01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance AFC Malmö or draw (X2)62%
- Over 1.5 goals84%
Swedish Ettan15°2,0 mm17 km/h
Läs på svenska
AFC MalmöPossession & high pressErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
With both teams having scored in every recent league match, the stage is set for a clash under the lights. The model gives a slight edge to AFC Malmö with a 40% win probability, though the narrow margins suggest a close encounter. Tvååker's counter-attacking flair will meet Malmö's pressing game, offering a tantalizing tactical showdown. The small head-to-head sample, just one match, tips in favor of the hosts, but it shouldn't outweigh the more significant indicators of form and expected goals.
Expected goals reveal a near deadlock: Tvååker at 1.64 and Malmö at 1.63. This aligns with the most likely scorelines of 1-1 (10%) and 1-2 (8%), underscoring the potential for a tightly contested draw. The projected over 2.5 goals at 63% indicates an open game, but the drizzle forecast implies a marginal dampening effect, already considered in these numbers.
For the more prudent bettor, the home side offers value with odds of 3.15 across several bookmakers, given a 33% win probability by the model. This 5% edge in the odds makes Tvååker an enticing option for those inclined toward calculated risks. While Malmö might have the edge in model probability, the value skews slightly toward the hosts.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Tvååker | X | 2 · AFC Malmö |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 5% 3.15 | 3.60 | 1.98 |
| Betsson | EV+ 5% 3.15 | 3.60 | 1.98 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 5% 3.15 | 3.60 | 1.98 |
Odds updated 10 Sept, 14:36
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards a Tvååker win since 7 September — the odds have shortened from 3.50 to 3.15 (−10%).
3.50 → 3.15
3.75 → 3.60
1.82 → 1.98
Betsson · 6 recorded price levels · 07/09/2026 → 10/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Tvååker | AFC Malmö |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 32 | 31 |
| xPoints | 25 | 25.4 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 1.5 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.2 | 0.32 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.25 | 0.35 |
| Playing style | Tvååker | AFC Malmö |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.36 |
| Field tilt | 0.38 | 0.55 |
| xT per match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| xTA per match | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 22 | 30 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.5 | 0.49 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.27 | 0.29 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 17 |
| Entries into the box against | 17 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.8 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.73 | 0.75 |
| Passes per match | 337 | 410 |
| Passes against per match | 411 | 349 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.1 | 17.3 |
| Long balls per match | 30 | 37 |
| Set pieces | Tvååker | AFC Malmö |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.08 | 0.13 |
| Corners per match | 3.5 | 5.4 |
| Corners against per match | 7 | 4.9 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.47 | 0.56 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.61 | 0.59 |
| Other | Tvååker | AFC Malmö |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.57 | 0.59 |
| The goalkeepers | Alexander Capocci Nielsen (Tvååker) | Philip Mårtensson (AFC Malmö) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 89 | 41 |
| Save % | 77% | 70% |
| xG prevented | 69% | 34% |
| Claims | 85 (89%) | 69 (92%) |
The model gives AFC Malmö a 40% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Tvååker 33%, draw 27%, AFC Malmö 40%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 63% and under at 37%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 65% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.