01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Amedspor or draw (1X)70%
- Over 1.5 goals77%
Süper Lig27°13 km/h
Läs på svenska
AmedsporPossession controlErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
Amedspor's possession-based style meets İstanbul Başakşehir's balanced and physical approach, setting up a clash of contrasting philosophies. The hosts have shown more resilience in defense, with an expected goals against (xGA) of 0.9 per match, compared to İstanbul Başakşehir's 1.4. This defensive solidity might just tilt the scales in favor of Amedspor, especially on home turf, where they've collected 7 points to Başakşehir's 4 in the league.
Despite being the underdog at 31% likelihood, Başakşehir has managed to score in 10 consecutive league matches. This suggests they shouldn't be underestimated in front of goal. Their xG per match stands at 1.7, slightly surpassing Amedspor's 1.3, indicating that if they do break through, it's likely to come from a well-constructed attack rather than a lucky strike.
The model probabilities give Amedspor a slight edge at 41%, nudging the needle towards a home win. The expected goals figures of 1.54 for Amedspor and 1.25 for Başakşehir reinforce this. The most likely scorelines reflect a tight contest: 1-1 (12%), 1-0 (9%), and 2-1 (9%). With the over/under 2.5 goals set at 53%, there’s a mild expectation for more than two goals, aligning with the 56% chance that both teams will find the net.
Betting angles favor Amedspor at home. With odds of 2.48 from Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, the 3% edge in value (EV+) offers a tempting proposition for those looking to back the model's preference. While it's far from a guarantee, it highlights where the sharper money might land. A 1-1 draw seems plausible, but a narrow 2-1 victory for Amedspor wouldn't be out of the question.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Amedspor | X | 2 · İstanbul Başakşehir |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | EV+ 4% 2.52 | 3.35 | 2.62 |
| Betsson | EV+ 4% 2.52 | 3.35 | 2.62 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 4% 2.52 | 3.35 | 2.62 |
| Paddy Power | EV+ 14% 2.75 | 3.40 | 2.20 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 4% 2.50 | 3.50 | 2.72 |
Odds updated 11 Sept, 11:40
2.60 → 2.50
3.45 → 3.50
2.64 → 2.72
1.82 → 1.81
Pinnacle · 4 recorded price levels · 08/09/2026 → 11/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Amedspor | İstanbul Başakşehir |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 7 | 4 |
| xPoints | 6.5 | 6.2 |
| xG per match | 1.3 | 1.7 |
| xGA per match | 0.9 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.16 | 0.24 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.21 | 0.36 |
| Playing style | Amedspor | İstanbul Başakşehir |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.48 | 0.56 |
| xT per match | 0.66 | 1.1 |
| xTA per match | 0.58 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 21 | 25 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.21 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.23 | 0.23 |
| Entries into the box per match | 10 | 13 |
| Entries into the box against | 7 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.81 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.74 | 0.76 |
| Passes per match | 363 | 423 |
| Passes against per match | 363 | 375 |
| Switches of play per match | 23.2 | 47.8 |
| Long balls per match | 26 | 51 |
| Set pieces | Amedspor | İstanbul Başakşehir |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.16 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 5.3 | 4.8 |
| Corners against per match | 3.4 | 3.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0 | 0.01 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.41 | 0.47 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.77 | 0.6 |
| Other | Amedspor | İstanbul Başakşehir |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.74 | 0.83 |
| The goalkeepers | Alban-Marc Lafont (Amedspor) | Muhammed Sengezer (İstanbul Başakşehir) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 11 | 14 |
| Save % | 69% | 82% |
| xG prevented | 59% | 51% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Amedspor a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Amedspor 41%, draw 27%, İstanbul Başakşehir 31%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 56% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.