01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Lunds BK to win50%
- Over 1.5 goals83%
Swedish Ettan20°15 km/h
Läs på svenska
Hässleholms IFCounter-attacks & crossesMarcus Johansson · · How the predictions work
Lunds BK's home turf is a fortress, with the team clinching victory in 61% of their matches in front of their own fans — a compelling statistic given the competitive nature of the Ettan. With model probabilities favoring Lunds BK at 50% for the win, and the fact that they edge Hässleholms IF by a whisker in both points and expected goals per match (1.8 vs. 1.5), the hosts seem poised to leverage their possession-based style to control the game. However, their challenge will be to unpick a Hässleholms IF side riding high on a three-match winning streak and a reputation for dangerous counterplay and crosses.
Lunds BK might appear slightly favored, but Hässleholms IF has a knack for disrupting patterns. Despite being outpaced in xG, their xPoints of 26.8 slightly edge Lunds BK’s 25.2, illustrating a side that knows how to eke out results even when they are not the most dominant. As the visitors revel in their counter-attacking prowess, Lunds BK will need to be wary of leaving themselves open at the back, where they concede 1.3 xGA per match.
Looking at the matchup history, Lunds BK holds a slender advantage, winning two of the three head-to-heads since 2023 — yet this small sample size demands prudence. It's the expected goals and current form that should weigh more heavily in our analysis. The expected goals suggest an open game with Lunds BK scoring nearly twice as much as Hässleholms IF, but the visitors' recent form cannot be ignored.
With a 61% chance of over 2.5 goals, and both teams likely to find the net (60%), the numbers hint at a lively affair. The most probable scorelines, 1-1 and 2-1, suggest a tight encounter, but Lunds BK's home advantage and Hässleholms IF's form create a compelling back-and-forth narrative. A 2-1 victory for Lunds BK emerges as a likely scenario, tipping the balance in favor of the hosts but not without a stiff challenge.
For the betting connoisseur, there's an intriguing value play with Lunds BK to win offered at 2.00 with Bet365. Given the model's lean and Lunds BK's solid home record, this could be the sharpest angle for those willing to back the numbers.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
| Bookmaker | 1 · Lunds BK | X | 2 · Hässleholms IF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.92 | 3.55 | 3.40 |
| Betsson | 1.92 | 3.55 | 3.40 |
| Nordicbet | 1.92 | 3.55 | 3.40 |
Odds updated 13 Aug, 09:36
1.95 → 1.92
3.65 → 3.55
3.20 → 3.40
Betsson · 4 recorded price levels · 10/08/2026 → 13/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Lunds BK | Hässleholms IF |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 28 | 27 |
| xPoints | 25.2 | 26.8 |
| xG per match | 1.8 | 1.5 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.4 | 0.38 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.32 | 0.3 |
| Playing style | Lunds BK | Hässleholms IF |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.55 | 0.39 |
| xT per match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| xTA per match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 40 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.49 | 0.45 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.32 | 0.3 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.34 | 0.3 |
| Entries into the box per match | 15 | 10 |
| Entries into the box against | 12 | 15 |
| Pass completion % | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.66 | 0.65 |
| Passes per match | 334 | 266 |
| Passes against per match | 301 | 372 |
| Switches of play per match | 20.7 | 15.5 |
| Long balls per match | 35 | 24 |
| Set pieces | Lunds BK | Hässleholms IF |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.16 | 0.23 |
| Corners per match | 5.5 | 3.2 |
| Corners against per match | 4.5 | 6.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.41 | 0.29 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.62 | 0.65 |
| Other | Lunds BK | Hässleholms IF |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.41 | 0.49 |
| The goalkeepers | Andreas Alexandersson (Lunds BK) | Liam Bengtsson (Hässleholms IF) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 41 | 39 |
| Save % | 68% | 64% |
| xG prevented | 40% | 45% |
| Claims | 98 (92%) | 97 (96%) |
The model gives Lunds BK a 50% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Lunds BK 50%, draw 24%, Hässleholms IF 26%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 61% and under at 39%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.