01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Salford City or draw (1X)67%
- Under 3.5 goals77%
EFL League TwoPeninsula Stadium, Salford15°12 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
Salford City may find themselves scratching their heads as they prepare to face Chesterfield, a team they've yet to beat since 2023 in their limited encounters. Four matches, one draw and three losses — the head-to-head might not paint a bright picture for Salford, but sample size here is small. Instead, the betting brain must lean into the numbers that extend beyond these modest skirmishes.
Salford City steps into this match with a modest 41% model probability of winning, a slight nod over Chesterfield's 33%. Nonetheless, Chesterfield presents a tantalizing proposition for the sharp-eyed punters. With an expected goals tally favoring Chesterfield (1.9 to Salford's 1.1), and their more robust xPoints (1.4 against Salford’s 0.6), Chesterfield seems primed to challenge Salford's home advantage. These metrics, particularly Chesterfield's proficiency at creating chances within eight seconds of gaining possession (0.55 xG), suggest they might unlock Salford’s defenses more adeptly.
Chesterfield, with their penchant for possession control, clash stylistically with Salford City’s counter-attacking and crossing approach. What makes this match intriguing, however, are the underlying values. Salford’s expected goals against (1.8 xGA) suggests vulnerabilities that Chesterfield could exploit — a strategic advantage further highlighted by the away side's prowess in high-tempo transitions.
Despite a model suggesting a lean towards Salford City, the value lies in backing Chesterfield away at odds of 3.45, as offered by Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet — each presenting a substantial 13% edge. Given the most likely scorelines reflect a tightly contested affair, with 1-1 at 13% and a 1-0 either way hovering around 10%, a low-scoring match feels apt. The forecast suggests a tactical battle possibly ending 1-0 to Chesterfield, where the shrewd punter might find joy in both the outright market and a sneaky under 2.5 goals at 44%, mindful that the number-crunching already accounts for all the elements in play.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Salford City | X | 2 · Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.02 | 3.30 | EV+ 16% 3.55 |
| Betsson | 2.02 | 3.30 | EV+ 16% 3.55 |
| Nordicbet | 2.02 | 3.30 | EV+ 16% 3.55 |
Odds updated 18 Aug, 17:36
2.08 → 2.02
3.20 → 3.30
3.55 → 3.55
2.18 → 2.02
Betsson · 12 recorded price levels · 15/08/2026 → 18/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Salford City | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0 | 0 |
| xPoints | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| xG per match | 1.1 | 1.9 |
| xGA per match | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.14 | 0.55 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.92 | 0.24 |
| Playing style | Salford City | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.37 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.38 | 0.76 |
| xT per match | 0.4 | 1 |
| xTA per match | 0.73 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 19 | 19 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.27 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.48 | 0.4 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.52 | 0.5 |
| Entries into the box per match | 11 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 16 | 9 |
| Pass completion % | 0.63 | 0.76 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.54 | 0.76 |
| Passes per match | 224 | 446 |
| Passes against per match | 154 | 173 |
| Switches of play per match | 21.6 | 46 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 39 |
| Set pieces | Salford City | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.18 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 4.9 | 4.9 |
| Corners against per match | 5.9 | 0.98 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.5 | 1 |
| Other | Salford City | Chesterfield |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.65 | 0.76 |
| The goalkeepers | William James Norris (Salford City) | Ryan Thomas William Boot (Chesterfield) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 4 | 6 |
| Save % | 57% | 86% |
| xG prevented | 41% | 97% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Salford City a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Salford City 41%, draw 26%, Chesterfield 33%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 44% and under at 56%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 50% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.