01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Mardin 1969 to win48%
- Over 1.5 goals84%
Turkish 1. Lig28°0,4 mm23 km/h
Läs på svenska
VansporPossession controlErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
Expected goals tell a compelling story before Mardin 1969 faces Vanspor. With Mardin averaging 1.7 expected goals per match and keeping opponents to a meager 0.77 xGA, the hosts present a sturdy defensive and offensive front. In stark contrast, Vanspor struggles defensively, conceding 2.2 xGA on average, and their attack yields only 0.79 xG. This discrepancy in both attack and defense implies a challenging evening for the visitors.
Mardin's physical and balanced style could further expose Vanspor's vulnerabilities. The model heavily favors Mardin at 48%, with the next most likely outcome being a draw at 25%. Given these probabilities, Mardin’s edge in both tangible points and expected points can’t be overlooked. The visitors' emphasis on possession might see them control phases of play, but converting possession into tangible threats is another matter entirely, especially against a disciplined opponent.
With the most likely scorelines sharing the stage at a 10% chance of 1-1 or 2-1, and a 7% chance of 2-0, the chances tilt towards a Mardin victory with a slight lean on over 2.5 goals at 64%. Both teams to score is also a healthy 63%, indicating potential for action at both ends, but the scales tip towards Mardin maintaining the upper hand throughout.
Given these insights, a 2-1 victory for Mardin appears the shrewdest prediction, reflecting their superior defensive record and more efficient attack. The game’s expected flow and the model's probabilities make an intriguing case for backing Mardin to win at odds provided by Bet365, priced at 2.05. While not a guarantee, it’s an opportunity where value emerges from the numbers, blending statistical insight with a touch of pragmatism.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Mardin 1969 | Vanspor |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 7 | 3 |
| xPoints | 5.2 | 2.6 |
| xG per match | 1.7 | 0.79 |
| xGA per match | 0.77 | 2.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.55 | 0.23 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.05 | 0.49 |
| Playing style | Mardin 1969 | Vanspor |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.38 | 0.28 |
| Field tilt | 0.52 | 0.33 |
| xT per match | 1.2 | 0.5 |
| xTA per match | 0.74 | 1.3 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 15 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.21 | 0.22 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.23 | 0.15 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 8 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 11 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.76 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.73 | 0.72 |
| Passes per match | 344 | 291 |
| Passes against per match | 395 | 483 |
| Switches of play per match | 34.3 | 16.9 |
| Long balls per match | 37 | 27 |
| Set pieces | Mardin 1969 | Vanspor |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.01 | 0.09 |
| Corners per match | 5.8 | 4 |
| Corners against per match | 3.1 | 3 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0 | 0.06 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.29 | 0.5 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.67 | 0 |
| Other | Mardin 1969 | Vanspor |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.65 | 0.67 |
| The goalkeepers | Erce Kardesler (Mardin 1969) | Alperen Uysal (Vanspor) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 9 | 6 |
| Save % | 100% | 43% |
| xG prevented | 100% | 45% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Mardin 1969 a 48% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Mardin 1969 48%, draw 25%, Vanspor 27%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 64% and under at 36%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 63% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.