Danish SuperligaLyngby Stadion, Kongens Lyngby19°18 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    LyngbyLyngbyPossession & high press
    vs
    MidtjyllandMidtjyllandPossession control
    The model's lean: 2 · Midtjylland (43%)Best value by the model: 1 · Lyngby @ 4.90 (+64 %)

    LyngbyMidtjylland · Danish Superliga

    1 · Lyngby 33%X 23%43% Midtjylland · 2

    Analysis: LyngbyMidtjylland

    Oscar Nilsson · · How the predictions work

    Two matches into their recent head-to-head history, Midtjylland hold a clean slate against Lyngby Boldklub. Yet, it's Lyngby’s underlying numbers that intrigue the betting brain. While Midtjylland have converted their chances to points more efficiently, Lyngby’s xG per match sits at an impressive 2.3 compared to Midtjylland’s 1.1. If chances created were the sole arbiter, Lyngby might boast a much rosier outlook.

    The expected goals model suggests a tightly contested affair, with Midtjylland slightly edging it at 1.57 to Lyngby’s 1.31. The most likely scorelines reflect this narrow margin, with a 1-1 draw topping the list at 12%, shadowed by a 1-2 win for Midtjylland at 9%. Historical patterns may tip the balance in Midtjylland’s favor, but the xPoints give Lyngby an edge, 4.9 to 3.0. Such a contrast demands attention, particularly when analyzing the potential for an upset.

    Weather conditions aren't expected to play a dramatic role here, allowing both teams to employ their preferred possession-based styles. However, the high press of Lyngby could disrupt Midtjylland’s rhythm. With a 58% chance for both teams to score and a 55% probability for over 2.5 goals, the prospect of goals is more than just a hopeful punt.

    Lyngby Boldklub fans might find solace in the odds offered for a home victory. Betfair Exchange presents an enticing value at 4.9, with the model rating Lyngby’s winning chances at 33%. This presents a 64% edge for punters willing to back an upset. Paddy Power and Betsson offer shorter odds at 4.5 and 4.0, respectively, yet still with notable value margins.

    In this clash between statistical intrigue and historical form, the sharpest angle might just be to ride the potential home shocker at lucrative odds, where the numbers suggest a gilded opportunity.

    LyngbyLyngby
    Form LWLDL
    League ranking xG #2xGA #5xT #2xP/match #2Points #11
    Key players
    • Simon Willem ColynLWxG 0.36 · xT 0.34
    • Ísak Snær ÞorvaldssonFxG 0.60 · xT 0.02
    • Gustav Leone FrauloRWxG 0.19 · xT 0.36
    MidtjyllandMidtjylland
    Form DDLWW
    League ranking xG #7xGA #1xT #5xP/match #4Points #3
    Key players
    • Valdemar ByskovLWxG 0.15 · xT 0.13
    • Friday Ubi EtimFxG 0.34 · xT 0.03
    • Mads Bech SorensenCMxG 0.02 · xT 0.09

    Match prediction: LyngbyMidtjylland

    Predicted score matrix

    Midtjylland
    Lyngby
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–05.9%
    0–18.5%
    0–26.9%
    0–33.6%
    0–4+2.0%
    1
    1–07.0%
    1–111.8%
    1–29.1%
    1–34.8%
    1–4+2.7%
    2
    2–04.8%
    2–17.6%
    2–26.0%
    2–33.1%
    2–4+1.7%
    3
    3–02.1%
    3–13.3%
    3–22.6%
    3–31.4%
    3–4+0.8%
    4+
    4+–00.9%
    4+–11.5%
    4+–21.1%
    4+–30.6%
    4+–4+0.3%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.1-29%
    3. 3.0-18%
    4. 4.2-18%
    5. 5.1-07%
    Expected goals
    1,311,57
    Both teams to score
    58%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,9
    Under 2,545%
    @2.40EV+7%
    Over 2,555%
    @1.55

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Midtjylland or draw (X2)68%
    • Over 1.5 goals79%

    Combined probability

    54%

    Fair odds

    1.85

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Midtjylland or draw (X2)68%
    • Over 2.5 goals55%
    • Friday Ubi Etim to score17%

    Combined probability

    6%

    Fair odds

    16.48

    Result and goals are priced jointly from the matrix; the scorer is the model's most likely in the picked side.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score58%
    • Over 2.5 goals55%
    • Ísak Snær Þorvaldsson to score24%
    • Casper Kaarsbo Winther to be booked22%

    Combined probability

    3%

    Fair odds

    39.87

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals — combined with the match's most likely scorer and card candidate.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · Lyngby33% probability@4.90Betfair ExchangeEV+64%
    • 1 · Lyngby33% probability@4.50Paddy PowerEV+50%
    • 1 · Lyngby33% probability@4.20BetssonEV+40%
    Bookmaker1 · LyngbyX2 · Midtjylland
    Betfair Exchange
    EV+ 64%
    4.90
    4.201.66
    Betsafe
    EV+ 39%
    4.15
    3.851.78
    Betsson
    EV+ 40%
    4.20
    3.901.80
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 40%
    4.20
    3.901.80
    Paddy Power
    EV+ 50%
    4.50
    4.001.57
    Pinnacle
    EV+ 25%
    3.75
    4.291.79

    Odds updated 13 Aug, 14:36

    Odds movement

    1+4 %
    28 %23 %

    3.593.75

    X0 %
    25 %20 %

    4.294.29

    2-2 %
    55 %50 %

    1.831.79

    Pinnacle · 3 recorded price levels · 09/08/2026 → 12/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    2 matches
    Lyngby 0Draw 0Midtjylland 2
    Goals: 13 (⌀ 2)

    Head-to-head based on Danish Superliga data since 2022.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Lyngby
    Midtjylland
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Lyngby (47)
    Midtjylland (53)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Lyngby
    Casper Kaarsbo Winther: 153 passningar, xT 0.65WintherMikkel Rosleff Fischer: 145 passningar, xT 0FischerDavíð Helgi Aronsson: 124 passningar, xT 0.24AronssonLauge Wesenberg Sandgrav: 123 passningar, xT 0.27SandgravRenzo Tytens: 93 passningar, xT 0.35TytensOskar Buur Rasmussen: 89 passningar, xT 0.21RasmussenGustav Leone Fraulo: 87 passningar, xT 0.86FrauloSimon Willem Colyn: 78 passningar, xT 0.79ColynDiego Kochen: 57 passningar, xT 0.09KochenCornelius Allen: 37 passningar, xT 0.04AllenJens Jakob Dyhr Thomasen: 33 passningar, xT 0.45Thomasen
    Midtjylland
    Mads Bech Sorensen: 133 passningar, xT 0.17SorensenRasmus Kristensen: 98 passningar, xT 0.12KristensenMartin Jedlicka: 94 passningar, xT 0.39JedlickaDario Osorio: 61 passningar, xT 0.56OsorioValdemar Byskov: 61 passningar, xT 0.16ByskovPhilip Billing: 58 passningar, xT 0.08BillingPedro Bravo: 57 passningar, xT 0BravoElias Olafsson: 45 passningar, xT 0.09OlafssonJulius Emefile: 19 passningar, xT 0EmefileDenil Castillo: 19 passningar, xT 0.05CastilloVictor Bak: 16 passningar, xT -0.01Bak
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Lyngby
    Casper Kaarsbo Winther: 153 passningar, xT 0.65WintherMikkel Rosleff Fischer: 145 passningar, xT 0FischerDavíð Helgi Aronsson: 124 passningar, xT 0.24AronssonLauge Wesenberg Sandgrav: 123 passningar, xT 0.27SandgravRenzo Tytens: 93 passningar, xT 0.35TytensOskar Buur Rasmussen: 89 passningar, xT 0.21RasmussenGustav Leone Fraulo: 87 passningar, xT 0.86FrauloSimon Willem Colyn: 78 passningar, xT 0.79ColynDiego Kochen: 57 passningar, xT 0.09KochenCornelius Allen: 37 passningar, xT 0.04AllenJens Jakob Dyhr Thomasen: 33 passningar, xT 0.45Thomasen
    Midtjylland
    Mads Bech Sorensen: 133 passningar, xT 0.17SorensenRasmus Kristensen: 98 passningar, xT 0.12KristensenMartin Jedlicka: 94 passningar, xT 0.39JedlickaDario Osorio: 61 passningar, xT 0.56OsorioValdemar Byskov: 61 passningar, xT 0.16ByskovPhilip Billing: 58 passningar, xT 0.08BillingPedro Bravo: 57 passningar, xT 0BravoElias Olafsson: 45 passningar, xT 0.09OlafssonJulius Emefile: 19 passningar, xT 0EmefileDenil Castillo: 19 passningar, xT 0.05CastilloVictor Bak: 16 passningar, xT -0.01Bak

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceLyngbyMidtjylland
    Points16
    xPoints4.93
    xG per match2.31.1
    xGA per match1.20.75
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.680.19
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.320.19
    Playing styleLyngbyMidtjylland
    Build-up efficiency0.320.31
    Field tilt0.710.69
    xT per match1.61
    xTA per match0.631.1
    Won balls, offensive half3836
    Pressing intensity0.240.21
    Pressing efficiency0.340.43
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.350.41
    Entries into the box per match2214
    Entries into the box against813
    Pass completion %0.730.72
    Pass completion % under pressure0.690.71
    Passes per match374345
    Passes against per match315216
    Switches of play per match11.633.3
    Long balls per match2442
    Set piecesLyngbyMidtjylland
    xG from free kicks0.050.05
    Corners per match65.2
    Corners against per match3.33.8
    xG per corner0.030.03
    xGA per corner against0.030.05
    First touch, offensive corners %0.50.64
    First touch, defensive corners %0.40.5
    OtherLyngbyMidtjylland
    Throw-in control0.650.79
    The goalkeepersDiego Kochen (Lyngby)Philip Billing (Midtjylland)
    Saves53
    Save %42%100%
    xG prevented19%100%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Lyngby vs Midtjylland according to our model?

    The model gives Midtjylland a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Lyngby 33%, draw 23%, Midtjylland 43%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 55% and under at 45%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 58% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.