Danish SuperligaBrøndby Stadion, Brøndby18°16 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    BrøndbyBrøndbyCounter-attacks & crosses
    10
    ViborgViborgCounter-attacks & crosses
    The model's lean: 1 · Brøndby (47%)Best value by the model: 2 · Viborg @ 3.87 (+10 %)

    BrøndbyViborg · Danish Superliga

    1 · Brøndby 47%X 25%28% Viborg · 2

    Analysis: BrøndbyViborg

    Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work

    Six encounters since 2022, and Brondby IF has only managed two wins to Viborg's three. This paints a picture of a matchup where Viborg holds a subtle but undeniable psychological edge. The expected goals tell a similar story: Brondby IF is expected to net 1.66 to Viborg's 1.43, a slim gap that suggests both teams are likely to find the net. The numbers whisper a narrative of narrow margins and potential fireworks.

    Brondby IF concedes 1.9 xGA per match, which is alarming when paired with Viborg's ability to produce 1.2 xG per match. This vulnerability in Brondby's defense hints at the likelihood of Viborg capitalizing on their chances. Yet, Brondby IF's own xG of 0.96 per match suggests they might struggle to exploit Viborg's defensive weaknesses as effectively. Both teams favor a counter-attacking style, which could lead to an open game with opportunities aplenty.

    Then there’s the betting landscape. The market has priced Viborg at 3.78 with Pinnacle, carrying an 8% value edge according to the model. Viborg's historical edge and Brondby's defensive frailties make this a tempting proposition for the shrewd punter. Although Brondby IF holds the model's edge with a 47% chance of winning, the real intrigue lies in the over 2.5 goals market, priced at 1.709. With a model probability of 60%, there's a modest 2% edge here.

    Viborg. A team that's shown resilience and poise against Brondby IF before, and yet the bookmakers have them as underdogs. Those looking for value might find the away win at 3.78 hard to resist. Given the likelihood of goals, however, the over 2.5 market at 1.709 is an appealing option that aligns with both teams' playing styles and recent trends. The most likely outcome? A 2-1 victory for Brondby IF, but the savvy betters will be watching Viborg closely.

    BrøndbyBrøndby
    Form DLWLD
    League ranking xG #8xGA #10xT #9xP/match #9Points #4
    Key players
    • Sidi Mohamed Cherif HaidaraFxG 0.37 · xT -0.07
    • Sefer EminiCMxG 0.03 · xT 0.23
    • Magnus JensenCDMxG 0.34 · xT 0.11
    ViborgViborg
    Form WDLLW
    League ranking xG #7xGA #9xT #7xP/match #5Points #3
    Key players
    • Julius MadsenLWxG 0.34 · xT 0.03
    • Adam HerdonssonFxG 0.00 · xT -0.01
    • Mikkel KupijbidaCBxG 0.00 · xT 0.00
    Final score
    10
    The model called the outcome
    Predicted probabilities: Brøndby 47% · Draw 25% · Viborg 28%

    Match prediction: BrøndbyViborg

    Predicted score matrix

    Viborg
    Brøndby
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–04.8%
    0–16.2%
    0–24.6%
    0–32.2%
    0–4+1.1%
    1
    1–07.2%
    1–111.1%
    1–27.7%
    1–33.7%
    1–4+1.8%
    2
    2–06.3%
    2–19.0%
    2–26.4%
    2–33.1%
    2–4+1.5%
    3
    3–03.5%
    3–15.0%
    3–23.6%
    3–31.7%
    3–4+0.8%
    4+
    4+–02.1%
    4+–13.0%
    4+–22.2%
    4+–31.0%
    4+–4+0.5%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.2-19%
    3. 3.1-28%
    4. 4.1-07%
    5. 5.2-26%
    Expected goals
    1,661,43
    Both teams to score
    62%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,1
    Under 2,540%
    @2.28
    Over 2,560%
    @1.67

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Brøndby to win47%
    • Over 1.5 goals82%

    Combined probability

    36%

    Fair odds

    2.81

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Brøndby to win47%
    • Over 2.5 goals60%
    • Mads Frøkjær-Jensen to score28%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score62%
    • Over 2.5 goals60%
    • Mads Frøkjær-Jensen to score28%
    • Jeppe Nørregaard Grønning to be booked25%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Viborg28% probability@3.87PinnacleEV+10%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · BrøndbyX2 · Viborg
    Pinnacle1.913.88
    EV+ 10%
    3.87

    Odds updated 2 Aug, 10:10

    Odds movement

    10 %
    52 %47 %

    1.911.91

    X+3 %
    28 %23 %

    3.753.88

    2+1 %
    27 %22 %

    3.823.87

    Over 2,5-3 %
    59 %54 %

    1.711.67

    Pinnacle · 8 recorded price levels · 27/07/2026 → 02/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    6 matches
    Brøndby 2Draw 1Viborg 3
    Goals: 88 (⌀ 2,7)

    Head-to-head based on Danish Superliga data since 2022.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Brøndby
    Viborg
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Brøndby (11)
    Viborg (10)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Brøndby
    Luis Binks: 43 passningar, xT 0.02BinksJordi Vanlerberghe: 36 passningar, xT 0.03VanlerbergheOliver Villadsen: 35 passningar, xT 0.06VilladsenBartosz Piotr Slisz: 30 passningar, xT 0.04SliszWilliam Sonne-Schmidt: 23 passningar, xT 0.01Sonne-SchmidtMarko Divkovic: 23 passningar, xT 0.14DivkovicMats Kohlert: 20 passningar, xT 0.02KohlertFilip Bundgaard: 19 passningar, xT 0.03BundgaardMax Ejdum: 17 passningar, xT 0EjdumMads Frøkjær-Jensen: 15 passningar, xT 0.21Frøkjær-JensenMarcus Younis: 9 passningar, xT 0.04Younis
    Viborg
    Lukas Emil Kirkegaard: 60 passningar, xT 0.14KirkegaardZan Zaletel: 58 passningar, xT 0.04ZaletelOliver Bundgaard: 29 passningar, xT 0.01BundgaardSrdjan Kuzmic: 28 passningar, xT 0.05KuzmicKasper Hartly Kiilerich: 26 passningar, xT 0.04KiilerichJeppe Gronning: 20 passningar, xT 0.02GronningAsker Beck: 14 passningar, xT 0BeckBilal Brahimi: 13 passningar, xT -0.03BrahimiThomas Jorgensen: 12 passningar, xT 0.01JorgensenCharly Nouck: 11 passningar, xT 0.04NouckDorian Hanza: 5 passningar, xT 0.02Hanza
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Brøndby
    Luis Binks: 43 passningar, xT 0.02BinksJordi Vanlerberghe: 36 passningar, xT 0.03VanlerbergheOliver Villadsen: 35 passningar, xT 0.06VilladsenBartosz Piotr Slisz: 30 passningar, xT 0.04SliszWilliam Sonne-Schmidt: 23 passningar, xT 0.01Sonne-SchmidtMarko Divkovic: 23 passningar, xT 0.14DivkovicMats Kohlert: 20 passningar, xT 0.02KohlertFilip Bundgaard: 19 passningar, xT 0.03BundgaardMax Ejdum: 17 passningar, xT 0EjdumMads Frøkjær-Jensen: 15 passningar, xT 0.21Frøkjær-JensenMarcus Younis: 9 passningar, xT 0.04Younis
    Viborg
    Lukas Emil Kirkegaard: 60 passningar, xT 0.14KirkegaardZan Zaletel: 58 passningar, xT 0.04ZaletelOliver Bundgaard: 29 passningar, xT 0.01BundgaardSrdjan Kuzmic: 28 passningar, xT 0.05KuzmicKasper Hartly Kiilerich: 26 passningar, xT 0.04KiilerichJeppe Gronning: 20 passningar, xT 0.02GronningAsker Beck: 14 passningar, xT 0BeckBilal Brahimi: 13 passningar, xT -0.03BrahimiThomas Jorgensen: 12 passningar, xT 0.01JorgensenCharly Nouck: 11 passningar, xT 0.04NouckDorian Hanza: 5 passningar, xT 0.02Hanza

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceBrøndbyViborg
    Points13
    xPoints0.91.5
    xG per match0.961.2
    xGA per match1.91.7
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.040.29
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.470.51
    Playing styleBrøndbyViborg
    Build-up efficiency0.310.31
    Field tilt0.430.34
    xT per match0.620.87
    xTA per match1.11.5
    Won balls, offensive half1724
    Pressing intensity0.230.24
    Pressing efficiency0.410.34
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.440.42
    Entries into the box per match157
    Entries into the box against238
    Pass completion %0.730.73
    Pass completion % under pressure0.70.63
    Passes per match293296
    Passes against per match334414
    Switches of play per match12.211.4
    Long balls per match2129
    Set piecesBrøndbyViborg
    xG from free kicks0.090
    Corners per match6.17.3
    Corners against per match10.29.3
    xG per corner0.050.02
    xGA per corner against0.050
    First touch, offensive corners %0.330.29
    First touch, defensive corners %0.60.89
    OtherBrøndbyViborg
    Throw-in control0.690.74
    The goalkeepersJordi Vanlerberghe (Brøndby)Kasper Hartly Kiilerich (Viborg)
    Saves25
    Save %100%100%
    xG prevented100%100%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Teams & more matches this round

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Brøndby vs Viborg according to our model?

    The model gives Brøndby a 47% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Brøndby 47%, draw 25%, Viborg 28%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 60% and under at 40%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 62% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.