Eerste Divisie29°11 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    FC EindhovenFC EindhovenPossession control
    vs
    MVV MaastrichtMVV MaastrichtPossession control
    The model's lean: 1 · FC Eindhoven (47%)Best value by the model: Under 2,5 @ 2.62 (+21 %)

    FC EindhovenMVV Maastricht · Eerste Divisie

    1 · FC Eindhoven 47%X 27%27% MVV Maastricht · 2

    Analysis: FC EindhovenMVV Maastricht

    Oscar Nilsson · · How the predictions work

    Four encounters since 2023 give us a small head-to-head sample, yet MVV Maastricht has edged ahead with two wins to Eindhoven's one. This may suggest a slight psychological edge for the visitors, but when you delve into the expected goals (xG) data, it's evident that Eindhoven holds a structural advantage at home. An expected goals tally of 1.76 against MVV Maastricht’s 1.07 paints the picture of a match where the hosts should seize control.

    Eindhoven leans heavily into a possession-control strategy, which might keep the game tight, especially as MVV Maastricht employs a similar style. While the model’s most likely scorelines of 1-1 and 1-0 hint at a closely-fought match, Eindhoven’s defensive metrics, with an xGA of just 0.57 compared to MVV Maastricht’s 0.97, suggest that if the breakthrough comes, it's more likely to be in their favor.

    MVV Maastricht boasts a higher xG within eight seconds of winning the ball, standing at 0.35, revealing their potential for rapid transitions. However, Eindhoven’s ability to limit xGA in similar transitions to a flat zero underscores the home side's defensive robustness. This could be crucial in neutralizing MVV Maastricht’s quick breaks and maintaining control over the game’s tempo.

    With the weather conditions baked into the model’s numbers, the probability tilt favors a low-scoring affair. The over/under 2.5 goals market sees 54% leaning towards over, yet value emerges on the under 2.5 goals line at odds of 2.52 with Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet. This bet holds a 16% edge according to the model, marking it as the standout betting angle. Given the defensive strengths of both teams and Eindhoven's slight edge, a 1-0 victory for the hosts seems the most plausible outcome, making the under 2.5 goals bet a savvy play in this contest.

    FC EindhovenFC Eindhoven
    Form LLLWW
    League ranking xG #18xGA #2xT #19xP/match #5Points #6
    Key players
    • Tyrese SimonsLWxG 0.10 · xT 0.11
    • Rangelo JangaFxG 0.32 · xT -0.01
    • Sven SimonsCAMxG 0.11 · xT 0.09
    MVV MaastrichtMVV Maastricht
    Form LDDLW
    League ranking xG #12xGA #6xT #16xP/match #7Points #4
    Key players
    • Lennerd DaneelsLWxG 0.24 · xT 0.30
    • Elias Sierra-CappellettiCDMxG 0.31 · xT 0.05
    • Delano AsanteRWxG 0.15 · xT 0.02

    Match prediction: FC EindhovenMVV Maastricht

    Predicted score matrix

    MVV Maastricht
    FC Eindhoven
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–06.2%
    0–16.0%
    0–23.4%
    0–31.2%
    0–4+0.4%
    1
    1–010.1%
    1–111.4%
    1–25.9%
    1–32.1%
    1–4+0.7%
    2
    2–09.1%
    2–19.8%
    2–25.2%
    2–31.9%
    2–4+0.6%
    3
    3–05.4%
    3–15.7%
    3–23.1%
    3–31.1%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–03.5%
    4+–13.8%
    4+–22.0%
    4+–30.7%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-111%
    2. 2.1-010%
    3. 3.2-110%
    4. 4.2-09%
    5. 5.0-06%
    Expected goals
    1,761,07
    Both teams to score
    55%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,8
    Under 2,546%
    @2.62EV+21%
    Over 2,554%
    @1.46

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • FC Eindhoven to win47%
    • Over 1.5 goals78%

    Combined probability

    43%

    Fair odds

    2.32

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • FC Eindhoven to win47%
    • Over 2.5 goals54%
    • Junior Poortvliet to score13%

    Combined probability

    4%

    Fair odds

    22.96

    Result and goals are priced jointly from the matrix; the scorer is the model's most likely in the picked side.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score55%
    • Over 2.5 goals54%
    • Junior Poortvliet to score13%
    • Finn Jesper Dicke to be booked21%

    Combined probability

    1%

    Fair odds

    86.65

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals — combined with the match's most likely scorer and card candidate.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 2.546% probability@2.62BetsafeEV+21%
    • Under 2.546% probability@2.62BetssonEV+21%
    • Under 2.546% probability@2.62NordicbetEV+21%
    Bookmaker1 · FC EindhovenX2 · MVV Maastricht
    Betsafe1.82
    EV+ 3%
    3.85
    3.70
    Betsson1.82
    EV+ 3%
    3.85
    3.70
    Nordicbet1.82
    EV+ 3%
    3.85
    3.70

    Odds updated 13 Aug, 08:35

    Odds movement

    10 %
    53 %48 %

    1.821.82

    X0 %
    27 %22 %

    3.853.85

    20 %
    28 %23 %

    3.703.70

    Over 2,50 %
    66 %61 %

    1.461.46

    Betsson · 4 recorded price levels · 11/08/2026 → 13/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    FC Eindhoven 1Draw 1MVV Maastricht 2
    Goals: 76 (⌀ 3,2)

    Head-to-head based on Eerste Divisie data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    FC Eindhoven
    MVV Maastricht
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    FC Eindhoven (10)
    MVV Maastricht (21)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    FC Eindhoven
    Guus Beaumont: 43 passningar, xT 0BeaumontOwen Renfrum: 32 passningar, xT 0.03RenfrumMika de Jonge: 32 passningar, xT -0.01JongeJunior Poortvliet: 32 passningar, xT 0.05PoortvlietJort Borgmans: 27 passningar, xT 0.05BorgmansThijs Muller: 22 passningar, xT 0.03MullerTyrese Simons: 21 passningar, xT 0.03SimonsClint Essers: 21 passningar, xT 0.1EssersRens Boon: 16 passningar, xT 0.05BoonSiegert Baartmans: 12 passningar, xT -0.02BaartmansNiek Munsters: 11 passningar, xT 0.06Munsters
    MVV Maastricht
    Finn Jesper Dicke: 54 passningar, xT 0.06DickeSil van der Wegen: 51 passningar, xT -0.03WegenIlias Breugelmans: 40 passningar, xT 0.31BreugelmansStan Van Dessel: 33 passningar, xT 0.11DesselMilan Hofland: 29 passningar, xT 0.03HoflandLennerd Daneels: 27 passningar, xT 0.3DaneelsElias Sierra-Cappelletti: 27 passningar, xT -0.02Sierra-CappellettiHugo Wentges: 27 passningar, xT 0.14WentgesDelano Asante: 23 passningar, xT 0.02AsanteOlivier Dumont: 22 passningar, xT -0.01DumontToni Vinogradac: 4 passningar, xT 0.01Vinogradac
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    FC Eindhoven
    Guus Beaumont: 43 passningar, xT 0BeaumontOwen Renfrum: 32 passningar, xT 0.03RenfrumMika de Jonge: 32 passningar, xT -0.01JongeJunior Poortvliet: 32 passningar, xT 0.05PoortvlietJort Borgmans: 27 passningar, xT 0.05BorgmansThijs Muller: 22 passningar, xT 0.03MullerTyrese Simons: 21 passningar, xT 0.03SimonsClint Essers: 21 passningar, xT 0.1EssersRens Boon: 16 passningar, xT 0.05BoonSiegert Baartmans: 12 passningar, xT -0.02BaartmansNiek Munsters: 11 passningar, xT 0.06Munsters
    MVV Maastricht
    Finn Jesper Dicke: 54 passningar, xT 0.06DickeSil van der Wegen: 51 passningar, xT -0.03WegenIlias Breugelmans: 40 passningar, xT 0.31BreugelmansStan Van Dessel: 33 passningar, xT 0.11DesselMilan Hofland: 29 passningar, xT 0.03HoflandLennerd Daneels: 27 passningar, xT 0.3DaneelsElias Sierra-Cappelletti: 27 passningar, xT -0.02Sierra-CappellettiHugo Wentges: 27 passningar, xT 0.14WentgesDelano Asante: 23 passningar, xT 0.02AsanteOlivier Dumont: 22 passningar, xT -0.01DumontToni Vinogradac: 4 passningar, xT 0.01Vinogradac

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceFC EindhovenMVV Maastricht
    Points33
    xPoints1.71.7
    xG per match0.821.4
    xGA per match0.570.97
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.040.35
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball00.15
    Playing styleFC EindhovenMVV Maastricht
    Build-up efficiency0.310.3
    Field tilt0.380.62
    xT per match0.620.95
    xTA per match1.41.2
    Won balls, offensive half2827
    Pressing intensity0.220.23
    Pressing efficiency0.390.36
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.390.33
    Entries into the box per match611
    Entries into the box against1516
    Pass completion %0.690.72
    Pass completion % under pressure0.570.62
    Passes per match299333
    Passes against per match449228
    Switches of play per match14.233.2
    Long balls per match3751
    Set piecesFC EindhovenMVV Maastricht
    xG from free kicks0.020
    Corners per match32.9
    Corners against per match5.14.9
    xG per corner0.060.02
    xGA per corner against0.020.09
    First touch, offensive corners %0.330.33
    First touch, defensive corners %0.40
    OtherFC EindhovenMVV Maastricht
    Throw-in control0.780.62
    The goalkeepersJort Borgmans (FC Eindhoven)Hugo Wentges (MVV Maastricht)
    Saves52
    Save %100%67%
    xG prevented100%77%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins FC Eindhoven vs MVV Maastricht according to our model?

    The model gives FC Eindhoven a 47% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: FC Eindhoven 47%, draw 27%, MVV Maastricht 27%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 54% and under at 46%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.