01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Sion to win50%
- Over 1.5 goals85%
Swiss Super LeagueStade de Tourbillon, Sion23°17 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
FAKTA: Model probabilities: Sion 50%, draw 26%, Thun 24%. Model lean: Sion. Most likely scorelines: 1-1 (10%), 2-1 (9%), 2-0 (7%). Expected goals: Sion 2.00, Thun 1.37. Over 2.5 goals: 65%. Both teams to score: 65%. Playing style: Sion profiles as counter attack & crosses, Thun as low defence & direct. Sion have scored in 16 consecutive league matches. Head-to-head since 2023: 4 matches, Sion 1W 0D 3L. Points: Sion 9 vs Thun 7 (edge Sion) xPoints: Sion 7.5 vs Thun 5.1 (edge Sion) xG per match: Sion 2.0 vs Thun 1.3 (edge Sion) xGA per match: Sion 1.6 vs Thun 2.3 (edge Sion) Value (EV+): draw at odds 4.05 with Betsafe — the model rates it 26% (4% edge). Value (EV+): draw at odds 4.05 with Betsson — the model rates it 26% (4% edge). Value (EV+): draw at odds 4.05 with Nordicbet — the model rates it 26% (4% edge).
Corrected TEXT: Sion's knack for finding the net in 16 consecutive league outings makes them a challenging prospect for any opponent, and their defensive solidity gives Thun little to work with. With expected goals heavily favoring the hosts at 2.00 to Thun's 1.37, and a consistent edge across points and expected points, Sion seems poised to dictate terms at home. However, the recent head-to-head record paints a different picture: Thun have triumphed in three of their last four meetings, albeit from a small sample.
Sion's attacking prowess is matched by defensive solidity, as reflected by an average of 1.6 expected goals against per match, better than Thun's 2.3. Thun's more direct approach, coupled with a low defensive block, will need to work hard to find openings against that. Yet, with Thun's expected goals per match sitting at just 1.3, breaking down Sion's defense remains a challenging proposition.
The model suggests a keen tilt towards Sion, particularly with a 50% win probability compared to Thun's 24%. The most likely scorelines, 1-1 and 2-1, echo the precarious balance between Sion's attack and Thun's resilience. Additionally, the over 2.5 goals probability at 65% suggests an open affair, despite Thun's typically reserved stance.
Betting angles favoring a draw are intriguing, with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet offering odds of 4.05, presenting a 4% edge according to the model's 26% draw probability. While these odds provide value, the lean towards Sion suggests they might just edge it, potentially in a 2-1 fashion.
In a match where Sion's attacking intent meets Thun's disciplined defense, the standout betting angle remains the value on a draw at 4.05 across multiple bookmakers. It might not be the most thrilling play, but it's the kind of calculated risk that could reward the patient bettor.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Sion | X | 2 · Thun |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betfair Exchange | 1.57 | 1.11 | 1.11 |
| Betsafe | 1.65 | EV+ 1% 3.95 | EV+ 2% 4.20 |
| Betsson | 1.65 | EV+ 1% 3.95 | EV+ 2% 4.20 |
| Nordicbet | 1.65 | EV+ 1% 3.95 | EV+ 2% 4.20 |
| Paddy Power | 1.60 | EV+ 8% 4.20 | EV+ 2% 4.20 |
| Pinnacle | 1.71 | EV+ 10% 4.28 | EV+ 10% 4.52 |
Odds updated 6 Sept, 11:36
1.68 → 1.71
4.16 → 4.28
4.52 → 4.52
Pinnacle · 14 recorded price levels · 04/09/2026 → 06/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Swiss Super League data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Sion | Thun |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 9 | 7 |
| xPoints | 7.5 | 5.1 |
| xG per match | 2 | 1.3 |
| xGA per match | 1.6 | 2.3 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.42 | 0.36 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.34 | 0.34 |
| Playing style | Sion | Thun |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.33 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.58 | 0.42 |
| xT per match | 1.9 | 0.84 |
| xTA per match | 1.1 | 1.5 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 27 | 24 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.34 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.28 | 0.31 |
| Entries into the box per match | 21 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 15 |
| Pass completion % | 0.8 | 0.7 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.75 | 0.64 |
| Passes per match | 436 | 268 |
| Passes against per match | 328 | 328 |
| Switches of play per match | 32.3 | 24.9 |
| Long balls per match | 31 | 38 |
| Set pieces | Sion | Thun |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.03 | 0.1 |
| Corners per match | 5.6 | 4.3 |
| Corners against per match | 4 | 5.1 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.61 | 0.45 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.45 | 0.5 |
| Other | Sion | Thun |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.75 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Anthony Racioppi (Sion) | Niklas Steffen (Thun) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 14 | 23 |
| Save % | 61% | 62% |
| xG prevented | 35% | 38% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Sion a 50% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Sion 50%, draw 26%, Thun 24%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 65% and under at 35%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 65% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.