Eerste Divisie15°16,6 mm13 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    EmmenEmmenPossession control
    vs
    Jong AZJong AZPossession & high press
    The model's lean: 1 · Emmen (45%)

    EmmenJong AZ · Eerste Divisie

    1 · Emmen 45%X 25%30% Jong AZ · 2

    Analysis: EmmenJong AZ

    Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work

    Four head-to-heads since 2023 offer a small sample size, but Emmen's home form this season has pointed them in the right direction against AZ Alkmaar U21. The model's lean towards Emmen, with a 45% probability of victory, is mirrored by their slight advantage in expected goals (1.88 to 1.42) and a possession control style that can exploit AZ Alkmaar U21's high press—especially under wet conditions. The forecast of 6.0 mm of rain could suppress some goal-scoring opportunities, yet the overall model prediction still gives a healthy 64% chance of over 2.5 goals.

    Emmen has shown a knack for leveraging home advantage, as evidenced by their edge in xG per match (1.1 compared to AZ Alkmaar U21's 0.57). Emmen's defensive vulnerabilities are clear, conceding an xGA of 1.7, but AZ Alkmaar U21's own struggles in creating high-quality chances (0.57 xG per match) suggest they might find it challenging to capitalize. The most likely scorelines reflect a tight contest, with a 10% probability for a 1-1 draw and a 9% chance of a 2-1 win for Emmen.

    AZ Alkmaar U21, despite their high press style, has yet to notch a point this season, making their 30% chance of winning seem optimistic. Their defensive metrics, with an xGA of 0.82, suggest they'll aim to stifle Emmen's attack. However, with Emmen's ability to control possession and the pressing style potentially backfiring in rainy conditions, AZ Alkmaar U21 might struggle to keep the home side at bay.

    The sharpest angle lies in the over 2.5 goals market, given the 64% probability and the scoring tendencies of both teams. While the weather might play a dampening role, the match's dynamics lean towards goals, making this an enticing prospect for those looking to place a wager.

    EmmenEmmen
    Form WLDWW
    League ranking xG #15xGA #16xT #13xP/match #13Points #8
    Key players
    • Romano PostemaFxG 0.52 · xT 0.08
    • Pascal MulderCBxG 0.20 · xT 0.14
    • Freddy QuispelFxG 0.24 · xT 0.06
    Jong AZJong AZ
    Form LLLWL
    League ranking xG #21xGA #3xT #7xP/match #19Points #20
    Key players
    • Sem van DuijnFxG 0.41 · xT 0.02
    • Billy van DuijlCBxG 0.03 · xT 0.16
    • Kasper BoogaardCAMxG 0.12 · xT 0.07

    Match prediction: EmmenJong AZ

    Predicted score matrix

    Jong AZ
    Emmen
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–04.0%
    0–14.9%
    0–23.7%
    0–31.8%
    0–4+0.9%
    1
    1–06.6%
    1–110.1%
    1–27.0%
    1–33.3%
    1–4+1.6%
    2
    2–06.5%
    2–19.2%
    2–26.6%
    2–33.1%
    2–4+1.5%
    3
    3–04.1%
    3–15.8%
    3–24.1%
    3–32.0%
    3–4+1.0%
    4+
    4+–02.9%
    4+–14.2%
    4+–23.0%
    4+–31.4%
    4+–4+0.7%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-110%
    2. 2.2-19%
    3. 3.1-27%
    4. 4.1-07%
    5. 5.2-27%
    Expected goals
    1,881,42
    Both teams to score
    65%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 3,3
    Under 2,536%
    @2.68
    Over 2,564%
    @1.44

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Emmen to win45%
    • Over 1.5 goals84%

    Combined probability

    41%

    Fair odds

    2.43

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Emmen to win45%
    • Over 2.5 goals64%
    • Freddy Quispel to score23%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score65%
    • Over 2.5 goals64%
    • Freddy Quispel to score23%
    • Billy van Duijl to be booked20%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 1 · Emmen45% probability@2.32BetsafeEV+5%reference odds
    • 1 · Emmen45% probability@2.32BetssonEV+5%reference odds
    • 1 · Emmen45% probability@2.32NordicbetEV+5%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · EmmenX2 · Jong AZ
    Betsafe
    EV+ 5%
    2.32
    3.602.65
    Betsson
    EV+ 5%
    2.32
    3.602.65
    Nordicbet
    EV+ 5%
    2.32
    3.602.65

    Odds updated 18 Aug, 11:36

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards an Jong AZ win since 17 August — the odds have shortened from 2.90 to 2.65 (−9%).

    1+8 %
    44 %39 %

    2.152.32

    X0 %
    28 %23 %

    3.603.60

    2-9 %
    35 %30 %

    2.902.65

    Over 2,5-1 %
    66 %61 %

    1.461.44

    Betsson · 5 recorded price levels · 17/08/2026 → 18/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Head-to-head

    4 matches
    Emmen 2Draw 1Jong AZ 1
    Goals: 99 (⌀ 4,5)

    Head-to-head based on Eerste Divisie data since 2023.

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Emmen
    Jong AZ
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Emmen (10)
    Jong AZ (01)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Emmen
    Yanis Dede-Lhomme: 48 passningar, xT 0.14Dede-LhommeJoshua Mukeh: 39 passningar, xT 0.02MukehLuca Everink: 29 passningar, xT 0.02EverinkCasper Staring: 26 passningar, xT 0.14StaringJack Cooper-Love: 18 passningar, xT 0.06Cooper-LoveBryan Albert Van Hove: 18 passningar, xT 0.05HoveMichael John Breij: 18 passningar, xT 0.18BreijSam Karssies: 17 passningar, xT 0KarssiesVincent Carus: 17 passningar, xT 0.24CarusFreddy Quispel: 15 passningar, xT 0.01QuispelNelson Efosa Amadin: 13 passningar, xT 0.05Amadin
    Jong AZ
    Rion Ichihara: 81 passningar, xT 0.45IchiharaBilly van Duijl: 63 passningar, xT 0.28DuijlSam de Grand: 46 passningar, xT 0.04GrandJulian Oerip: 44 passningar, xT -0.03OeripJesper Zwart: 42 passningar, xT 0.07ZwartJulian Sijbrands: 37 passningar, xT 0.03SijbrandsAyoub Oufkir: 35 passningar, xT 0.1OufkirKiyani Zeggen: 33 passningar, xT 0.11ZeggenHessel de Wit: 24 passningar, xT 0.26WitFrej Elkjær Andersen: 11 passningar, xT -0.02AndersenSem van Duijn: 10 passningar, xT -0.04Duijn
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Emmen
    Yanis Dede-Lhomme: 48 passningar, xT 0.14Dede-LhommeJoshua Mukeh: 39 passningar, xT 0.02MukehLuca Everink: 29 passningar, xT 0.02EverinkCasper Staring: 26 passningar, xT 0.14StaringJack Cooper-Love: 18 passningar, xT 0.06Cooper-LoveBryan Albert Van Hove: 18 passningar, xT 0.05HoveMichael John Breij: 18 passningar, xT 0.18BreijSam Karssies: 17 passningar, xT 0KarssiesVincent Carus: 17 passningar, xT 0.24CarusFreddy Quispel: 15 passningar, xT 0.01QuispelNelson Efosa Amadin: 13 passningar, xT 0.05Amadin
    Jong AZ
    Rion Ichihara: 81 passningar, xT 0.45IchiharaBilly van Duijl: 63 passningar, xT 0.28DuijlSam de Grand: 46 passningar, xT 0.04GrandJulian Oerip: 44 passningar, xT -0.03OeripJesper Zwart: 42 passningar, xT 0.07ZwartJulian Sijbrands: 37 passningar, xT 0.03SijbrandsAyoub Oufkir: 35 passningar, xT 0.1OufkirKiyani Zeggen: 33 passningar, xT 0.11ZeggenHessel de Wit: 24 passningar, xT 0.26WitFrej Elkjær Andersen: 11 passningar, xT -0.02AndersenSem van Duijn: 10 passningar, xT -0.04Duijn

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceEmmenJong AZ
    Points30
    xPoints1.10.9
    xG per match1.10.57
    xGA per match1.70.82
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.320
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.070.04
    Playing styleEmmenJong AZ
    Build-up efficiency0.340.32
    Field tilt0.560.62
    xT per match1.21.4
    xTA per match0.980.62
    Won balls, offensive half2737
    Pressing intensity0.210.23
    Pressing efficiency0.320.43
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.350.42
    Entries into the box per match1415
    Entries into the box against106
    Pass completion %0.720.75
    Pass completion % under pressure0.720.61
    Passes per match288450
    Passes against per match376300
    Switches of play per match17.434.7
    Long balls per match2059
    Set piecesEmmenJong AZ
    xG from free kicks00
    Corners per match05.1
    Corners against per match23.1
    xG per corner00.02
    xGA per corner against0.020.06
    First touch, offensive corners %00.6
    First touch, defensive corners %10.67
    OtherEmmenJong AZ
    Throw-in control0.780.93
    The goalkeepersSam Karssies (Emmen)Rion Ichihara (Jong AZ)
    Saves32
    Save %100%100%
    xG prevented100%100%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Emmen vs Jong AZ according to our model?

    The model gives Emmen a 45% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Emmen 45%, draw 25%, Jong AZ 30%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 10% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 64% and under at 36%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 65% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.