Swedish Ettan20°15 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Lunds BKLunds BKPossession control
    vs
    Hässleholms IFHässleholms IFCounter-attacks & crosses
    The model's lean: 1 · Lunds BK (50%)

    Lunds BKHässleholms IF · Swedish Ettan

    1 · Lunds BK 50%X 24%26% Hässleholms IF · 2

    Analysis: Lunds BKHässleholms IF

    Marcus Johansson · · How the predictions work

    Lunds BK's home turf is a fortress, with the team clinching victory in 61% of their matches in front of their own fans — a compelling statistic given the competitive nature of the Ettan. With model probabilities favoring Lunds BK at 50% for the win, and the fact that they edge Hässleholms IF by a whisker in both points and expected goals per match (1.8 vs. 1.5), the hosts seem poised to leverage their possession-based style to control the game. However, their challenge will be to unpick a Hässleholms IF side riding high on a three-match winning streak and a reputation for dangerous counterplay and crosses.

    Lunds BK might appear slightly favored, but Hässleholms IF has a knack for disrupting patterns. Despite being outpaced in xG, their xPoints of 26.8 slightly edge Lunds BK’s 25.2, illustrating a side that knows how to eke out results even when they are not the most dominant. As the visitors revel in their counter-attacking prowess, Lunds BK will need to be wary of leaving themselves open at the back, where they concede 1.3 xGA per match.

    Looking at the matchup history, Lunds BK holds a slender advantage, winning two of the three head-to-heads since 2023 — yet this small sample size demands prudence. It's the expected goals and current form that should weigh more heavily in our analysis. The expected goals suggest an open game with Lunds BK scoring nearly twice as much as Hässleholms IF, but the visitors' recent form cannot be ignored.

    With a 61% chance of over 2.5 goals, and both teams likely to find the net (60%), the numbers hint at a lively affair. The most probable scorelines, 1-1 and 2-1, suggest a tight encounter, but Lunds BK's home advantage and Hässleholms IF's form create a compelling back-and-forth narrative. A 2-1 victory for Lunds BK emerges as a likely scenario, tipping the balance in favor of the hosts but not without a stiff challenge.

    For the betting connoisseur, there's an intriguing value play with Lunds BK to win offered at 2.00 with Bet365. Given the model's lean and Lunds BK's solid home record, this could be the sharpest angle for those willing to back the numbers.

    Lunds BKLunds BK
    Form LDWDD
    League ranking xG #2xGA #15xT #18xP/match #9Points #8
    Key players
    • Filip AkdemirFxG 0.37 · xT 0.02
    • Emil LindmanFxG 0.17 · xT 0.38
    • Momodou BojangFxG 0.49 · xT 0.01
    Hässleholms IFHässleholms IF
    Form LDWWW
    League ranking xG #10xGA #8xT #16xP/match #3Points #10
    Key players
    • Albin AhlstrandFxG 0.23 · xT 0.11
    • Alex HallFxG 0.44 · xT 0.13
    • Johan Persson ÅhstedtLWxG 0.06 · xT 0.17

    Match prediction: Lunds BKHässleholms IF

    Predicted score matrix

    Hässleholms IF
    Lunds BK
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–04.5%
    0–14.7%
    0–23.0%
    0–31.2%
    0–4+0.5%
    1
    1–08.0%
    1–110.2%
    1–25.9%
    1–32.3%
    1–4+0.9%
    2
    2–08.2%
    2–19.8%
    2–25.8%
    2–32.3%
    2–4+0.9%
    3
    3–05.4%
    3–16.5%
    3–23.9%
    3–31.5%
    3–4+0.6%
    4+
    4+–04.2%
    4+–15.1%
    4+–23.0%
    4+–31.2%
    4+–4+0.5%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-110%
    2. 2.2-110%
    3. 3.2-08%
    4. 4.1-08%
    5. 5.3-16%
    Expected goals
    1,981,19
    Both teams to score
    60%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,2
    Under 2,539%
    @2.35
    Over 2,561%
    @1.52

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Lunds BK to win50%
    • Over 1.5 goals83%

    Combined probability

    47%

    Fair odds

    2.11

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Lunds BK to win50%
    • Over 2.5 goals61%
    • Momodou Bojang to score30%

    Combined probability

    12%

    Fair odds

    8.42

    Result and goals are priced jointly from the matrix; the scorer is the model's most likely in the picked side.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score60%
    • Over 2.5 goals61%
    • Momodou Bojang to score30%
    • Bozidar Velickovic to be booked19%

    Combined probability

    3%

    Fair odds

    34.44

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals — combined with the match's most likely scorer and card candidate.

    Odds & value

    Bookmaker1 · Lunds BKX2 · Hässleholms IF
    Betsafe1.923.553.40
    Betsson1.923.553.40
    Nordicbet1.923.553.40

    Odds updated 13 Aug, 09:36

    Odds movement

    1-2 %
    50 %45 %

    1.951.92

    X-3 %
    28 %23 %

    3.653.55

    2+6 %
    30 %25 %

    3.203.40

    Betsson · 4 recorded price levels · 10/08/2026 → 13/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    3 matches
    Lunds BK 2Draw 0Hässleholms IF 1
    Goals: 21 (⌀ 1)

    Head-to-head based on Ettan data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Hässleholms IF come into this round on 3 straight wins.
    • Lunds BK win 61% of their home matches all-time (51 played).
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Lunds BK
    Hässleholms IF
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Lunds BK (2919)
    Hässleholms IF (3122)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Lunds BK
    Bozidar Velickovic: 245 passningar, xT 0.53VelickovicLudvig Nicklasson: 153 passningar, xT 0.35NicklassonEmil Lindman: 149 passningar, xT 1.87LindmanAndreas Alexandersson: 148 passningar, xT 0.58AlexanderssonJonathan Jacobsson: 142 passningar, xT 0.37JacobssonGustav Sågänger: 127 passningar, xT 0.31SågängerIsak Orajärvi: 102 passningar, xT -0.17OrajärviAleandro Wihlborg Costa: 90 passningar, xT 0.12CostaDennis Olofsson: 84 passningar, xT 0.36OlofssonAlexander Nilsson: 79 passningar, xT 0.72NilssonSimon Lindfors: 75 passningar, xT 0.12Lindfors
    Hässleholms IF
    Vilmer Persson Åhstedt: 180 passningar, xT 1.65ÅhstedtAnton Branting: 163 passningar, xT 0.49BrantingRami Jassim: 160 passningar, xT 0.22JassimAdi Terzic: 156 passningar, xT 0.37TerzicJohan Persson Åhstedt: 150 passningar, xT 0.66ÅhstedtAlbin Andersson: 93 passningar, xT 0.32AnderssonPontus Carlsson: 80 passningar, xT 0.26CarlssonAlbin Ahlstrand: 72 passningar, xT 0.78AhlstrandAlex Hall: 62 passningar, xT 0.01HallJussi Tikkanen: 32 passningar, xT 0TikkanenÄnnäss Al Hamlawi: 29 passningar, xT 0.18Hamlawi
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Lunds BK
    Bozidar Velickovic: 245 passningar, xT 0.53VelickovicLudvig Nicklasson: 153 passningar, xT 0.35NicklassonEmil Lindman: 149 passningar, xT 1.87LindmanAndreas Alexandersson: 148 passningar, xT 0.58AlexanderssonJonathan Jacobsson: 142 passningar, xT 0.37JacobssonGustav Sågänger: 127 passningar, xT 0.31SågängerIsak Orajärvi: 102 passningar, xT -0.17OrajärviAleandro Wihlborg Costa: 90 passningar, xT 0.12CostaDennis Olofsson: 84 passningar, xT 0.36OlofssonAlexander Nilsson: 79 passningar, xT 0.72NilssonSimon Lindfors: 75 passningar, xT 0.12Lindfors
    Hässleholms IF
    Vilmer Persson Åhstedt: 180 passningar, xT 1.65ÅhstedtAnton Branting: 163 passningar, xT 0.49BrantingRami Jassim: 160 passningar, xT 0.22JassimAdi Terzic: 156 passningar, xT 0.37TerzicJohan Persson Åhstedt: 150 passningar, xT 0.66ÅhstedtAlbin Andersson: 93 passningar, xT 0.32AnderssonPontus Carlsson: 80 passningar, xT 0.26CarlssonAlbin Ahlstrand: 72 passningar, xT 0.78AhlstrandAlex Hall: 62 passningar, xT 0.01HallJussi Tikkanen: 32 passningar, xT 0TikkanenÄnnäss Al Hamlawi: 29 passningar, xT 0.18Hamlawi

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceLunds BKHässleholms IF
    Points2827
    xPoints25.226.8
    xG per match1.81.5
    xGA per match1.31.1
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.40.38
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.320.3
    Playing styleLunds BKHässleholms IF
    Build-up efficiency0.340.33
    Field tilt0.550.39
    xT per match1.41.4
    xTA per match1.41.6
    Won balls, offensive half4028
    Pressing intensity0.490.45
    Pressing efficiency0.320.3
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.340.3
    Entries into the box per match1510
    Entries into the box against1215
    Pass completion %0.730.73
    Pass completion % under pressure0.660.65
    Passes per match334266
    Passes against per match301372
    Switches of play per match20.715.5
    Long balls per match3524
    Set piecesLunds BKHässleholms IF
    xG from free kicks0.160.23
    Corners per match5.53.2
    Corners against per match4.56.6
    xG per corner0.030.02
    xGA per corner against0.040.02
    First touch, offensive corners %0.410.29
    First touch, defensive corners %0.620.65
    OtherLunds BKHässleholms IF
    Throw-in control0.410.49
    The goalkeepersAndreas Alexandersson (Lunds BK)Liam Bengtsson (Hässleholms IF)
    Saves4139
    Save %68%64%
    xG prevented40%45%
    Claims98 (92%)97 (96%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Lunds BK vs Hässleholms IF according to our model?

    The model gives Lunds BK a 50% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Lunds BK 50%, draw 24%, Hässleholms IF 26%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 61% and under at 39%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.