EFL League OneAbbey Stadium, Cambridge20°12 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Cambridge UnitedCambridge United
    vs
    Wigan AthleticWigan AthleticLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 1 · Cambridge United (53%)

    Cambridge UnitedWigan Athletic · EFL League One

    1 · Cambridge United 53%X 26%21% Wigan Athletic · 2

    Analysis: Cambridge UnitedWigan Athletic

    Oscar Nilsson · · How the predictions work

    Cambridge United have a 53% chance of victory against Wigan Athletic, offering an enticing prospect for punters. Despite their current three-game losing streak, the model sees Cambridge as the more likely winners, albeit in a game with muted goal-scoring expectations. The numbers suggest a 1-0 victory for the home side is on the cards, with a 14% likelihood, overshadowing any chance of goal-ridden chaos given the over 2.5 goals probability lurking at just 40%.

    The expected goals (xG) tell a story of Cambridge United's offensive edge, projecting them at 1.42 to Wigan Athletic's 0.86. Still, the weather forecast remains silent and won’t muddy these figures. But don’t let the head-to-head record, with only two matches since 2023, sway your judgment too much. Each side has claimed a win, but this minuscule sample bears little weight compared to the form and xG metrics.

    Wigan Athletic, with only a 21% shot at coming away with the win, look unlikely to snap up three points. The chance of both teams scoring sits at 44%, indicating a tilt towards a more cagey affair. Even a 1-1 draw holds a modest 13% probability, with a goalless stalemate not far behind. For those eyeing the betting markets, under 2.5 goals might pique interest, considering the odds.

    Cambridge United at Pinnacle’s odds of 2.33 shines with a notable 24% edge, marking it as the standout play for value seekers. Similar value can be found with Betsafe and Betsson, both offering 2.32 odds. The analysis leans heavily towards Cambridge, not just for their likelihood of winning but also for the juicy value proposition they present. Forget the recent slump; the smart money suggests a bounce-back at Abbey Stadium.

    Cambridge UnitedCambridge United
    Form LWLLL
    Key players
    • Josh StokesLWxG 0.30 · xT 0.13
    • Ryan LoftFxG 0.14 · xT 0.04
    • Dan NlunduluFxG 0.50 · xT 0.05
    Wigan AthleticWigan Athletic
    Form WWDLL
    League ranking xG #18xGA #17xT #17xP/match #17Points #16
    Key players
    • Fraser MurrayRWxG 0.12 · xT 0.18
    • Dara James Morgan CostelloeFxG 0.33 · xT 0.03
    • Callum WrightLWxG 0.12 · xT 0.08

    Match prediction: Cambridge UnitedWigan Athletic

    Predicted score matrix

    Wigan Athletic
    Cambridge United
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–010.7%
    0–18.5%
    0–23.8%
    0–31.1%
    0–4+0.3%
    1
    1–014.2%
    1–112.9%
    1–25.3%
    1–31.5%
    1–4+0.4%
    2
    2–010.3%
    2–18.8%
    2–23.8%
    2–31.1%
    2–4+0.3%
    3
    3–04.9%
    3–14.2%
    3–21.8%
    3–30.5%
    3–4+0.1%
    4+
    4+–02.4%
    4+–12.0%
    4+–20.9%
    4+–30.2%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-014%
    2. 2.1-113%
    3. 3.0-011%
    4. 4.2-010%
    5. 5.2-19%
    Expected goals
    1,420,86
    Both teams to score
    44%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,3
    Under 2,560%
    @1.63
    Over 2,540%
    @2.26

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Cambridge United to win53%
    • Under 3.5 goals81%

    Combined probability

    38%

    Fair odds

    2.61

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Cambridge United to win53%
    • Under 2.5 goals60%
    • Benjamin Leo Knight to score30%

    Combined probability

    7%

    Fair odds

    13.54

    Result and goals are priced jointly from the matrix; the scorer is the model's most likely in the picked side.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score44%
    • Over 2.5 goals40%
    • Benjamin Leo Knight to score30%
    • Jensen Guy Weir to be booked20%

    Combined probability

    2%

    Fair odds

    54.31

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals — combined with the match's most likely scorer and card candidate.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · Cambridge United53% probability@2.46PinnacleEV+31%
    • 1 · Cambridge United53% probability@2.38BetsafeEV+26%
    • 1 · Cambridge United53% probability@2.38BetssonEV+26%
    Bookmaker1 · Cambridge UnitedX2 · Wigan Athletic
    Betsafe
    EV+ 26%
    2.38
    3.102.98
    Betsson
    EV+ 26%
    2.38
    3.102.98
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 26%
    2.38
    3.102.98
    Pinnacle
    EV+ 31%
    2.46
    3.133.01

    Odds updated 13 Aug, 14:35

    Odds movement

    1+6 %
    42 %37 %

    2.332.46

    X0 %
    33 %28 %

    3.133.13

    2-6 %
    33 %28 %

    3.213.01

    Over 2,50 %
    44 %39 %

    2.252.26

    Pinnacle · 2 recorded price levels · 11/08/2026 → 13/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Cambridge United 1Draw 0Wigan Athletic 1
    Goals: 21 (⌀ 1,5)

    Head-to-head based on League One data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Cambridge United have lost 3 in a row.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Cambridge United
    Wigan Athletic
    When goals are scored and conceded 2025
    Wigan Athletic (4958)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Wigan Athletic
    William Stewart Aimson: 223 passningar, xT 0.39AimsonJames Carragher: 186 passningar, xT 0.57CarragherJason John Kerr: 162 passningar, xT 0.19KerrMatt Smith: 150 passningar, xT 0.2SmithFraser Murray: 138 passningar, xT 0.28MurrayJensen Guy Weir: 135 passningar, xT 0.29WeirCallum Wright: 127 passningar, xT 0.05WrightRaphael Borges Rodrigues: 83 passningar, xT 0.43RodriguesSam Tickle: 78 passningar, xT 0.15TickleMorgan Alexander Fox: 62 passningar, xT 0.05FoxDara James Morgan Costelloe: 22 passningar, xT -0.06Costelloe
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Wigan Athletic
    William Stewart Aimson: 223 passningar, xT 0.39AimsonJames Carragher: 186 passningar, xT 0.57CarragherJason John Kerr: 162 passningar, xT 0.19KerrMatt Smith: 150 passningar, xT 0.2SmithFraser Murray: 138 passningar, xT 0.28MurrayJensen Guy Weir: 135 passningar, xT 0.29WeirCallum Wright: 127 passningar, xT 0.05WrightRaphael Borges Rodrigues: 83 passningar, xT 0.43RodriguesSam Tickle: 78 passningar, xT 0.15TickleMorgan Alexander Fox: 62 passningar, xT 0.05FoxDara James Morgan Costelloe: 22 passningar, xT -0.06Costelloe
    The goalkeepersCambridge UnitedSam Tickle (Wigan Athletic)
    Saves120
    Save %68%
    xG prevented44%
    Claims0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Cambridge United vs Wigan Athletic according to our model?

    The model gives Cambridge United a 53% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Cambridge United 53%, draw 26%, Wigan Athletic 21%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-0 at 14% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 40% and under at 60%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 44% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.