Eerste Divisie20°15 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    De GraafschapDe GraafschapPossession & high press
    vs
    Jong AZJong AZPossession & high press
    The model's lean: 1 · De Graafschap (52%)Best value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 3.35 (+7 %)

    De GraafschapJong AZ · Eerste Divisie

    1 · De Graafschap 52%X 24%23% Jong AZ · 2

    Analysis: De GraafschapJong AZ

    Erik Lindberg · · How the predictions work

    Four matches. That's the total head-to-head record between De Graafschap and AZ Alkmaar U21 since 2023. A small sample size, but it tilts unambiguously in favour of De Graafschap, who have recorded three wins and a draw. More telling, though, is the expected goals (xG) data, which paints a picture of De Graafschap as the dominant side. They're generating 1.6 xG per match compared to AZ Alkmaar U21's meagre 0.57, suggesting they not only create more chances but also higher-quality ones.

    De Graafschap have a strong home record, winning 63% of their matches, which aligns with the model's 52% probability of them securing victory. Their possession and high-press style mirrors that of AZ Alkmaar U21, setting the stage for a tactical showdown, but crucially, De Graafschap are better at converting this style into tangible results. The expected goals model supports their superiority with a predicted 2.16 goals for De Graafschap against AZ Alkmaar U21's 1.34.

    With a 68% chance of over 2.5 goals, the bookies are expecting a lively affair. Yet, the real sharp angle is on the under 3.5 goals market. Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet all offer odds of 1.98 on this line. The model rates the likelihood at 54%, giving savvy punters a 6% edge. Both teams are adept at possession, but their defensive stats — De Graafschap's xGA of 0.94 versus AZ Alkmaar U21's 0.82 — indicate that they can tighten the screws effectively.

    AZ Alkmaar U21 are not to be underestimated, but the numbers lean clearly towards a home win. The most likely scoreline of 2-1 (9%) reflects this, with 1-1 (9%) as the next most probable outcome. Given all factors, a 2-1 victory for De Graafschap seems the most plausible conclusion, with the value bet falling on the under 3.5 goals at attractive odds.

    De GraafschapDe Graafschap
    Form WDWLD
    League ranking xG #10xGA #5xT #6xP/match #10Points #8
    Key players
    • Joran HardemanCBxG 0.21 · xT 0.20
    • Kaya SymonsLWBxG 0.00 · xT 0.17
    • Fedde de JongCAMxG 0.39 · xT 0.03
    Jong AZJong AZ
    Form LLLWL
    League ranking xG #19xGA #3xT #7xP/match #16Points #19
    Key players
    • Sem van DuijnFxG 0.41 · xT 0.02
    • Billy van DuijlCBxG 0.03 · xT 0.16
    • Kasper BoogaardCAMxG 0.12 · xT 0.07

    Match prediction: De GraafschapJong AZ

    Predicted score matrix

    Jong AZ
    De Graafschap
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–03.3%
    0–13.8%
    0–22.7%
    0–31.2%
    0–4+0.5%
    1
    1–06.3%
    1–19.0%
    1–25.9%
    1–32.6%
    1–4+1.2%
    2
    2–07.0%
    2–19.4%
    2–26.3%
    2–32.8%
    2–4+1.3%
    3
    3–05.1%
    3–16.8%
    3–24.6%
    3–32.0%
    3–4+0.9%
    4+
    4+–04.5%
    4+–16.1%
    4+–24.1%
    4+–31.8%
    4+–4+0.8%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.2-19%
    2. 2.1-19%
    3. 3.2-07%
    4. 4.3-17%
    5. 5.2-26%
    Expected goals
    2,161,34
    Both teams to score
    66%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,5
    Under 2,532%
    @3.35EV+7%
    Over 2,568%
    @1.32

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • De Graafschap to win52%
    • Over 1.5 goals87%

    Combined probability

    49%

    Fair odds

    2.03

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • De Graafschap to win52%
    • Over 2.5 goals68%
    • Nathan Charles Kaninda to score35%

    Combined probability

    15%

    Fair odds

    6.74

    Result and goals are priced jointly from the matrix; the scorer is the model's most likely in the picked side.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score66%
    • Over 2.5 goals68%
    • Nathan Charles Kaninda to score35%
    • Billy van Duijl to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    4%

    Fair odds

    24.44

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals — combined with the match's most likely scorer and card candidate.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.532% probability@3.35BetsafeEV+7%
    • Under 2.532% probability@3.35BetssonEV+7%
    • Under 2.532% probability@3.35NordicbetEV+7%
    Bookmaker1 · De GraafschapX2 · Jong AZ
    Betsafe1.824.053.55
    Betsson1.824.053.55
    Nordicbet1.824.053.55

    Odds updated 13 Aug, 09:36

    Odds movement

    10 %
    53 %48 %

    1.821.82

    X0 %
    26 %21 %

    4.054.05

    20 %
    28 %23 %

    3.553.55

    Over 2,50 %
    74 %69 %

    1.321.32

    Betsson · 5 recorded price levels · 12/08/2026 → 13/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    De Graafschap 3Draw 1Jong AZ 0
    Goals: 154 (⌀ 4,8)

    Head-to-head based on Eerste Divisie data since 2023.

    Key facts

    • De Graafschap win 63% of their home matches all-time (38 played).
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    De Graafschap
    Jong AZ
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    De Graafschap (11)
    Jong AZ (01)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    De Graafschap
    Joran Hardeman: 86 passningar, xT 0.2HardemanGijs Bolk: 84 passningar, xT 0.11BolkClint Leemans: 70 passningar, xT 0.47LeemansKaya Symons: 55 passningar, xT 0.12SymonsDonny Warmerdam: 51 passningar, xT 0.02WarmerdamTies Wieggers: 46 passningar, xT 0.05WieggersJason Meerstadt: 41 passningar, xT 0.22MeerstadtNart Ahmeti-Grainca: 24 passningar, xT 0.23Ahmeti-GraincaFedde de Jong: 19 passningar, xT 0.17JongDenzel Eijken: 9 passningar, xT 0EijkenJannes Luca Wieckhoff: 7 passningar, xT -0.01Wieckhoff
    Jong AZ
    Rion Ichihara: 81 passningar, xT 0.45IchiharaBilly van Duijl: 63 passningar, xT 0.28DuijlSam de Grand: 46 passningar, xT 0.04GrandJulian Oerip: 44 passningar, xT -0.03OeripJesper Zwart: 42 passningar, xT 0.07ZwartJulian Sijbrands: 37 passningar, xT 0.03SijbrandsAyoub Oufkir: 35 passningar, xT 0.1OufkirKiyani Zeggen: 33 passningar, xT 0.11ZeggenHessel de Wit: 24 passningar, xT 0.26WitFrej Elkjær Andersen: 11 passningar, xT -0.02AndersenSem van Duijn: 10 passningar, xT -0.04Duijn
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    De Graafschap
    Joran Hardeman: 86 passningar, xT 0.2HardemanGijs Bolk: 84 passningar, xT 0.11BolkClint Leemans: 70 passningar, xT 0.47LeemansKaya Symons: 55 passningar, xT 0.12SymonsDonny Warmerdam: 51 passningar, xT 0.02WarmerdamTies Wieggers: 46 passningar, xT 0.05WieggersJason Meerstadt: 41 passningar, xT 0.22MeerstadtNart Ahmeti-Grainca: 24 passningar, xT 0.23Ahmeti-GraincaFedde de Jong: 19 passningar, xT 0.17JongDenzel Eijken: 9 passningar, xT 0EijkenJannes Luca Wieckhoff: 7 passningar, xT -0.01Wieckhoff
    Jong AZ
    Rion Ichihara: 81 passningar, xT 0.45IchiharaBilly van Duijl: 63 passningar, xT 0.28DuijlSam de Grand: 46 passningar, xT 0.04GrandJulian Oerip: 44 passningar, xT -0.03OeripJesper Zwart: 42 passningar, xT 0.07ZwartJulian Sijbrands: 37 passningar, xT 0.03SijbrandsAyoub Oufkir: 35 passningar, xT 0.1OufkirKiyani Zeggen: 33 passningar, xT 0.11ZeggenHessel de Wit: 24 passningar, xT 0.26WitFrej Elkjær Andersen: 11 passningar, xT -0.02AndersenSem van Duijn: 10 passningar, xT -0.04Duijn

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceDe GraafschapJong AZ
    Points10
    xPoints1.40.9
    xG per match1.60.57
    xGA per match0.940.82
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.310
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball00.04
    Playing styleDe GraafschapJong AZ
    Build-up efficiency0.320.32
    Field tilt0.640.62
    xT per match1.41.4
    xTA per match0.880.62
    Won balls, offensive half2537
    Pressing intensity0.30.23
    Pressing efficiency0.440.43
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.390.42
    Entries into the box per match1715
    Entries into the box against126
    Pass completion %0.80.75
    Pass completion % under pressure0.740.61
    Passes per match493449
    Passes against per match231299
    Switches of play per match64.534.6
    Long balls per match5759
    Set piecesDe GraafschapJong AZ
    xG from free kicks0.180
    Corners per match2.95.1
    Corners against per match6.83
    xG per corner0.050.02
    xGA per corner against0.030.06
    First touch, offensive corners %10.6
    First touch, defensive corners %0.710.67
    OtherDe GraafschapJong AZ
    Throw-in control0.770.93
    The goalkeepersTies Wieggers (De Graafschap)Rion Ichihara (Jong AZ)
    Saves32
    Save %75%100%
    xG prevented41%100%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins De Graafschap vs Jong AZ according to our model?

    The model gives De Graafschap a 52% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: De Graafschap 52%, draw 24%, Jong AZ 23%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 2-1 at 9% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 68% and under at 32%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 66% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.