01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Falkenberg or draw (X2)62%
- Over 1.5 goals80%
Swedish SuperettanSkarsjövallen, Uddevalla16°4,3 mm13 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
TEXT: Fifteen straight games with a goal. That's the streak Falkenberg rides into their clash against Ljungskile, a testament to their attacking consistency. While the visitors have a slight edge in the model's win probability at 39%, the numbers suggest a razor-thin contest. Ljungskile's 1.5 expected goals per match shade Falkenberg's 1.3, yet both sides adopt a possession-driven approach, which might see tactical control rather than goalscoring flair dominate proceedings.
Despite a scant head-to-head sample — just a lone draw since 2024 — the weighted importance lies in current form and expected goals. Ljungskile's xG and xPoints suggest a team with underutilized potential, but Falkenberg's positional consistency in scoring can't be ignored. Both teams are expected to find the net with a 60% probability, pointing towards a potentially high-scoring affair, albeit one dampened slightly by the forecast of nearly 10 mm of rain. This weather factor is accounted for in the model, which still leans towards the overs at 57%.
For bettors, the away win offers value at odds of 2.65 across multiple bookmakers, including Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet. With a 5% edge identified, Falkenberg's continued scoring run coupled with Ljungskile's shaky form makes the visitors an attractive proposition.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Ljungskile | X | 2 · Falkenberg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.44 | 3.44 | EV+ 8% 2.75 |
| Betsson | 2.44 | 3.44 | EV+ 8% 2.75 |
| Nordicbet | 2.44 | 3.44 | EV+ 8% 2.75 |
| Pinnacle | 2.44 | 3.49 | EV+ 8% 2.73 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 12:38
Head-to-head based on Superettan data since 2024.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Ljungskile | Falkenberg |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 25 | 38 |
| xPoints | 30.3 | 29.8 |
| xG per match | 1.5 | 1.3 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.27 | 0.2 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.3 | 0.28 |
| Playing style | Ljungskile | Falkenberg |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.36 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.47 | 0.42 |
| xT per match | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 1.4 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 32 | 26 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.55 | 0.55 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.28 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.28 | 0.29 |
| Entries into the box per match | 17 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 14 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.8 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.7 | 0.72 |
| Passes per match | 337 | 406 |
| Passes against per match | 349 | 385 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.9 | 18.5 |
| Long balls per match | 36 | 34 |
| Set pieces | Ljungskile | Falkenberg |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.17 | 0.14 |
| Corners per match | 5.6 | 4.2 |
| Corners against per match | 5.4 | 4.7 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.4 | 0.43 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.63 | 0.47 |
| Other | Ljungskile | Falkenberg |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.54 | 0.56 |
| The goalkeepers | Lukas Eriksson (Ljungskile) | Anton Andersson (Falkenberg) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 79 | 33 |
| Save % | 73% | 62% |
| xG prevented | 58% | 42% |
| Claims | 131 (95%) | 98 (97%) |
The model gives Falkenberg a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Ljungskile 35%, draw 26%, Falkenberg 39%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 57% and under at 43%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.