01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Helsingborgs IF to win47%
- Over 1.5 goals83%
Swedish SuperettanOlympia, Helsingborg17°1,5 mm17 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
Helsingborgs IF holds a clear edge in historical meetings against Örebro SK, winning 4 of their last 5 encounters. However, the small sample size of these head-to-heads means current form and expected goals are more telling. The model leans towards Helsingborgs with a 47% win probability, reflecting their superior xG per match at 1.3 compared to Örebro's 0.96.
Despite the hosts' dominance on paper, both sides play possession football, suggesting a tightly contested match. The expected goals for the game sit at 1.86 for Helsingborgs and 1.36 for Örebro, indicating a high likelihood of both teams scoring. The model puts the over 2.5 goals probability at 62%, hinting at potential for goals despite both teams' control styles.
For bettors, there's a noteworthy value bet on the over 3.5 goals market available at odds of 2.58 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet. The model rates this outcome at 40%, offering a 4% edge over the bookmakers. This represents the sharpest angle, especially if the game opens up beyond the possession battle both teams typically engage in.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Helsingborgs IF | X | 2 · Örebro SK |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 2% 2.16 | 3.54 | 3.15 |
| Betsson | EV+ 2% 2.16 | 3.54 | 3.15 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 2% 2.16 | 3.54 | 3.15 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 1% 2.13 | 3.77 | 3.03 |
Odds updated 31 Aug, 05:14
2.19 → 2.13
3.79 → 3.77
2.91 → 3.03
1.65 → 1.65
Pinnacle · 3 recorded price levels · 26/08/2026 → 31/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Superettan data since 2024.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Helsingborgs IF | Örebro SK |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 25 | 19 |
| xPoints | 21 | 22.6 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 0.96 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.29 | 0.15 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.26 | 0.26 |
| Playing style | Helsingborgs IF | Örebro SK |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.37 |
| Field tilt | 0.55 | 0.51 |
| xT per match | 1.7 | 1.4 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 34 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.55 | 0.57 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.29 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.3 | 0.29 |
| Entries into the box per match | 15 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.74 | 0.76 |
| Passes per match | 427 | 405 |
| Passes against per match | 328 | 381 |
| Switches of play per match | 13.5 | 16.1 |
| Long balls per match | 27 | 28 |
| Set pieces | Helsingborgs IF | Örebro SK |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.09 | 0.13 |
| Corners per match | 5.4 | 4.8 |
| Corners against per match | 4.7 | 5.3 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.06 | 0.04 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.37 | 0.49 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.63 |
| Other | Helsingborgs IF | Örebro SK |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.55 | 0.53 |
| The goalkeepers | Johan Brattberg (Helsingborgs IF) | Jakub Ojrzynski (Örebro SK) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 72 | 76 |
| Save % | 68% | 70% |
| xG prevented | 45% | 59% |
| Claims | 135 (93%) | 113 (89%) |
The model gives Helsingborgs IF a 47% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Helsingborgs IF 47%, draw 24%, Örebro SK 29%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 62% and under at 38%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 63% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.