EFL League TwoNew Meadow, Shrewsbury14°0,3 mm10 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Shrewsbury TownShrewsbury TownCounter-attacks & crosses
    vs
    BarnetBarnetBalanced & physical
    The model's lean: 2 · Barnet (53%)Best value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 1.82 (+0 %)

    Shrewsbury TownBarnet · EFL League Two

    1 · Shrewsbury Town 22%X 25%53% Barnet · 2

    Analysis: Shrewsbury TownBarnet

    Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work

    Barnet's six-game winning streak casts a long shadow over Shrewsbury Town as they prepare to face off in League Two. The model heavily tips Barnet with a 53% chance of victory, and this momentum is underpinned by their ability to find the net in 11 consecutive league matches. Shrewsbury Town, meanwhile, can only point to a small head-to-head sample since 2023 where they've managed a win and a draw against Barnet, a record that hardly outweighs current form and statistical trends.

    Shrewsbury Town, known for their counter-attacking style and reliance on crosses, might find it difficult to break down Barnet's balanced and physical approach. Both teams boast decent xG readings, 2.1 for Shrewsbury and 1.8 for Barnet, but Barnet's tighter xGA of 1.1 suggests they might better limit opportunities. The model's expected goals of 0.93 for Shrewsbury against Barnet's 1.54 further buttresses the expectation of Barnet's dominance.

    Barnet starts with an edge not just in form but also in the betting market, offering value at 1.92 odds with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet. Each of these offers a 1% edge over the model's assessment. This tilts the balance even further towards Barnet, making them the more tantalizing punt for the astute bettor.

    The numbers suggest a low-scoring affair, with a 45% lean against over 2.5 goals and a 48% chance for both teams to score. The most likely scorelines—0-1 (13%) and 1-1 (12%)—point to Barnet sneaking a result. Look for a 0-1 finish, with Barnet's recent form and Shrewsbury’s stylistic challenges indicating a narrow victory. The sharp punter should eye Barnet at 1.92 with confidence, as the model's numbers and Barnet's relentless winning streak align towards this favorable outcome.

    Shrewsbury TownShrewsbury Town
    Form WDDLL
    League ranking xG #4xGA #9xT #5xP/match #14Points #21
    Key players
    • Samuel Raymond ClucasLWxG 0.06 · xT 0.14
    • Tom SangRWxG 0.06 · xT 0.11
    • Ismeal KabiaRWxG 0.04 · xT 0.15
    BarnetBarnet
    Form WWWWW
    League ranking xG #7xGA #8xT #15xP/match #4Points #3
    Key players
    • Kabongo TshimangaFxG 0.18 · xT 0.01
    • Charlie James LakinCMxG 0.48 · xT 0.11
    • Kane John SmithLWBxG 0.17 · xT 0.08

    Match prediction: Shrewsbury TownBarnet

    Predicted score matrix

    Barnet
    Shrewsbury Town
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–08.8%
    0–112.6%
    0–210.0%
    0–35.2%
    0–4+2.8%
    1
    1–07.5%
    1–112.5%
    1–29.3%
    1–34.8%
    1–4+2.6%
    2
    2–03.7%
    2–15.6%
    2–24.4%
    2–32.2%
    2–4+1.2%
    3
    3–01.1%
    3–11.8%
    3–21.4%
    3–30.7%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–00.3%
    4+–10.5%
    4+–20.4%
    4+–30.2%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.0-113%
    2. 2.1-112%
    3. 3.0-210%
    4. 4.1-29%
    5. 5.0-09%
    Expected goals
    0,931,54
    Both teams to score
    48%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,5
    Under 2,555%
    @1.82EV+0%
    Over 2,545%
    @1.92

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Barnet to win53%
    • Under 3.5 goals76%

    Combined probability

    37%

    Fair odds

    2.69

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Barnet to win53%
    • Under 2.5 goals55%
    • Kabongo Tshimanga to score26%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score48%
    • Over 2.5 goals45%
    • Kabongo Tshimanga to score26%
    • Thomas Roy Sang to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.555% probability@1.82BetsafeEV+0%reference odds
    • Under 2.555% probability@1.82BetssonEV+0%reference odds
    • Under 2.555% probability@1.82NordicbetEV+0%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Shrewsbury TownX2 · Barnet
    Betsafe3.953.401.88
    Betsson3.953.401.88
    Nordicbet3.953.401.88

    Odds updated 18 Aug, 06:36

    Odds movement

    1+7 %
    27 %22 %

    3.703.95

    X-1 %
    30 %25 %

    3.453.40

    2-2 %
    51 %46 %

    1.921.88

    Over 2,50 %
    51 %46 %

    1.921.92

    Betsson · 13 recorded price levels · 15/08/2026 → 18/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Shrewsbury Town 1Draw 1Barnet 0
    Goals: 31 (⌀ 2)

    Head-to-head based on League Two data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Barnet come into this round on 6 straight wins.
    • Barnet have scored in 11 consecutive league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Shrewsbury Town
    Barnet
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Shrewsbury Town (02)
    Barnet (31)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Shrewsbury Town
    Kevin Berkoe: 38 passningar, xT 0.04BerkoeJoshua Andrew Bernard Ruffels: 30 passningar, xT 0.05RuffelsArkell Nicholas Cecil Jude-Boyd: 29 passningar, xT 0.7Jude-BoydLuca Anthony Hoole: 29 passningar, xT 0.08HooleWilliam Sam Douglas Harry Boyle: 26 passningar, xT 0.17BoyleTom Sang: 23 passningar, xT 0.15SangWilliam Michael Brook: 22 passningar, xT 0.04BrookWill Gary: 16 passningar, xT -0.02GaryIsaac Andrew Fletcher: 14 passningar, xT 0.01FletcherJay Turner-Cooke: 9 passningar, xT 0.02Turner-CookeGeorge Robert Lawrence Lloyd: 6 passningar, xT -0.01Lloyd
    Barnet
    Nnamdi Ofoborh: 24 passningar, xT 0.16OfoborhIdris Sheka Kanu: 20 passningar, xT 0.15KanuCharlie James Lakin: 18 passningar, xT 0.07LakinNikola Tavares: 17 passningar, xT 0.01TavaresKane John Smith: 15 passningar, xT 0.07SmithMatthew Aidan Cox: 13 passningar, xT 0.06CoxAdam Nicholas Senior: 11 passningar, xT 0.05SeniorDaniele James Collinge: 9 passningar, xT 0.07CollingeThomas Andrew Knowles: 8 passningar, xT -0.02KnowlesKabongo Tshimanga: 8 passningar, xT 0.01TshimangaOisín Jack Gallagher: 6 passningar, xT 0Gallagher
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Shrewsbury Town
    Kevin Berkoe: 38 passningar, xT 0.04BerkoeJoshua Andrew Bernard Ruffels: 30 passningar, xT 0.05RuffelsArkell Nicholas Cecil Jude-Boyd: 29 passningar, xT 0.7Jude-BoydLuca Anthony Hoole: 29 passningar, xT 0.08HooleWilliam Sam Douglas Harry Boyle: 26 passningar, xT 0.17BoyleTom Sang: 23 passningar, xT 0.15SangWilliam Michael Brook: 22 passningar, xT 0.04BrookWill Gary: 16 passningar, xT -0.02GaryIsaac Andrew Fletcher: 14 passningar, xT 0.01FletcherJay Turner-Cooke: 9 passningar, xT 0.02Turner-CookeGeorge Robert Lawrence Lloyd: 6 passningar, xT -0.01Lloyd
    Barnet
    Nnamdi Ofoborh: 24 passningar, xT 0.16OfoborhIdris Sheka Kanu: 20 passningar, xT 0.15KanuCharlie James Lakin: 18 passningar, xT 0.07LakinNikola Tavares: 17 passningar, xT 0.01TavaresKane John Smith: 15 passningar, xT 0.07SmithMatthew Aidan Cox: 13 passningar, xT 0.06CoxAdam Nicholas Senior: 11 passningar, xT 0.05SeniorDaniele James Collinge: 9 passningar, xT 0.07CollingeThomas Andrew Knowles: 8 passningar, xT -0.02KnowlesKabongo Tshimanga: 8 passningar, xT 0.01TshimangaOisín Jack Gallagher: 6 passningar, xT 0Gallagher

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceShrewsbury TownBarnet
    Points03
    xPoints1.32.2
    xG per match2.11.8
    xGA per match1.21.1
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.050.92
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.360.14
    Playing styleShrewsbury TownBarnet
    Build-up efficiency0.330.35
    Field tilt0.650.62
    xT per match1.30.73
    xTA per match0.570.4
    Won balls, offensive half3636
    Pressing intensity0.20.22
    Pressing efficiency0.450.46
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.480.45
    Entries into the box per match1416
    Entries into the box against711
    Pass completion %0.610.51
    Pass completion % under pressure0.570.52
    Passes per match263154
    Passes against per match186224
    Switches of play per match23.78.8
    Long balls per match3524
    Set piecesShrewsbury TownBarnet
    xG from free kicks0.490.12
    Corners per match5.25.9
    Corners against per match3.14.9
    xG per corner00.01
    xGA per corner against0.040.01
    First touch, offensive corners %0.40.5
    First touch, defensive corners %0.670.2
    OtherShrewsbury TownBarnet
    Throw-in control0.790.71
    The goalkeepersWilliam Michael Brook (Shrewsbury Town)Daniele James Collinge (Barnet)
    Saves21
    Save %50%100%
    xG prevented33%100%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Shrewsbury Town vs Barnet according to our model?

    The model gives Barnet a 53% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Shrewsbury Town 22%, draw 25%, Barnet 53%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 0-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 45% and under at 55%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 48% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.