J1 LeagueKashima Soccer Stadium, Kashima24°19 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Kashima AntlersKashima AntlersPossession control
    vs
    Nagoya GrampusNagoya GrampusPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Kashima Antlers (56%)Best value by the model: Over 2,5 @ 2.01 (+3 %)

    Kashima AntlersNagoya Grampus · J1 League

    1 · Kashima Antlers 56%X 24%20% Nagoya Grampus · 2

    Analysis: Kashima AntlersNagoya Grampus

    Marcus Johansson · · How the predictions work

    Kashima Antlers have established themselves as formidable contenders, not just this season but especially against Nagoya Grampus, with a remarkable 4 wins in their last 6 encounters. While it's a small sample size, it lays a psychological foundation that the Antlers will likely leverage. Their current form is sizzling, riding on the back of 4 consecutive victories, and they have a knack for dominating at home, with a 56% win rate over 55 matches. Coupled with an expected goals tally of 1.76 compared to Nagoya’s 0.97, the Antlers seem primed to extend their streak.

    Kashima Antlers' style of possession control matches Nagoya's, but the Antlers execute it with greater efficacy. Despite both teams opting for a similar tactical approach, Kashima consistently yields better results. The model underlines this, giving them a 56% probability of winning, which dwarfs Nagoya Grampus' mere 20%. The most likely outcomes—1-1 and 1-0—notably point to Kashima's advantage, especially given their home prowess and Nagoya’s lackluster form.

    Nagoya Grampus, on the other hand, are struggling to find a foothold this season, yet they might draw some solace from their parallel defensive statistics. Both teams average 1.6 expected goals against per match, but Nagoya's attack, generating only 0.97 xG, doesn’t bode well for an upset. With the Antlers also enjoying a lead in both actual and expected points (3 vs. 0 and 1.1 vs. 0.6 respectively), Nagoya will need more than just possession to turn the tide.

    With the weather remaining a non-factor, the match could lean towards a tighter scoreline, but there's a betting angle worth considering. The over 2.5 goals market provides a sliver of value at odds of 2.01 with Pinnacle. The model rates this at 51%, giving a 3% edge—subtle yet enticing. In all likelihood, Kashima Antlers should pull through with a 2-0 victory, rewarding those brave enough to back the over.

    Kashima AntlersKashima Antlers
    Form DWWWW
    League ranking xG #2xGA #15xT #8xP/match #12Points #4
    Key players
    • Leo CearaFxG 1.04 · xT 0.21
    • Ikuma SekigawaCBxG 0.02 · xT 0.09
    • Naomichi UedaCBxG 0.00 · xT 0.13
    Nagoya GrampusNagoya Grampus
    Form LLLWL
    League ranking xG #14xGA #14xT #3xP/match #18Points #17
    Key players
    • Mateus dos Santos CastroFxG 0.22 · xT 0.08
    • Yuya YamagishiFxG 0.24 · xT 0.09
    • Sho InagakiCMxG 0.26 · xT 0.07

    Match prediction: Kashima AntlersNagoya Grampus

    Predicted score matrix

    Nagoya Grampus
    Kashima Antlers
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–06.9%
    0–16.0%
    0–23.1%
    0–31.0%
    0–4+0.3%
    1
    1–011.2%
    1–111.5%
    1–25.4%
    1–31.7%
    1–4+0.5%
    2
    2–010.1%
    2–19.8%
    2–24.7%
    2–31.5%
    2–4+0.5%
    3
    3–05.9%
    3–15.7%
    3–22.8%
    3–30.9%
    3–4+0.3%
    4+
    4+–03.9%
    4+–13.7%
    4+–21.8%
    4+–30.6%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.1-011%
    3. 3.2-010%
    4. 4.2-110%
    5. 5.0-07%
    Expected goals
    1,760,97
    Both teams to score
    52%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,7
    Under 2,549%
    @1.81
    Over 2,551%
    @2.01EV+3%

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Kashima Antlers to win56%
    • Over 1.5 goals76%

    Combined probability

    44%

    Fair odds

    2.25

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Kashima Antlers to win56%
    • Over 2.5 goals51%
    • Yuma Suzuki to score31%

    Combined probability

    11%

    Fair odds

    9.40

    Result and goals are priced jointly from the matrix; the scorer is the model's most likely in the picked side.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score52%
    • Over 2.5 goals51%
    • Yuma Suzuki to score31%
    • Haruya Fujii to be booked23%

    Combined probability

    3%

    Fair odds

    34.81

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals — combined with the match's most likely scorer and card candidate.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Over 2.551% probability@2.01PinnacleEV+3%
    Bookmaker1 · Kashima AntlersX2 · Nagoya Grampus
    Betsafe1.753.454.45
    Betsson1.753.454.45
    Nordicbet1.753.454.45
    Pinnacle1.773.644.62

    Odds updated 11 Aug, 04:54

    Odds movement

    1+2 %
    56 %51 %

    1.741.77

    X-1 %
    28 %23 %

    3.683.64

    2-3 %
    23 %18 %

    4.744.62

    Over 2,5+1 %
    50 %45 %

    2.002.01

    Pinnacle · 3 recorded price levels · 08/08/2026 → 11/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    6 matches
    Kashima Antlers 4Draw 1Nagoya Grampus 1
    Goals: 101 (⌀ 1,8)

    Head-to-head based on J1 League data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Kashima Antlers dominate this fixture historically: 4 wins to 1 in 6 meetings.
    • Kashima Antlers come into this round on 4 straight wins.
    • Kashima Antlers win 56% of their home matches all-time (55 played).
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Kashima Antlers
    Nagoya Grampus
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Kashima Antlers (43)
    Nagoya Grampus (01)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Kashima Antlers
    Naomichi Ueda: 59 passningar, xT 0.13UedaIkuma Sekigawa: 56 passningar, xT 0.1SekigawaRikuto Hirose: 52 passningar, xT 0.08HiroseMatheus Bueno: 49 passningar, xT 0.05BuenoRyoya Ogawa: 49 passningar, xT 0.03OgawaKento Misao: 43 passningar, xT 0.02MisaoYan Matheus: 30 passningar, xT 0.29MatheusLeo Ceara: 24 passningar, xT 0.23CearaTomoki Hayakawa: 22 passningar, xT 0.04HayakawaGaku Shibasaki: 21 passningar, xT 0.02ShibasakiYuma Suzuki: 20 passningar, xT -0.05Suzuki
    Nagoya Grampus
    Tomoki Takamine: 103 passningar, xT 0.53TakamineHaruya Fujii: 74 passningar, xT 0.24FujiiSho Inagaki: 72 passningar, xT 0.36InagakiKatsuhiro Nakayama: 60 passningar, xT 0.18NakayamaAlexandre Pisano: 57 passningar, xT 0.07PisanoTeruki Hara: 54 passningar, xT 0.07HaraYuki Nogami: 42 passningar, xT 0.01NogamiTsukasa Morishima: 21 passningar, xT 0.02MorishimaYudai Kimura: 20 passningar, xT 0.01KimuraMateus dos Santos Castro: 14 passningar, xT 0CastroHidemasa Koda: 9 passningar, xT 0.01Koda
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Kashima Antlers
    Naomichi Ueda: 59 passningar, xT 0.13UedaIkuma Sekigawa: 56 passningar, xT 0.1SekigawaRikuto Hirose: 52 passningar, xT 0.08HiroseMatheus Bueno: 49 passningar, xT 0.05BuenoRyoya Ogawa: 49 passningar, xT 0.03OgawaKento Misao: 43 passningar, xT 0.02MisaoYan Matheus: 30 passningar, xT 0.29MatheusLeo Ceara: 24 passningar, xT 0.23CearaTomoki Hayakawa: 22 passningar, xT 0.04HayakawaGaku Shibasaki: 21 passningar, xT 0.02ShibasakiYuma Suzuki: 20 passningar, xT -0.05Suzuki
    Nagoya Grampus
    Tomoki Takamine: 103 passningar, xT 0.53TakamineHaruya Fujii: 74 passningar, xT 0.24FujiiSho Inagaki: 72 passningar, xT 0.36InagakiKatsuhiro Nakayama: 60 passningar, xT 0.18NakayamaAlexandre Pisano: 57 passningar, xT 0.07PisanoTeruki Hara: 54 passningar, xT 0.07HaraYuki Nogami: 42 passningar, xT 0.01NogamiTsukasa Morishima: 21 passningar, xT 0.02MorishimaYudai Kimura: 20 passningar, xT 0.01KimuraMateus dos Santos Castro: 14 passningar, xT 0CastroHidemasa Koda: 9 passningar, xT 0.01Koda

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceKashima AntlersNagoya Grampus
    Points30
    xPoints1.10.6
    xG per match2.40.97
    xGA per match1.61.6
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.230.08
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.460.34
    Playing styleKashima AntlersNagoya Grampus
    Build-up efficiency0.30.31
    Field tilt0.710.79
    xT per match1.21.5
    xTA per match0.760.76
    Won balls, offensive half2122
    Pressing intensity0.230.24
    Pressing efficiency0.410.48
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.330.5
    Entries into the box per match1517
    Entries into the box against514
    Pass completion %0.770.82
    Pass completion % under pressure0.720.74
    Passes per match438558
    Passes against per match163136
    Switches of play per match41.951
    Long balls per match4753
    Set piecesKashima AntlersNagoya Grampus
    xG from free kicks0.240
    Corners per match8.213.3
    Corners against per match07.1
    xG per corner0.010.01
    xGA per corner against00
    First touch, offensive corners %0.440.31
    First touch, defensive corners %00.71
    OtherKashima AntlersNagoya Grampus
    Throw-in control0.690.92
    The goalkeepersNaomichi Ueda (Kashima Antlers)Alexandre Pisano (Nagoya Grampus)
    Saves15
    Save %100%83%
    xG prevented100%82%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Kashima Antlers vs Nagoya Grampus according to our model?

    The model gives Kashima Antlers a 56% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Kashima Antlers 56%, draw 24%, Nagoya Grampus 20%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 51% and under at 49%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 52% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.