFC Eskilstuna holds a points advantage with 37 to Assyriska's 29, the xPoints metric reveals a different picture. Assyriska edges it slightly with 30.0 to Eskilstuna's 29.6, hinting at inefficiencies in capitalizing on chances by the visitors. Eskilstuna's marginally better xG (1.4 vs 1.3) doesn't overshadow the hosts' capability to consistently score, reflected in their eight-match scoring streak, while both sides carry an identical xGA of 1.3.
With over 2.5 goals favored at 56% and both teams to score at 58%, the probabilities suggest an engaging encounter. The model's prediction of a 1-1 scoreline at 12% is the most likely, yet don't dismiss the 2-1 to Assyriska at 9%, aligning with their potential to exploit Eskilstuna's high line through incisive counter-attacks and crosses.
The betting value appears with Assyriska to win, given the model's 41% probability against the draw and Eskilstuna's chances. The hosts' knack for scoring, combined with Eskilstuna's occasional lapses in defense, makes backing Assyriska a compelling shot. Expect a tight victory for the home side, with a slight lean towards the over 2.5 goals.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Assyriska FF | AFC Eskilstuna |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 29 | 37 |
| xPoints | 30 | 29.6 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.3 | 0.34 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.2 | 0.19 |
| Playing style | Assyriska FF | AFC Eskilstuna |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.38 | 0.38 |
| Field tilt | 0.39 | 0.45 |
| xT per match | 1.4 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 24 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.46 | 0.49 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.23 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.25 | 0.24 |
| Entries into the box per match | 13 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 12 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.8 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.72 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 290 | 358 |
| Passes against per match | 405 | 402 |
| Switches of play per match | 16.8 | 16.4 |
| Long balls per match | 33 | 32 |
| Set pieces | Assyriska FF | AFC Eskilstuna |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.11 | 0.14 |
| Corners per match | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Corners against per match | 5 | 4.3 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.45 | 0.45 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.71 | 0.56 |
| Other | Assyriska FF | AFC Eskilstuna |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.53 | 0.55 |
| The goalkeepers | Kingdom Osayi (Assyriska FF) | AFC Eskilstuna |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 55 | – |
| Save % | 69% | – |
| xG prevented | 43% | – |
| Claims | 97 (90%) | – |
The model gives Assyriska FF a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Assyriska FF 41%, draw 28%, AFC Eskilstuna 31%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 56% and under at 44%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 58% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.