J1 League24°0,5 mm18 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    Mito HollyhockMito HollyhockBalanced & physical
    vs
    Gamba OsakaGamba OsakaPossession control
    The model's lean: 2 · Gamba Osaka (41%)

    Mito Hollyhock – Gamba Osaka · J1 League

    1 · Mito Hollyhock 32%X 27%41% Gamba Osaka · 2

    Analysis: Mito Hollyhock – Gamba Osaka

    Anna Karlsson · · How the predictions work

    Gamba Osaka heads into this clash as the bookmakers' slight favorite with a 41% chance of victory, and it's easy to see why. Their possession-heavy style has garnered them 3 points already this season, while Mito Hollyhock is stuck on zero. However, the numbers below the surface tell a different story: Mito Hollyhock has been outpacing Gamba Osaka in expected metrics, with an xG of 1.5 per match compared to Gamba's 0.92. Despite this, Mito Hollyhock's expected goals against (xGA) is a more favorable 1.4 to Gamba’s 2.3, suggesting the home side might be more effective at both creating and stifling chances.

    Mito Hollyhock's balanced and physical approach could disrupt Gamba Osaka's preference for possession control. The expected goals model gives Mito Hollyhock a slight edge in the xPoints department, with 1.0 against Osaka's 0.6. Still, the most likely scoreline is 1-1, with a 13% chance, indicating a tight contest where both teams might find the net. While the draw is a distinct possibility, Gamba Osaka's away win is priced with value at odds of 2.58 with Pinnacle, presenting a 5% edge according to the model.

    The over/under metrics don't scream goals, with just a 44% chance for over 2.5 goals and an even 50% for both teams to score. With the model suggesting a narrow 0-1 or 1-0 result as quite likely, it's hard to imagine a goal-fest. Gamba’s structural advantage, even if only slight, gives them a solid shot at a tight away victory.

    The sharpest angle here is the value on Gamba Osaka's away win — highlighted by Pinnacle's odds of 2.58, which offer a tasty 5% edge. While a draw or a low-scoring result feels plausible, Gamba's knack for controlling the game could see them edge past Mito Hollyhock.

    Mito HollyhockMito Hollyhock
    Form L
    League ranking xG #8xGA #12xT #10xP/match #14Points #15
    Gamba OsakaGamba Osaka
    Form WDLWW
    League ranking xG #16xGA #17xT #9xP/match #17Points #3
    Key players
    • Issam JebaliLWxG 0.23 · xT 0.18
    • Ryoya YamashitaCAMxG 0.10 · xT 0.32
    • Ryo HatsuseLBxG 0.00 · xT 0.01

    Match prediction: Mito Hollyhock – Gamba Osaka

    Predicted score matrix

    Gamba Osaka →
    Mito Hollyhock →
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–09.0%
    0–111.3%
    0–27.8%
    0–33.5%
    0–4+1.6%
    1
    1–09.2%
    1–113.2%
    1–28.6%
    1–33.8%
    1–4+1.7%
    2
    2–05.3%
    2–17.1%
    2–24.7%
    2–32.1%
    2–4+1.0%
    3
    3–01.9%
    3–12.6%
    3–21.7%
    3–30.8%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–00.7%
    4+–10.9%
    4+–20.6%
    4+–30.3%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-113%
    2. 2.0-111%
    3. 3.1-09%
    4. 4.0-09%
    5. 5.1-29%
    Expected goals
    1,10–1,34
    Both teams to score
    50%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,4
    Under 2,556%
    @1.76
    Over 2,544%
    @2.07

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own →

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Gamba Osaka or draw (X2)70%
    • Under 3.5 goals77%

    Combined probability

    53%

    Fair odds

    1.87

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Gamba Osaka or draw (X2)70%
    • Under 2.5 goals56%
    • Issam Jebali to score25%

    Combined probability

    10%

    Fair odds

    9.70

    Result and goals are priced jointly from the matrix; the scorer is the model's most likely in the picked side.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score50%
    • Over 2.5 goals44%
    • Issam Jebali to score25%
    • Taishi Semba to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    2%

    Fair odds

    51.30

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals — combined with the match's most likely scorer and card candidate.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Gamba Osaka41% probability@2.67PinnacleEV+9%
    • 2 · Gamba Osaka41% probability@2.58BetsafeEV+5%
    • 2 · Gamba Osaka41% probability@2.58BetssonEV+5%
    Bookmaker1 · Mito HollyhockX2 · Gamba Osaka
    Betsafe2.683.10
    EV+ 5%
    2.58
    Betsson2.683.10
    EV+ 5%
    2.58
    Nordicbet2.683.10
    EV+ 5%
    2.58
    Pinnacle2.723.21
    EV+ 9%
    2.67

    Odds updated 13 Aug, 02:36

    Odds movement

    1-4 %
    37 %32 %

    2.82 → 2.72

    X-1 %
    32 %27 %

    3.23 → 3.21

    2+3 %
    39 %34 %

    2.58 → 2.67

    Over 2,5+1 %
    49 %44 %

    2.05 → 2.07

    Pinnacle · 4 recorded price levels · 08/08/2026 → 12/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Mito Hollyhock
    Gamba Osaka
    When goals are scored and conceded — 2026
    Mito Hollyhock (1–2)
    Gamba Osaka (4–3)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Mito Hollyhock
    Kenta Itakura: 64 passningar, xT 0.02ItakuraYasuki Kimoto: 57 passningar, xT 0.1KimotoTaishi Semba: 51 passningar, xT 0.04SembaKonosuke Nishikawa: 50 passningar, xT 0.13NishikawaSho Omori: 41 passningar, xT 0.28OmoriYu Funabashi: 29 passningar, xT 0.1FunabashiTakumi Mase: 28 passningar, xT 0.21MaseAkinari Kawazura: 22 passningar, xT 0.03KawazuraArata Watanabe: 16 passningar, xT -0.01WatanabeRei Ieizumi: 15 passningar, xT 0.02IeizumiYoshiki Torikai: 14 passningar, xT 0.13Torikai
    Gamba Osaka
    Shinnosuke Nakatani: 57 passningar, xT 0.05NakataniGinjiro Ikegaya: 50 passningar, xT 0.09IkegayaTakeru Kishimoto: 48 passningar, xT 0.06KishimotoRyo Hatsuse: 43 passningar, xT 0.01HatsuseShuto Abe: 43 passningar, xT 0.18AbeRin Mito: 35 passningar, xT 0.03MitoRyotaro Meshino: 25 passningar, xT 0.04MeshinoIssam Jebali: 25 passningar, xT 0.11JebaliRyoya Yamashita: 24 passningar, xT 0.33YamashitaRui Araki: 19 passningar, xT 0.02ArakiDeniz Hümmet: 7 passningar, xT 0Hümmet
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Mito Hollyhock
    Kenta Itakura: 64 passningar, xT 0.02ItakuraYasuki Kimoto: 57 passningar, xT 0.1KimotoTaishi Semba: 51 passningar, xT 0.04SembaKonosuke Nishikawa: 50 passningar, xT 0.13NishikawaSho Omori: 41 passningar, xT 0.28OmoriYu Funabashi: 29 passningar, xT 0.1FunabashiTakumi Mase: 28 passningar, xT 0.21MaseAkinari Kawazura: 22 passningar, xT 0.03KawazuraArata Watanabe: 16 passningar, xT -0.01WatanabeRei Ieizumi: 15 passningar, xT 0.02IeizumiYoshiki Torikai: 14 passningar, xT 0.13Torikai
    Gamba Osaka
    Shinnosuke Nakatani: 57 passningar, xT 0.05NakataniGinjiro Ikegaya: 50 passningar, xT 0.09IkegayaTakeru Kishimoto: 48 passningar, xT 0.06KishimotoRyo Hatsuse: 43 passningar, xT 0.01HatsuseShuto Abe: 43 passningar, xT 0.18AbeRin Mito: 35 passningar, xT 0.03MitoRyotaro Meshino: 25 passningar, xT 0.04MeshinoIssam Jebali: 25 passningar, xT 0.11JebaliRyoya Yamashita: 24 passningar, xT 0.33YamashitaRui Araki: 19 passningar, xT 0.02ArakiDeniz Hümmet: 7 passningar, xT 0Hümmet

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceMito HollyhockGamba Osaka
    Points03
    xPoints10.6
    xG per match1.50.92
    xGA per match1.42.3
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.120.04
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.30.37
    Playing styleMito HollyhockGamba Osaka
    Build-up efficiency0.330.3
    Field tilt0.510.55
    xT per match1.11.2
    xTA per match0.471.9
    Won balls, offensive half3022
    Pressing intensity0.230.26
    Pressing efficiency0.260.3
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.290.2
    Entries into the box per match1614
    Entries into the box against816
    Pass completion %0.810.77
    Pass completion % under pressure0.770.77
    Passes per match447379
    Passes against per match536219
    Switches of play per match36.425.5
    Long balls per match4529
    Set piecesMito HollyhockGamba Osaka
    xG from free kicks0.030.1
    Corners per match5.24.9
    Corners against per match15.9
    xG per corner0.010.01
    xGA per corner against00.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.20.2
    First touch, defensive corners %00.5
    OtherMito HollyhockGamba Osaka
    Throw-in control0.720.61
    The goalkeepersKonosuke Nishikawa (Mito Hollyhock)Ginjiro Ikegaya (Gamba Osaka)
    Saves52
    Save %71%100%
    xG prevented36%100%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Mito Hollyhock vs Gamba Osaka according to our model?

    The model gives Gamba Osaka a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Mito Hollyhock 32%, draw 27%, Gamba Osaka 41%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 13% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 44% and under at 56%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 50% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Yokohama F. MarinosYokohama F. Marinos
    3–4
    Kashima AntlersKashima Antlers
    1 25%X 30%2 45%
    The model called the outcome
    Gamba OsakaGamba Osaka
    4–3
    Urawa RedsUrawa Reds
    1 38%X 26%2 36%
    The model called the outcome
    Nagoya GrampusNagoya Grampus
    0–1
    Shimizu S-PulseShimizu S-Pulse
    1 43%X 27%2 30%
    The model missed the outcome

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.