J1 LeagueToyota Stadium, Toyota28°1,0 mm7 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Nagoya GrampusNagoya GrampusPossession control
    01
    Shimizu S-PulseShimizu S-PulsePossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · Nagoya Grampus (43%)Best value by the model: 2 · Shimizu S-Pulse @ 4.06 (+23 %)

    Nagoya Grampus vs Shimizu S-Pulse · J1 League

    1 · Nagoya Grampus 43%X 27%30% Shimizu S-Pulse · 2

    Analysis: Nagoya GrampusShimizu S-Pulse

    Erik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work

    The tension in this matchup lies in the contrast between current form and underlying metrics. Shimizu S-Pulse, despite being a point ahead in the table, are on a dire run, having lost their last three matches. This poor form could be pivotal when they face Nagoya Grampus, a team that the model favours with a 43% chance to win. Yet, it's not just form; the expected points (xPoints) tell a story of Nagoya's underlying strength, with a notable advantage of 56.2 over Shimizu's 45.2.

    Nagoya Grampus, with a possession control style, is likely to dictate the tempo. Their expected goals (xG) per match and expected goals against (xGA) both edge Shimizu, suggesting they are more efficient at both ends. While both sides share a similar xG of 1.3, it's Nagoya's slightly stingier defense—conceding an xGA of 1.2 compared to Shimizu's 1.5—that hints at their potential for a tighter grip on the match.

    The small head-to-head sample since 2023, consisting of just two matches, sees Nagoya undefeated with one win and a draw. While this sample is not large enough to override other data, it complements Nagoya's current model lean. In terms of goals, the forecast points to a fine balance; the probability for over 2.5 goals sits perfectly at 50%, and both teams to score is at 54%. However, with no weather disruptions anticipated, the model's numbers remain reliable.

    While the likely scorelines circle around 1-1 (12%) and 1-0 (10%), suggesting a close encounter, Shimizu's losing streak and lower xPoints cast doubt on their resilience. For the sharp bettor, there's a value angle in backing Shimizu S-Pulse at 3.39 with Pinnacle, where the model sees a 3% edge. Though Nagoya Grampus appears the safer outright pick, this value bet could appeal to those looking to capitalize on potential surprise.

    Nagoya GrampusNagoya Grampus
    Form DLLLW
    League ranking xG #8xGA #7xT #12xP/match #6Points #16
    Key players
    • Mateus dos Santos CastroFxG 0.22 · xT 0.08
    • Yuya YamagishiFxG 0.24 · xT 0.09
    • Sho InagakiCMxG 0.26 · xT 0.07
    Shimizu S-PulseShimizu S-Pulse
    Form LWLLL
    League ranking xG #13xGA #20xT #4xP/match #17Points #14
    Key players
    • Toshiki TakahashiFxG 0.44 · xT -0.01
    • Koya KitagawaFxG 0.42 · xT 0.04
    • Reon YamaharaLWxG 0.05 · xT 0.22
    Final score
    01
    The model missed the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Nagoya Grampus 43% · Draw 27% · Shimizu S-Pulse 30%

    Match prediction: Nagoya GrampusShimizu S-Pulse

    Predicted score matrix

    Shimizu S-Pulse
    Nagoya Grampus
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–07.3%
    0–17.7%
    0–24.6%
    0–31.8%
    0–4+0.7%
    1
    1–010.1%
    1–112.5%
    1–27.0%
    1–32.7%
    1–4+1.0%
    2
    2–07.9%
    2–19.2%
    2–25.3%
    2–32.0%
    2–4+0.8%
    3
    3–04.0%
    3–14.6%
    3–22.7%
    3–31.0%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–02.1%
    4+–12.4%
    4+–21.4%
    4+–30.5%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.1-010%
    3. 3.2-19%
    4. 4.2-08%
    5. 5.0-18%
    Expected goals
    1,511,16
    Both teams to score
    54%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,7
    Under 2,550%
    @1.99
    Over 2,550%
    @1.87

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Nagoya Grampus or draw (1X)71%
    • Under 3.5 goals72%

    Combined probability

    51%

    Fair odds

    1.96

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Nagoya Grampus or draw (1X)71%
    • Under 2.5 goals50%
    • Yuya Yamagishi to score28%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score54%
    • Over 2.5 goals50%
    • Yuya Yamagishi to score28%
    • Mateus Brunetti Valor to be booked19%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Shimizu S-Pulse30% probability@4.06PinnacleEV+23%reference odds
    • X · Draw27% probability@3.69PinnacleEV+0%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · Nagoya GrampusX2 · Shimizu S-Pulse
    Pinnacle1.89
    EV+ 0%
    3.69
    EV+ 23%
    4.06

    Odds updated 8 Aug, 10:09

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards a Nagoya Grampus win since 4 August — the odds have shortened from 2.06 to 1.89 (−8%).

    1-8 %
    53 %43 %

    2.061.89

    X+1 %
    31 %21 %

    3.643.69

    2+21 %
    31 %21 %

    3.354.06

    Over 2,5-1 %
    56 %46 %

    1.881.87

    Pinnacle · 12 recorded price levels · 04/08/2026 → 08/08/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Nagoya Grampus 1Draw 1Shimizu S-Pulse 0
    Goals: 41 (⌀ 2,5)

    Head-to-head based on J1 League data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • Shimizu S-Pulse have lost 3 in a row.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Nagoya Grampus
    Shimizu S-Pulse
    When goals are scored and conceded 2025
    Nagoya Grampus (4456)
    Shimizu S-Pulse (4151)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Nagoya Grampus
    Yota Sato: 220 passningar, xT 0.33SatoHaruya Fujii: 210 passningar, xT 0.3FujiiTsukasa Morishima: 207 passningar, xT 0.67MorishimaSho Inagaki: 189 passningar, xT 0.22InagakiTeruki Hara: 166 passningar, xT 0.36HaraRyuji Izumi: 149 passningar, xT 0.71IzumiTaichi Kikuchi: 125 passningar, xT 0.65KikuchiYohei Takeda: 82 passningar, xT 0.04TakedaYuki Nogami: 66 passningar, xT 0.12NogamiSoichiro Mori: 56 passningar, xT 0.08MoriKensuke Nagai: 44 passningar, xT 0.14Nagai
    Shimizu S-Pulse
    Matheus Bueno: 375 passningar, xT 0.61BuenoJelani Reshaun Sumiyoshi: 265 passningar, xT 0.39SumiyoshiReon Yamahara: 231 passningar, xT 1.79YamaharaSodai Hasukawa: 191 passningar, xT 0.09HasukawaYutaka Yoshida: 174 passningar, xT 0.4YoshidaTakashi Inui: 142 passningar, xT 0.29InuiShinya Yajima: 138 passningar, xT 0.46YajimaTogo Umeda: 107 passningar, xT 0.14UmedaSen Takagi: 99 passningar, xT 0.2TakagiJoão Victor da Vitória Fernandes: 96 passningar, xT 0.66FernandesKai Matsuzaki: 89 passningar, xT 0.55Matsuzaki
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Nagoya Grampus
    Yota Sato: 220 passningar, xT 0.33SatoHaruya Fujii: 210 passningar, xT 0.3FujiiTsukasa Morishima: 207 passningar, xT 0.67MorishimaSho Inagaki: 189 passningar, xT 0.22InagakiTeruki Hara: 166 passningar, xT 0.36HaraRyuji Izumi: 149 passningar, xT 0.71IzumiTaichi Kikuchi: 125 passningar, xT 0.65KikuchiYohei Takeda: 82 passningar, xT 0.04TakedaYuki Nogami: 66 passningar, xT 0.12NogamiSoichiro Mori: 56 passningar, xT 0.08MoriKensuke Nagai: 44 passningar, xT 0.14Nagai
    Shimizu S-Pulse
    Matheus Bueno: 375 passningar, xT 0.61BuenoJelani Reshaun Sumiyoshi: 265 passningar, xT 0.39SumiyoshiReon Yamahara: 231 passningar, xT 1.79YamaharaSodai Hasukawa: 191 passningar, xT 0.09HasukawaYutaka Yoshida: 174 passningar, xT 0.4YoshidaTakashi Inui: 142 passningar, xT 0.29InuiShinya Yajima: 138 passningar, xT 0.46YajimaTogo Umeda: 107 passningar, xT 0.14UmedaSen Takagi: 99 passningar, xT 0.2TakagiJoão Victor da Vitória Fernandes: 96 passningar, xT 0.66FernandesKai Matsuzaki: 89 passningar, xT 0.55Matsuzaki

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceNagoya GrampusShimizu S-Pulse
    Points4344
    xPoints56.245.2
    xG per match1.31.3
    xGA per match1.21.5
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.260.27
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.210.21
    Playing styleNagoya GrampusShimizu S-Pulse
    Build-up efficiency0.320.31
    Field tilt0.390.5
    xT per match0.851.1
    xTA per match0.81
    Won balls, offensive half2824
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.270.28
    Entries into the box per match1114
    Entries into the box against1114
    Passes per match311382
    Passes against per match357358
    Set piecesNagoya GrampusShimizu S-Pulse
    xG from free kicks0.070.03
    Corners per match4.14.9
    Corners against per match54.8
    xG per corner0.060.05
    xGA per corner against0.060.06
    OtherNagoya GrampusShimizu S-Pulse
    Throw-in control0.690.68
    The goalkeepersYohei Takeda (Nagoya Grampus)Yuya Oki (Shimizu S-Pulse)
    Saves4167
    Save %60%67%
    xG prevented40%42%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Nagoya Grampus vs Shimizu S-Pulse according to our model?

    The model gives Nagoya Grampus a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Nagoya Grampus 43%, draw 27%, Shimizu S-Pulse 30%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 50% and under at 50%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 54% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.