Premier LeagueHill Dickinson Stadium, Liverpool15°0,7 mm16 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    EvertonEvertonLow block & direct
    vs
    Crystal PalaceCrystal PalacePossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Everton (36%)Soft drawBest value by the model: Under 1,5 @ 3.57 (+16 %)

    EvertonCrystal Palace · Premier League

    1 · Everton 36%X 31%33% Crystal Palace · 2

    Analysis: EvertonCrystal Palace

    Anna Karlsson · · How the predictions work

    Four matches might not be a robust sample, but Everton FC's head-to-head record against Crystal Palace since 2022 tells a clear story: the Toffees have dominated with three wins and a draw. Yet, this dominance appears to clash with underlying metrics that paint a different picture. Crystal Palace edges Everton FC in xPoints (52.6 vs 49.1) and xG per match (1.4 vs 1.3), suggesting a more potent creative force on the pitch. Everton’s low defence and direct style will clash with Palace's possession-oriented play, shaping up a tactical battle where both sides are likely to cancel each other out.

    Crystal Palace may hold a slight edge in expected goals and xPoints, but when it comes to actual points, Everton FC leads with 49 against Palace's 45. The model also leans towards Everton FC with a 36% probability of securing a win compared to Palace's 33%. However, the most probable scoreline remains a tight 1-1 draw at 14%, with each team finding the back of the net expected at a moderate 47%. The tense tug-of-war between style and substance may result in a tightly contested affair.

    Everton FC enters the fray with a defensive mindset, a style that could suppress the goal tally, especially with Crystal Palace looking to control possession. The expected goals tally sits almost even, Everton at 1.16 and Palace at 1.15, making it hard to predict a high-scoring game. Add to that the over 2.5 goals probability at just 41%, and the likelihood of a goal-fest diminishes further.

    The most compelling betting angle lies in the under 1.5 goals market, presenting a value opportunity with three bookmakers: Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet all offering odds of 3.57. With a model-estimated probability of 32% and a significant 16% edge, this could be an opportunity for punters looking to capitalise on a tight, low-scoring affair at Goodison Park. All signs point to a closely-fought 1-1 draw, with the under edges offering the sharpest route to value.

    EvertonEverton
    Form LDDLL
    League ranking xG #17xGA #16xT #13xP/match #16Points #13
    Key players
    • BetoFxG 0.60 · xT 0.00
    • Iliman NdiayeRWxG 0.18 · xT 0.08
    • James GarnerCMxG 0.06 · xT 0.11
    Crystal PalaceCrystal Palace
    Form LDLDL
    League ranking xG #11xGA #13xT #7xP/match #11Points #15
    Key players
    • Jean-Philippe MatetaFxG 0.47 · xT 0.08
    • Jørgen Strand LarsenFxG 0.26 · xT 0.06
    • Adam WhartonCMxG 0.06 · xT 0.22

    Match prediction: EvertonCrystal Palace

    Predicted score matrix

    Crystal Palace
    Everton
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–010.3%
    0–111.0%
    0–26.5%
    0–32.5%
    0–4+0.9%
    1
    1–011.1%
    1–113.6%
    1–27.6%
    1–32.9%
    1–4+1.1%
    2
    2–06.7%
    2–17.7%
    2–24.4%
    2–31.7%
    2–4+0.6%
    3
    3–02.6%
    3–13.0%
    3–21.7%
    3–30.7%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–01.0%
    4+–11.1%
    4+–20.6%
    4+–30.2%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-114%
    2. 2.1-011%
    3. 3.0-111%
    4. 4.0-010%
    5. 5.2-18%
    Expected goals
    1,161,15
    Both teams to score
    47%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,3
    Under 2,559%
    @1.90EV+13%
    Over 2,541%
    @1.92

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Everton or draw (1X)65%
    • Under 3.5 goals80%

    Combined probability

    52%

    Fair odds

    1.92

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Everton or draw (1X)65%
    • Under 2.5 goals59%
    • Thierno Mamadou Barry to score24%

    Combined probability

    10%

    Fair odds

    10.03

    Result and goals are priced jointly from the matrix; the scorer is the model's most likely in the picked side.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score47%
    • Over 2.5 goals41%
    • Thierno Mamadou Barry to score24%
    • Adam James Wharton to be booked22%

    Combined probability

    2%

    Fair odds

    56.52

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals — combined with the match's most likely scorer and card candidate.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 1.532% probability@3.57BetsafeEV+16%
    • Under 1.532% probability@3.57BetssonEV+16%
    • Under 1.532% probability@3.57NordicbetEV+16%
    Bookmaker1 · EvertonX2 · Crystal Palace
    Betsafe2.15
    EV+ 3%
    3.30
    EV+ 12%
    3.40
    Betsson2.17
    EV+ 4%
    3.33
    EV+ 13%
    3.44
    Nordicbet2.18
    EV+ 5%
    3.35
    EV+ 13%
    3.45

    Odds updated 18 Aug, 05:36

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Everton 3Draw 1Crystal Palace 0
    Goals: 85 (⌀ 3,2)

    Head-to-head based on Premier League data since 2022.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Everton
    Crystal Palace
    When goals are scored and conceded 2025
    Everton (4750)
    Crystal Palace (4151)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Everton
    James Garner: 236 passningar, xT 0.49GarnerMichael Keane: 167 passningar, xT 0.24KeaneVitalii Mykolenko: 167 passningar, xT 0.36MykolenkoJames Tarkowski: 161 passningar, xT 0.23TarkowskiJordan Pickford: 130 passningar, xT 0.17PickfordKiernan Dewsbury Hall: 122 passningar, xT 0.66HallTim Iroegbunam: 98 passningar, xT 0IroegbunamIliman Ndiaye: 94 passningar, xT -0.11NdiayeJake Obrien: 90 passningar, xT 0.11ObrienMerlin Röhl: 49 passningar, xT 0.12RöhlIdrissa Gueye: 38 passningar, xT 0.04Gueye
    Crystal Palace
    Maxence Lacroix: 152 passningar, xT 0.08LacroixJaydee Canvot: 147 passningar, xT 0.07CanvotAdam Wharton: 122 passningar, xT 1.05WhartonDaichi Kamada: 111 passningar, xT 0.75KamadaTyrick Mitchell: 111 passningar, xT 0.38MitchellDaniel Munoz: 104 passningar, xT 0.55MunozJefferson Lerma: 99 passningar, xT 0.16LermaChris Richards: 99 passningar, xT 0.1RichardsChadi Riad: 87 passningar, xT -0.05RiadDean Henderson: 75 passningar, xT 0.15HendersonYeremy Pino: 51 passningar, xT 0.52Pino
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Everton
    James Garner: 236 passningar, xT 0.49GarnerMichael Keane: 167 passningar, xT 0.24KeaneVitalii Mykolenko: 167 passningar, xT 0.36MykolenkoJames Tarkowski: 161 passningar, xT 0.23TarkowskiJordan Pickford: 130 passningar, xT 0.17PickfordKiernan Dewsbury Hall: 122 passningar, xT 0.66HallTim Iroegbunam: 98 passningar, xT 0IroegbunamIliman Ndiaye: 94 passningar, xT -0.11NdiayeJake Obrien: 90 passningar, xT 0.11ObrienMerlin Röhl: 49 passningar, xT 0.12RöhlIdrissa Gueye: 38 passningar, xT 0.04Gueye
    Crystal Palace
    Maxence Lacroix: 152 passningar, xT 0.08LacroixJaydee Canvot: 147 passningar, xT 0.07CanvotAdam Wharton: 122 passningar, xT 1.05WhartonDaichi Kamada: 111 passningar, xT 0.75KamadaTyrick Mitchell: 111 passningar, xT 0.38MitchellDaniel Munoz: 104 passningar, xT 0.55MunozJefferson Lerma: 99 passningar, xT 0.16LermaChris Richards: 99 passningar, xT 0.1RichardsChadi Riad: 87 passningar, xT -0.05RiadDean Henderson: 75 passningar, xT 0.15HendersonYeremy Pino: 51 passningar, xT 0.52Pino

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceEvertonCrystal Palace
    Points4945
    xPoints49.152.6
    xG per match1.31.4
    xGA per match1.61.6
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.210.18
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.240.19
    Playing styleEvertonCrystal Palace
    Build-up efficiency0.310.31
    Field tilt0.450.44
    xT per match0.91
    xTA per match10.86
    Won balls, offensive half3125
    Pressing intensity0.240.23
    Pressing efficiency0.240.27
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.270.31
    Entries into the box per match1213
    Entries into the box against1313
    Pass completion %0.750.74
    Pass completion % under pressure0.710.69
    Passes per match315316
    Passes against per match430396
    Switches of play per match21.922.1
    Long balls per match2827
    Set piecesEvertonCrystal Palace
    xG from free kicks0.060.05
    Corners per match4.54.2
    Corners against per match5.25.3
    xG per corner0.050.08
    xGA per corner against0.080.07
    First touch, offensive corners %0.320.36
    First touch, defensive corners %0.620.65
    OtherEvertonCrystal Palace
    Throw-in control0.660.67
    The goalkeepersJordan Pickford (Everton)Dean Henderson (Crystal Palace)
    Saves100106
    Save %67%68%
    xG prevented45%46%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Everton vs Crystal Palace according to our model?

    The model gives Everton a 36% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Everton 36%, draw 31%, Crystal Palace 33%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 14% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 41% and under at 59%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 47% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.