EFL League TwoHighbury Stadium, Fleetwood14°14 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Fleetwood TownFleetwood TownLow block & direct
    vs
    GillinghamGillinghamCounter-attacks & crosses
    The model's lean: 1 · Fleetwood Town (52%)

    Fleetwood TownGillingham · EFL League Two

    1 · Fleetwood Town 52%X 26%22% Gillingham · 2

    Analysis: Fleetwood TownGillingham

    Marcus Johansson · · Analysis from the match model · How the predictions work

    Fleetwood Town's unbeaten five-match run in the league casts a long shadow over Gillingham's prospects. The numbers tell a story of dominance, with Fleetwood holding a 52% probability of winning as the model's lean tilts firmly towards them. Despite a head-to-head sample that is notably small, Fleetwood's record against Gillingham since 2023 — two wins and two draws — reinforces their current form advantage.

    Fleetwood Town leads in expected goals with a 1.56 to Gillingham’s 0.98, hinting at the home side's ability to craft more meaningful chances. Their playing style, characterized by low defence and direct play, seems well-suited to dismantle Gillingham's counter-attack and cross-heavy approach. The most likely scorelines of 1-1 and 1-0 indicate a tight encounter, yet they subtly favour Fleetwood, who also exhibit superior xPoints and xGA per match metrics.

    Gillingham’s defensive frailties are laid bare with an alarming xGA of 3.0 per match, a stark contrast to Fleetwood's more manageable 1.9. This defensive discrepancy could be pivotal, especially considering Fleetwood's ability to exploit such weaknesses through direct play. The over/under 2.5 goals marker stands at 47%, suggesting a game that might not be goal-laden, aligning with the balanced both-teams-to-score probability of 50%.

    Fleetwood Town offers tantalizing value at odds of 2.08 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, as the model estimates a 52% win probability — a notable 7% edge. For those with a betting inclination, backing Fleetwood at these odds is the sharpest angle, providing an advantageous blend of form, probability, and bookmaker oversight.

    Fleetwood TownFleetwood Town
    Form WDDDW
    League ranking xG #14xGA #19xT #10xP/match #13Points #9
    Key players
    • William James DaviesFxG 0.21 · xT -0.01
    • Mark HelmLWxG 0.06 · xT 0.30
    • Lewis McCannLWxG 0.26 · xT 0.38
    GillinghamGillingham
    Form LLLWL
    League ranking xG #15xGA #24xT #12xP/match #16Points #23
    Key players
    • Ronan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman HaleFxG 0.29 · xT -0.01
    • James Robert BrophyLWxG 0.03 · xT 0.22
    • Zane AlbarusFxG 0.00 · xT 0.02

    Match prediction: Fleetwood TownGillingham

    Predicted score matrix

    Gillingham
    Fleetwood Town
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–08.2%
    0–17.4%
    0–23.8%
    0–31.3%
    0–4+0.4%
    1
    1–011.9%
    1–112.4%
    1–25.9%
    1–31.9%
    1–4+0.6%
    2
    2–09.6%
    2–19.4%
    2–24.6%
    2–31.5%
    2–4+0.5%
    3
    3–05.0%
    3–14.9%
    3–22.4%
    3–30.8%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–02.7%
    4+–12.7%
    4+–21.3%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.1-012%
    3. 3.2-010%
    4. 4.2-19%
    5. 5.0-08%
    Expected goals
    1,560,98
    Both teams to score
    50%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,5
    Under 2,553%
    @1.82
    Over 2,547%
    @1.92

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Fleetwood Town to win52%
    • Under 3.5 goals75%

    Combined probability

    36%

    Fair odds

    2.79

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Fleetwood Town to win52%
    • Under 2.5 goals53%
    • Chedwyn Michael Evans to score33%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score50%
    • Over 2.5 goals47%
    • Chedwyn Michael Evans to score33%
    • Armani George Little to be booked17%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · Fleetwood Town52% probability@1.98BetsafeEV+2%reference odds
    • 1 · Fleetwood Town52% probability@1.98BetssonEV+2%reference odds
    • 1 · Fleetwood Town52% probability@1.98NordicbetEV+2%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Fleetwood TownX2 · Gillingham
    Betsafe
    EV+ 2%
    1.98
    3.303.70
    Betsson
    EV+ 2%
    1.98
    3.303.70
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 2%
    1.98
    3.303.70

    Odds updated 18 Aug, 18:36

    Odds movement

    1-5 %
    48 %43 %

    2.081.98

    X-3 %
    30 %25 %

    3.403.30

    2+10 %
    30 %25 %

    3.353.70

    Over 2,50 %
    51 %46 %

    1.921.92

    Betsson · 9 recorded price levels · 15/08/2026 → 18/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Fleetwood Town 2Draw 2Gillingham 0
    Goals: 53 (⌀ 2)

    Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Fleetwood Town are unbeaten in their last 5 league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Fleetwood Town
    Gillingham
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Fleetwood Town (10)
    Gillingham (03)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Fleetwood Town
    Harrison Neal: 24 passningar, xT 0NealRhys Bennett: 22 passningar, xT 0.06BennettMark Helm: 21 passningar, xT 0.29HelmJay Lynch: 19 passningar, xT 0.07LynchShaun Rooney: 17 passningar, xT 0.03RooneyFinley Potter: 17 passningar, xT 0.08PotterLewis McCann: 17 passningar, xT 0.04McCannWilliam James Davies: 10 passningar, xT -0.01DaviesKane Angelis Gavin Thompson-Sommers: 9 passningar, xT -0.03Thompson-SommersAndrew Francis Cannon: 7 passningar, xT 0.08CannonRaffaele Cirino: 6 passningar, xT 0.04Cirino
    Gillingham
    James Robert Brophy: 31 passningar, xT 0.24BrophyOmar Jerome Beckles: 30 passningar, xT 0.01BecklesRobbie Mckenzie: 19 passningar, xT -0.03MckenzieArmani Little: 18 passningar, xT 0.32LittleKadeem Raymond Mathurin-Harris: 17 passningar, xT 0.09Mathurin-HarrisRonan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman Hale: 15 passningar, xT -0.02HaleLiam Craig Gordon: 13 passningar, xT 0.02GordonZane Albarus: 13 passningar, xT 0.02AlbarusAshley Maynard-Brewer: 13 passningar, xT 0.07Maynard-BrewerAndy Smith: 13 passningar, xT -0.03SmithNicholas Scott Edward Freeman: 12 passningar, xT 0.27Freeman
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Fleetwood Town
    Harrison Neal: 24 passningar, xT 0NealRhys Bennett: 22 passningar, xT 0.06BennettMark Helm: 21 passningar, xT 0.29HelmJay Lynch: 19 passningar, xT 0.07LynchShaun Rooney: 17 passningar, xT 0.03RooneyFinley Potter: 17 passningar, xT 0.08PotterLewis McCann: 17 passningar, xT 0.04McCannWilliam James Davies: 10 passningar, xT -0.01DaviesKane Angelis Gavin Thompson-Sommers: 9 passningar, xT -0.03Thompson-SommersAndrew Francis Cannon: 7 passningar, xT 0.08CannonRaffaele Cirino: 6 passningar, xT 0.04Cirino
    Gillingham
    James Robert Brophy: 31 passningar, xT 0.24BrophyOmar Jerome Beckles: 30 passningar, xT 0.01BecklesRobbie Mckenzie: 19 passningar, xT -0.03MckenzieArmani Little: 18 passningar, xT 0.32LittleKadeem Raymond Mathurin-Harris: 17 passningar, xT 0.09Mathurin-HarrisRonan Aiden Connolly Shea Chapman Hale: 15 passningar, xT -0.02HaleLiam Craig Gordon: 13 passningar, xT 0.02GordonZane Albarus: 13 passningar, xT 0.02AlbarusAshley Maynard-Brewer: 13 passningar, xT 0.07Maynard-BrewerAndy Smith: 13 passningar, xT -0.03SmithNicholas Scott Edward Freeman: 12 passningar, xT 0.27Freeman

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceFleetwood TownGillingham
    Points30
    xPoints1.30.8
    xG per match1.41.3
    xGA per match1.93
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.240
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.550.41
    Playing styleFleetwood TownGillingham
    Build-up efficiency0.340.33
    Field tilt0.240.52
    xT per match1.10.97
    xTA per match10.78
    Won balls, offensive half2537
    Pressing intensity0.230.28
    Pressing efficiency0.240.28
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.30.3
    Entries into the box per match913
    Entries into the box against1514
    Pass completion %0.590.59
    Pass completion % under pressure0.60.61
    Passes per match173203
    Passes against per match446288
    Switches of play per match9.817.1
    Long balls per match3232
    Set piecesFleetwood TownGillingham
    xG from free kicks0.050.04
    Corners per match0.985.7
    Corners against per match4.98.6
    xG per corner0.020.01
    xGA per corner against0.070.05
    First touch, offensive corners %00.33
    First touch, defensive corners %0.60.44
    OtherFleetwood TownGillingham
    Throw-in control0.70.65
    The goalkeepersJay Lynch (Fleetwood Town)Omar Jerome Beckles (Gillingham)
    Saves32
    Save %100%100%
    xG prevented100%100%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Fleetwood Town vs Gillingham according to our model?

    The model gives Fleetwood Town a 52% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Fleetwood Town 52%, draw 26%, Gillingham 22%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 47% and under at 53%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 50% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.