01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Umeå FC to win46%
- Over 1.5 goals83%
Swedish Ettan12°11,1 mm24 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
The expected goals (xG) metrics tell a similar story. Umeå FC boasts an impressive 1.8 xG per match, which starkly contrasts with Piteå's underwhelming 0.97 xG. Defensively, Piteå concedes more, with an xGA of 1.9 compared to Umeå's 1.6, suggesting that the hosts could struggle to contain the visitors’ attacking threats. These figures align with the model probabilities, heavily favoring Umeå FC with a 46% chance of victory.
For those eyeing the betting market, the model leans towards a likely scoreline of 1-1, which corresponds with the over 2.5 goals probability at a significant 62%. With a strong chance of both teams finding the net at 63%, the over 2.5 goals market looks particularly enticing, especially if the bookmakers offer appealing odds. Such a wager aligns well with the statistical trends and Umeå's proven ability to break down Piteå's defenses.
Umeå FC have consistently held the upper hand in this fixture, securing three wins out of five against Piteå since 2023. Yet, this small sample size does not fully capture the current dynamics, where Umeå's form and statistical superiority might play a more decisive role. While Piteå did manage a solitary win, the balance historically tips towards the visitors, reinforcing a narrative that this match could see them capitalize on their evident edge.
Delving into the numbers, Umeå FC's dominance isn't just historical. Their 23 points in the league significantly outstrip Piteå's 15, underscoring their more successful campaign thus far. This is further substantiated by expected points, where Umeå leads with 30.2 to Piteå's 18.6, reflecting a team that's consistently outperformed their opponents. The visitors' style centered on possession control could exploit Piteå's low defensive setup, which often leaves them vulnerable.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Piteå | Umeå FC |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 15 | 23 |
| xPoints | 18.6 | 30.2 |
| xG per match | 0.97 | 1.8 |
| xGA per match | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.25 | 0.36 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.39 | 0.27 |
| Playing style | Piteå | Umeå FC |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.36 | 0.41 |
| xT per match | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 22 | 27 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.47 | 0.42 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.23 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.24 | 0.3 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 17 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.8 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.75 | 0.72 |
| Passes per match | 342 | 322 |
| Passes against per match | 416 | 349 |
| Switches of play per match | 16.8 | 17.1 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 30 |
| Set pieces | Piteå | Umeå FC |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.12 | 0.15 |
| Corners per match | 3.7 | 6.1 |
| Corners against per match | 5.7 | 5.9 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.06 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.31 | 0.26 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.57 | 0.53 |
| Other | Piteå | Umeå FC |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.62 | 0.54 |
| The goalkeepers | Filip Eriksson (Piteå) | Pontus Eriksson (Umeå FC) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 87 | 48 |
| Save % | 69% | 71% |
| xG prevented | 50% | 53% |
| Claims | 106 (91%) | 54 (92%) |
The model gives Umeå FC a 46% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Piteå 30%, draw 23%, Umeå FC 46%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 62% and under at 38%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 63% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.