01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Vaduz to win61%
- Over 1.5 goals82%
Swiss Super LeagueRheinpark Stadion, Vaduz21°2,0 mm13 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
Vaduz's 61% win probability stands out starkly against their recent form, having lost four consecutive matches. Yet, the model's confidence in the hosts isn't without reason. Despite their struggles, Vaduz's expected goals (xG) at 2.06 dwarfs Grasshopper's 1.07, indicating a clear offensive edge. This discrepancy aligns with their playing style, preferring counter-attacks and crosses, while Grasshopper leans towards possession control. The real question is whether Vaduz can convert this potential into a much-needed victory or if their recent slump will persist.
Grasshopper's solitary point from their matches might suggest a minor edge, but a deeper dive reveals a different story. Vaduz has an xPoints advantage of 5.2 to Grasshopper’s 3.7, reflecting better underlying performances despite the poor results. The visitors' marginally better defense, allowing 1.4 xGA per match compared to Vaduz's 2.1, offers some hope. Still, the hosts' offensive potential creates a compelling case for a home win, especially given Grasshopper's limited scoring threat.
Considering the odds, Vaduz offers significant value at 2.05 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, rated by the model at a 61% likelihood, providing a 24% edge. The numbers point towards a 2-1 victory for the home side and a lean towards over 2.5 goals, despite the hosts' losing streak.
The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Vaduz | X | 2 · Grasshopper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 24% 2.05 | 3.50 | 3.10 |
| Betsson | EV+ 24% 2.05 | 3.50 | 3.10 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 24% 2.05 | 3.50 | 3.10 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 31% 2.16 | 3.82 | 3.19 |
Odds updated 30 Aug, 10:31
2.05 → 2.16
3.82 → 3.82
3.15 → 3.19
Pinnacle · 11 recorded price levels · 24/08/2026 → 30/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Vaduz | Grasshopper |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0 | 1 |
| xPoints | 5.2 | 3.7 |
| xG per match | 1.9 | 1 |
| xGA per match | 2.1 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.26 | 0.35 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.62 | 0.39 |
| Playing style | Vaduz | Grasshopper |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.29 | 0.28 |
| Field tilt | 0.43 | 0.49 |
| xT per match | 0.64 | 1 |
| xTA per match | 1.5 | 1.6 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 32 | 25 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.29 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.31 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.29 | 0.25 |
| Entries into the box per match | 15 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 23 | 16 |
| Pass completion % | 0.75 | 0.7 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.72 | 0.63 |
| Passes per match | 405 | 304 |
| Passes against per match | 347 | 390 |
| Switches of play per match | 22.8 | 17 |
| Long balls per match | 36 | 24 |
| Set pieces | Vaduz | Grasshopper |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.07 | 0.1 |
| Corners per match | 3.9 | 3.3 |
| Corners against per match | 8.4 | 5.2 |
| xG per corner | 0 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.57 | 0.3 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.47 | 0.56 |
| Other | Vaduz | Grasshopper |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.7 | 0.67 |
| The goalkeepers | Leon Schaffran (Vaduz) | Justin Hammel (Grasshopper) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 14 | 10 |
| Save % | 61% | 59% |
| xG prevented | 49% | 38% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Vaduz a 61% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Vaduz 61%, draw 21%, Grasshopper 18%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 60% and under at 40%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 57% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.