EFL League TwoSMH Group Stadium, Chesterfield19°19 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    ChesterfieldChesterfieldPossession control
    01
    Fleetwood TownFleetwood TownCounter-attacks & crosses
    The model's lean: 1 · Chesterfield (53%)

    ChesterfieldFleetwood Town · EFL League Two

    1 · Chesterfield 53%X 26%22% Fleetwood Town · 2

    Analysis: ChesterfieldFleetwood Town

    Marcus Johansson · · How the predictions work

    With Chesterfield carrying a 53% win probability, their edge over Fleetwood Town is palpable. The numbers suggest a tight affair, yet one where Chesterfield holds the upper hand. Their recent form contrasts with the small head-to-head sample of just four matches since 2023, where both sides have shared the spoils evenly with one win apiece. Despite this limited sample, Chesterfield's control-oriented playing style could be pivotal in breaking down Fleetwood's defensive stance.

    Chesterfield's position at the top of the League Two standings with 80 points compared to Fleetwood Town's 61 tells its own story. However, the expected goal metrics paint a slightly different picture: Chesterfield averages 1.3 xG per match, while Fleetwood Town edges them with 1.4. Defensively, Chesterfield concedes less with an xGA of 1.2 compared to Fleetwood Town's 1.4, suggesting they are more likely to keep the visitors at bay.

    Fleetwood Town prefers the counter-attack and crossing approach, which may not yield many chances against a Chesterfield side accustomed to controlling possession. With expected goals for Chesterfield at 1.63 and Fleetwood Town at 0.93, the forecast leans towards a low-scoring game. The over/under 2.5 goals sits at 47%, indicating a tilt towards the under, while both teams to score is rated at 49%.

    Chesterfield appears poised for a victory, with a 1-0 scoreline emerging as the most probable outcome. The odds suggest a slender margin, so a narrow win or a low-scoring draw seems likely. The weather holds no surprises, thus no dampening effect on the scoring potential.

    The sharpest betting angle here is Chesterfield's victory, with Betfair offering an enticing EV+ play at 1.91 odds. Given their superior control and defensive record, Chesterfield is well-positioned to justify their favoritism and deliver a result that keeps their promotion push on track.

    ChesterfieldChesterfield
    Form DWWLD
    League ranking xG #12xGA #9xT #10xP/match #13Points #6
    Key players
    • Lewis GordonLBxG 0.02 · xT 0.09
    • Tom NaylorCMxG 0.17 · xT 0.08
    • Will GriggFxG 0.45 · xT -0.02
    Fleetwood TownFleetwood Town
    Form LWDDD
    League ranking xG #9xGA #15xT #2xP/match #12Points #15
    Key players
    • Ryan GraydonFxG 0.34 · xT 0.11
    • Ethan EnnisRWxG 0.13 · xT 0.25
    • Joshua Alan PowellLWBxG 0.02 · xT 0.11
    Final score
    01
    The model missed the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Chesterfield 53% · Draw 26% · Fleetwood Town 22%

    How the bookmaker bet builders went

    The verdict on the pre-built bet builders for this match, priced against the model’s score matrix before kickoff. Graded on the 90-minute result.

    Matchresultat - ChesterfieldBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 6,87fair 8,02-14 %
    Miss
    Matchresultat - FleetwoodBåda lagen gör mål - JaTotalt antal mål - Över 3.5
    odds 17,06fair 23,82-28 %
    Miss

    Match prediction: ChesterfieldFleetwood Town

    Predicted score matrix

    Fleetwood Town
    Chesterfield
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–08.1%
    0–16.9%
    0–23.4%
    0–31.1%
    0–4+0.3%
    1
    1–012.2%
    1–112.1%
    1–25.5%
    1–31.7%
    1–4+0.5%
    2
    2–010.2%
    2–19.5%
    2–24.5%
    2–31.4%
    2–4+0.4%
    3
    3–05.5%
    3–15.2%
    3–22.4%
    3–30.8%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–03.2%
    4+–13.0%
    4+–21.4%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-012%
    2. 2.1-112%
    3. 3.2-010%
    4. 4.2-110%
    5. 5.0-08%
    Expected goals
    1,630,93
    Both teams to score
    49%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,6
    Under 2,553%
    @1.78
    Over 2,547%
    @2.06

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Chesterfield to win53%
    • Under 3.5 goals74%

    Combined probability

    38%

    Fair odds

    2.67

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Chesterfield to win53%
    • Under 2.5 goals53%
    • Lee Bonis to score29%

    Combined probability

    7%

    Fair odds

    15.16

    Result and goals are priced jointly from the matrix; the scorer is the model's most likely in the picked side.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score49%
    • Over 2.5 goals47%
    • Lee Bonis to score29%
    • Raffaele Cirino to be booked19%

    Combined probability

    2%

    Fair odds

    49.08

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals — combined with the match's most likely scorer and card candidate.

    Odds & value

    Bookmaker1 · ChesterfieldX2 · Fleetwood Town
    Betsafe1.783.404.40
    Betsson1.783.404.40
    Nordicbet1.823.404.25
    Pinnacle1.833.584.44

    Odds updated 15 Aug, 11:37

    Odds movement

    10 %
    55 %50 %

    1.831.83

    X+3 %
    29 %24 %

    3.493.58

    2+5 %
    24 %19 %

    4.224.44

    Over 2,5+1 %
    49 %44 %

    2.032.06

    Pinnacle · 6 recorded price levels · 11/08/2026 → 15/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Chesterfield 1Draw 2Fleetwood Town 1
    Goals: 54 (⌀ 2,2)

    Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Chesterfield
    Fleetwood Town
    When goals are scored and conceded 2025
    Chesterfield (7157)
    Fleetwood Town (5758)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Chesterfield
    Sil Laurentius Swinkels: 227 passningar, xT 0.33SwinkelsLewis Gordon: 203 passningar, xT 0.27GordonKyle Mcfadzean: 200 passningar, xT 0.4McfadzeanSamuel Charles Braybrooke: 194 passningar, xT 0.65BraybrookeRyan Stirk: 156 passningar, xT 0.08StirkSam Curtis: 139 passningar, xT 0.26CurtisRyan Thomas William Boot: 126 passningar, xT 0.18BootJanoi Donacien: 92 passningar, xT 0.45DonacienLiam Mandeville: 76 passningar, xT 0.2MandevilleDilan Markanday: 75 passningar, xT 0.33MarkandayArmando Dobra: 63 passningar, xT 0.48Dobra
    Fleetwood Town
    Harrison Neal: 169 passningar, xT 0.14NealFinley Potter: 166 passningar, xT 0.31PotterJames Bolton: 121 passningar, xT 0.17BoltonMark Helm: 98 passningar, xT 0.14HelmJay Lynch: 91 passningar, xT 0.16LynchConor Haughey: 89 passningar, xT 0.13HaugheyEthan Ennis: 85 passningar, xT 2.05EnnisElliot Bonds: 80 passningar, xT 0.15BondsHarrison Holgate: 69 passningar, xT 0.25HolgateMitch Clark: 55 passningar, xT 0.25ClarkJoshua Alan Powell: 44 passningar, xT 0.22Powell
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Chesterfield
    Sil Laurentius Swinkels: 227 passningar, xT 0.33SwinkelsLewis Gordon: 203 passningar, xT 0.27GordonKyle Mcfadzean: 200 passningar, xT 0.4McfadzeanSamuel Charles Braybrooke: 194 passningar, xT 0.65BraybrookeRyan Stirk: 156 passningar, xT 0.08StirkSam Curtis: 139 passningar, xT 0.26CurtisRyan Thomas William Boot: 126 passningar, xT 0.18BootJanoi Donacien: 92 passningar, xT 0.45DonacienLiam Mandeville: 76 passningar, xT 0.2MandevilleDilan Markanday: 75 passningar, xT 0.33MarkandayArmando Dobra: 63 passningar, xT 0.48Dobra
    Fleetwood Town
    Harrison Neal: 169 passningar, xT 0.14NealFinley Potter: 166 passningar, xT 0.31PotterJames Bolton: 121 passningar, xT 0.17BoltonMark Helm: 98 passningar, xT 0.14HelmJay Lynch: 91 passningar, xT 0.16LynchConor Haughey: 89 passningar, xT 0.13HaugheyEthan Ennis: 85 passningar, xT 2.05EnnisElliot Bonds: 80 passningar, xT 0.15BondsHarrison Holgate: 69 passningar, xT 0.25HolgateMitch Clark: 55 passningar, xT 0.25ClarkJoshua Alan Powell: 44 passningar, xT 0.22Powell

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceChesterfieldFleetwood Town
    Points8061
    xPoints63.361.7
    xG per match1.31.4
    xGA per match1.21.4
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.240.2
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.280.2
    Playing styleChesterfieldFleetwood Town
    Build-up efficiency0.320.33
    Field tilt0.660.47
    xT per match0.91
    xTA per match0.870.86
    Won balls, offensive half2628
    Pressing intensity0.220.23
    Pressing efficiency0.390.37
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.40.38
    Entries into the box per match1213
    Entries into the box against1112
    Pass completion %0.720.63
    Pass completion % under pressure0.70.61
    Passes per match362253
    Passes against per match232264
    Switches of play per match27.621.2
    Long balls per match3832
    Set piecesChesterfieldFleetwood Town
    xG from free kicks0.070.09
    Corners per match5.54.8
    Corners against per match4.85.2
    xG per corner0.040.06
    xGA per corner against0.050.05
    First touch, offensive corners %0.380.43
    First touch, defensive corners %0.580.62
    OtherChesterfieldFleetwood Town
    Throw-in control0.730.7
    The goalkeepersZachary Hemming (Chesterfield)Jay Lynch (Fleetwood Town)
    Saves87109
    Save %64%66%
    xG prevented44%40%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Chesterfield vs Fleetwood Town according to our model?

    The model gives Chesterfield a 53% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Chesterfield 53%, draw 26%, Fleetwood Town 22%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-0 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 47% and under at 53%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.