EFL League TwoPriestfield Stadium, Gillingham21°16 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    GillinghamGillinghamCounter-attacks & crosses
    vs
    WalsallWalsallLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 2 · Walsall (40%)

    GillinghamWalsall · EFL League Two

    1 · Gillingham 34%X 27%40% Walsall · 2

    Analysis: GillinghamWalsall

    Oscar Nilsson · · How the predictions work

    Forty percent is the key number as Gillingham prepares to host Walsall, with the model tipping the visitors as favourites. Despite the narrow margins in expected goals — 1.18 for Gillingham and 1.17 for Walsall — those fractions underscore the tightness of this League Two clash. Yet, it’s Walsall who have the edge, both in points and xPoints, suggesting they’re not just lucky but consistently outperforming their opponents.

    Gillingham's reliance on counter-attacks and crosses will meet Walsall's low defensive line and direct play, a setup that often leads to stalemates rather than goal-fests. With a mere 42% chance of over 2.5 goals and a 48% probability for both teams to score, it feels like the tactical joust will favour a low-scoring affair. The model’s most likely outcomes of 1-1 and 0-1 reflect this cautious dance at both ends of the pitch.

    Walsall’s slight advantage in points, 65 to Gillingham’s 53, is backed by a superior xGA per match of 1.2 compared to Gillingham’s 1.4. This defensive robustness, paired with their direct style, could stifle Gillingham's attacking aspirations, especially under the pressure of maintaining the home side's unbeaten head-to-head record since 2023. But with only a quartet of recent encounters, this past form holds less water than the current dynamics.

    Walsall commands the sharpest betting angle here, with a 40% implied probability at odds of 3.12 with Pinnacle — a substantial 23% edge. Betsafe and Betsson also offer value odds of 3.05, underlining the potential for a profitable wager. In a match that feels destined for tight margins and cautious play, staking on a Walsall victory at these odds could be the smart play for the shrewd punter.

    GillinghamGillingham
    Form DLLLW
    League ranking xG #4xGA #14xT #11xP/match #8Points #17
    Key players
    • Josh AndrewsFxG 0.37 · xT 0.03
    • Sebastian Palmer-HouldenFxG 0.24 · xT 0.01
    • Armani LittleCMxG 0.17 · xT 0.10
    WalsallWalsall
    Form LLWLL
    League ranking xG #7xGA #8xT #18xP/match #3Points #13
    Key players
    • Daniel Malanga KanuFxG 0.36 · xT 0.03
    • Ryan James FinniganFxG 0.36 · xT 0.06
    • Aaron PressleyFxG 0.33 · xT 0.04

    Match prediction: GillinghamWalsall

    Predicted score matrix

    Walsall
    Gillingham
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–09.9%
    0–110.8%
    0–26.5%
    0–32.5%
    0–4+1.0%
    1
    1–010.9%
    1–113.6%
    1–27.7%
    1–33.0%
    1–4+1.1%
    2
    2–06.7%
    2–17.8%
    2–24.5%
    2–31.8%
    2–4+0.7%
    3
    3–02.6%
    3–13.1%
    3–21.8%
    3–30.7%
    3–4+0.3%
    4+
    4+–01.0%
    4+–11.2%
    4+–20.7%
    4+–30.3%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-114%
    2. 2.1-011%
    3. 3.0-111%
    4. 4.0-010%
    5. 5.2-18%
    Expected goals
    1,181,17
    Both teams to score
    48%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,3
    Under 2,558%
    @1.76EV+2%
    Over 2,542%
    @2.03

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Walsall or draw (X2)64%
    • Under 3.5 goals79%

    Combined probability

    51%

    Fair odds

    1.96

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Walsall or draw (X2)64%
    • Under 2.5 goals58%
    • Aaron Alex Pressley to score24%

    Combined probability

    10%

    Fair odds

    10.02

    Result and goals are priced jointly from the matrix; the scorer is the model's most likely in the picked side.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score48%
    • Over 2.5 goals42%
    • Aaron Alex Pressley to score24%
    • Harrison John Burke to be booked18%

    Combined probability

    2%

    Fair odds

    64.39

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals — combined with the match's most likely scorer and card candidate.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Walsall40% probability@3.13PinnacleEV+24%
    • 2 · Walsall40% probability@3.05BetsafeEV+21%
    • 2 · Walsall40% probability@3.05BetssonEV+21%
    Bookmaker1 · GillinghamX2 · Walsall
    Betsafe2.283.20
    EV+ 21%
    3.05
    Betsson2.283.20
    EV+ 21%
    3.05
    Nordicbet2.283.20
    EV+ 21%
    3.05
    Pinnacle2.303.23
    EV+ 24%
    3.13

    Odds updated 12 Aug, 04:54

    Odds movement

    10 %
    43 %38 %

    2.292.30

    X-1 %
    31 %26 %

    3.253.23

    20 %
    33 %28 %

    3.123.13

    Over 2,5+1 %
    49 %44 %

    2.012.03

    Pinnacle · 2 recorded price levels · 11/08/2026 → 12/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Gillingham 1Draw 3Walsall 0
    Goals: 43 (⌀ 1,8)

    Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Gillingham
    Walsall
    When goals are scored and conceded 2025
    Gillingham (5372)
    Walsall (5656)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Gillingham
    Armani Little: 165 passningar, xT 0.21LittleMax Clark: 154 passningar, xT 0.46ClarkGlenn Morris: 108 passningar, xT 0.3MorrisRemeao Hutton: 78 passningar, xT 0.25HuttonConor Masterson: 69 passningar, xT 0.15MastersonSam Gale: 65 passningar, xT 0GaleBradley Dack: 59 passningar, xT 0.49DackAndy Smith: 57 passningar, xT 0.2SmithGarath James McCleary: 48 passningar, xT 0.21McClearyRonan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman Hale: 41 passningar, xT 0.05HaleRobbie Mckenzie: 40 passningar, xT -0.02Mckenzie
    Walsall
    Mason Colin Hancock: 200 passningar, xT 0.79HancockCharlie Lakin: 141 passningar, xT 0.58LakinJamie Ryan Jellis: 120 passningar, xT 0.5JellisAden Flint: 107 passningar, xT 0.12FlintBrandon Comley: 92 passningar, xT 0.06ComleyAlbert Adomah: 71 passningar, xT 0.75AdomahMyles Roberts: 68 passningar, xT 0.07RobertsConnor Barrett: 51 passningar, xT 0.29BarrettKacper Mieczyslaw Łopata: 50 passningar, xT 0.05ŁopataPriestley Farquharson: 49 passningar, xT 0.07FarquharsonAlex Pattison: 47 passningar, xT 0.12Pattison
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Gillingham
    Armani Little: 165 passningar, xT 0.21LittleMax Clark: 154 passningar, xT 0.46ClarkGlenn Morris: 108 passningar, xT 0.3MorrisRemeao Hutton: 78 passningar, xT 0.25HuttonConor Masterson: 69 passningar, xT 0.15MastersonSam Gale: 65 passningar, xT 0GaleBradley Dack: 59 passningar, xT 0.49DackAndy Smith: 57 passningar, xT 0.2SmithGarath James McCleary: 48 passningar, xT 0.21McClearyRonan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman Hale: 41 passningar, xT 0.05HaleRobbie Mckenzie: 40 passningar, xT -0.02Mckenzie
    Walsall
    Mason Colin Hancock: 200 passningar, xT 0.79HancockCharlie Lakin: 141 passningar, xT 0.58LakinJamie Ryan Jellis: 120 passningar, xT 0.5JellisAden Flint: 107 passningar, xT 0.12FlintBrandon Comley: 92 passningar, xT 0.06ComleyAlbert Adomah: 71 passningar, xT 0.75AdomahMyles Roberts: 68 passningar, xT 0.07RobertsConnor Barrett: 51 passningar, xT 0.29BarrettKacper Mieczyslaw Łopata: 50 passningar, xT 0.05ŁopataPriestley Farquharson: 49 passningar, xT 0.07FarquharsonAlex Pattison: 47 passningar, xT 0.12Pattison

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceGillinghamWalsall
    Points5365
    xPoints68.274.1
    xG per match1.51.4
    xGA per match1.41.2
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.20.25
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.230.24
    Playing styleGillinghamWalsall
    Build-up efficiency0.340.36
    Field tilt0.450.46
    xT per match0.880.8
    xTA per match0.940.85
    Won balls, offensive half3228
    Pressing intensity0.230.22
    Pressing efficiency0.370.33
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.360.36
    Entries into the box per match1211
    Entries into the box against1211
    Pass completion %0.580.59
    Pass completion % under pressure0.580.57
    Passes per match205199
    Passes against per match252330
    Switches of play per match17.415.5
    Long balls per match3426
    Set piecesGillinghamWalsall
    xG from free kicks0.10.13
    Corners per match5.14.6
    Corners against per match4.45.4
    xG per corner0.060.07
    xGA per corner against0.070.05
    First touch, offensive corners %0.340.37
    First touch, defensive corners %0.60.59
    OtherGillinghamWalsall
    Throw-in control0.710.68
    The goalkeepersGlenn Morris (Gillingham)Myles Roberts (Walsall)
    Saves85103
    Save %66%68%
    xG prevented53%53%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Gillingham vs Walsall according to our model?

    The model gives Walsall a 40% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Gillingham 34%, draw 27%, Walsall 40%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 14% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 42% and under at 58%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 48% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.