01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Randers or draw (1X)64%
- Over 1.5 goals78%
Danish SuperligaCepheus Park, Randers20°21 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · How the predictions work
In the tight arena of the Danish Superliga, Randers and Lyngby Boldklub face off in a matchup where the numbers tell a compelling story. Randers has the edge according to the model with a 43% win probability, but it's the away side, Lyngby Boldklub, who boast a better xG profile since 2022, suggesting they might be undervalued in this clash. Despite the small head-to-head sample of just two games that ended in draws, Lyngby Boldklub's expected goals and points indicate an edge, particularly in their ability to create scoring chances quickly after winning possession.
Randers is a team defined by its balanced and physical approach, yet they will be wary of Lyngby Boldklub's prowess on the counter and proficiency in delivering dangerous crosses. While the model's most likely scoreline is a tight 1-1 draw (12%), the expected goals differential is razor thin: 1.46 for Randers against 1.40 for Lyngby Boldklub. It's a match where subtle nuances could tilt the scales, such as Randers' higher expected goals against (xGA) at 1.7, which suggests defensive vulnerabilities that the visitors could exploit.
Over the last year, Lyngby Boldklub has shown a knack for creating high-quality chances, evidenced by their superior xG per match (2.8) compared to Randers' 0.58. The expected goals within 8 seconds of winning the ball (0.85 for Lyngby against 0.08 for Randers) further underpins their threat on the break. This quality, coupled with a match probability slanting in their favour at odds of 3.26 with Pinnacle, offers a tantalising value bet for those who see through the statistical lens.
A 2-1 result either way falls within the realm of possibility, yet the lingering question is whether Randers can withstand Lyngby Boldklub's incisive counter-attacking style. With a 54% chance of over 2.5 goals and both teams likely to get on the scoresheet (58%), bettors might find an enticing proposition in favouring Lyngby Boldklub to edge a closely contested encounter. Ending on the sharpest note, the value lies with the away side, making that Pinnacle price worth a roll of the dice.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Randers | X | 2 · Lyngby |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pinnacle | 2.24 | 3.68 | EV+ 3% 3.08 |
Odds updated 8 Aug, 15:52
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards an Lyngby win since 3 August — the odds have shortened from 3.36 to 3.08 (−8%).
2.06 → 2.24
3.67 → 3.68
3.36 → 3.08
1.78 → 1.76
Pinnacle · 9 recorded price levels · 03/08/2026 → 08/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Danish Superliga data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Randers | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 1 | 1 |
| xPoints | 1.9 | 4.1 |
| xG per match | 0.58 | 2.8 |
| xGA per match | 1.7 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.08 | 0.85 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.35 | 0.27 |
| Playing style | Randers | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.32 |
| Field tilt | 0.38 | 0.7 |
| xT per match | 0.61 | 1.6 |
| xTA per match | 1.3 | 0.68 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 21 | 39 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.26 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.23 | 0.37 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.3 | 0.39 |
| Entries into the box per match | 6 | 19 |
| Entries into the box against | 22 | 7 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.71 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.75 | 0.69 |
| Passes per match | 381 | 326 |
| Passes against per match | 602 | 303 |
| Switches of play per match | 15.7 | 12.4 |
| Long balls per match | 23 | 25 |
| Set pieces | Randers | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.02 | 0.04 |
| Corners per match | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Corners against per match | 9.1 | 3.5 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.06 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.33 | 0.78 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.56 | 0.57 |
| Other | Randers | Lyngby |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.83 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Jannich Storch (Randers) | Diego Kochen (Lyngby) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 9 | 4 |
| Save % | 82% | 44% |
| xG prevented | 49% | 19% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Randers a 43% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Randers 43%, draw 24%, Lyngby 33%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 54% and under at 46%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 58% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.