01 · 2 legs
Safe
- IFK Norrköping to win48%
- Over 1.5 goals81%
Swedish SuperettanPåskbergsvallen, Varberg14°30 km/h
Läs på svenskaSofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work
IFK Norrköping's eight-match unbeaten streak is the standout number here, underscoring their form superiority over Varbergs BoIS. The visitors have also found the net in each of those eight games, hinting at their attacking reliability. While the hosts will likely rely on counter-attacks and crosses, Norrköping’s possession control style gives them an upper hand in dictating play.
Despite the small sample size in head-to-head statistics between these teams, the broader form lines are more telling. Norrköping also leads in expected goals (1.70 to Varberg's 1.34) and xPoints metrics. This aligns with the model's 48% win probability for Norrköping. The most probable outcome is a 1-1 draw (11%), but a 1-2 away win (9%) is close behind, which fits Norrköping's current scoring form.
Given the match's potential for goals, the over 2.5 goals market at 59% leans towards an active match. However, the sharpest angle lies in betting value: the away win at odds 2.09, available across Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, represents a slight edge given the model's 48% probability. For those siding with Norrköping's form, this value bet stands out among the options.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
| Bookmaker | 1 · Varbergs BoIS | X | 2 · IFK Norrköping |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 3.36 | 3.59 | 2.05 |
| Betsson | 3.36 | 3.59 | 2.05 |
| Nordicbet | 3.36 | 3.59 | 2.05 |
| Pinnacle | 3.52 | 3.71 | 2.02 |
Odds updated 10 Sept, 10:37
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards an IFK Norrköping win since 5 September — the odds have shortened from 2.13 to 2.02 (−5%).
3.19 → 3.52
3.54 → 3.71
2.13 → 2.02
Pinnacle · 14 recorded price levels · 05/09/2026 → 10/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Superettan data since 2024.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Varbergs BoIS | IFK Norrköping |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 38 | 48 |
| xPoints | 30.8 | 36.8 |
| xG per match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.39 | 0.42 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.23 | 0.27 |
| Playing style | Varbergs BoIS | IFK Norrköping |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.44 | 0.61 |
| xT per match | 1.5 | 1.7 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 36 | 39 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.58 | 0.56 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.3 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.27 | 0.3 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 16 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.73 | 0.8 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.69 | 0.75 |
| Passes per match | 299 | 432 |
| Passes against per match | 374 | 328 |
| Switches of play per match | 20 | 15.1 |
| Long balls per match | 35 | 33 |
| Set pieces | Varbergs BoIS | IFK Norrköping |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.12 | 0.2 |
| Corners per match | 4.9 | 5.3 |
| Corners against per match | 4.5 | 5.4 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.38 | 0.53 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.66 | 0.55 |
| Other | Varbergs BoIS | IFK Norrköping |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.44 | 0.63 |
| The goalkeepers | Oscar Ekman (Varbergs BoIS) | Theo Krantz (IFK Norrköping) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 41 | 67 |
| Save % | 65% | 84% |
| xG prevented | 39% | 67% |
| Claims | 84 (94%) | 117 (89%) |
The model gives IFK Norrköping a 48% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Varbergs BoIS 28%, draw 24%, IFK Norrköping 48%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 59% and under at 41%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 61% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.