EFL ChampionshipMolineux, Wolverhampton17°5,7 mm17 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    WolverhamptonWolverhamptonPossession control
    vs
    Stoke CityStoke CityLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 1 · Wolverhampton (51%)Best value by the model: 2 · Stoke City @ 6.18 (+41 %)

    WolverhamptonStoke City · EFL Championship

    1 · Wolverhampton 51%X 26%23% Stoke City · 2

    Analysis: WolverhamptonStoke City

    Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work

    TEXT (corrected):

    Six straight losses cast a long shadow over Stoke City's visit to Wolverhampton, and that streak tells a stark story about the visitors' current plight. Such a sequence is a clear reflection of their struggles, both in form and underlying metrics. When we shift focus to the limited head-to-head sample from this season, it holds less sway than the obvious narrative of Stoke's downward spiral.

    Wolverhampton, meanwhile, not only have the form edge but also control the narrative on both ends of the pitch. They average 1.9 expected goals per match while conceding only 0.74, compared to Stoke's meager 0.71 xG and porous 1.6 xGA. The numbers suggest a defensive solidity from the hosts, contrasting sharply with Stoke’s leaky backline. The most probable results, 1-1 and 1-0, underscore the likelihood of a low-scoring affair with Wolverhampton having the upper hand.

    The playing styles add another layer to the analysis. Wolverhampton's possession-based approach should dominate against Stoke's low block and direct counterattacks. The visitors will likely struggle to make their direct play count against a well-organized Wolves side, particularly given their offensive inefficiency. The model gives Wolverhampton a 51% chance to win, aligning with the expectation of them asserting control.

    Given Stoke's dismal run and the host's defensive stability, a narrow scoreline such as 1-1 or 1-0 for Wolverhampton appears the most plausible outcome. With over 2.5 goals sitting at just 46%, this match could easily fall under, reinforcing a lean towards a narrow win for the hosts.

    WolverhamptonWolverhampton
    Form DW
    League ranking xG #4xGA #2xT #9xP/match #2Points #4
    Key players
    • Fer LópezRWxG 0.27 · xT 0.08
    • Raúl Alonso Jiménez RodríguezFxG 0.94 · xT 0.15
    • Marshall MunetsiLWxG 0.24 · xT -0.02
    Stoke CityStoke City
    Form LLLLL
    League ranking xG #23xGA #14xT #8xP/match #23Points #22
    Key players
    • Sam GallagherFxG 0.02 · xT 0.09
    • Jun Ho BaeRWxG 0.11 · xT 0.11
    • Ethan Stuart William GalbraithFxG 0.07 · xT 0.01

    Match prediction: WolverhamptonStoke City

    Predicted score matrix

    Stoke City
    Wolverhampton
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–08.3%
    0–17.2%
    0–23.6%
    0–31.1%
    0–4+0.3%
    1
    1–012.2%
    1–112.3%
    1–25.7%
    1–31.8%
    1–4+0.5%
    2
    2–010.0%
    2–19.5%
    2–24.5%
    2–31.4%
    2–4+0.4%
    3
    3–05.3%
    3–15.0%
    3–22.4%
    3–30.8%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–03.0%
    4+–12.8%
    4+–21.3%
    4+–30.4%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.1-012%
    3. 3.2-010%
    4. 4.2-19%
    5. 5.0-08%
    Expected goals
    1,580,95
    Both teams to score
    49%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,5
    Under 2,554%
    @2.10EV+12%
    Over 2,546%
    @1.74

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Wolverhampton to win51%
    • Under 3.5 goals75%

    Combined probability

    37%

    Fair odds

    2.71

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Wolverhampton to win51%
    • Under 2.5 goals54%
    • Marshall Nyasha Munetsi to score35%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score49%
    • Over 2.5 goals46%
    • Marshall Nyasha Munetsi to score35%
    • Steven N'Kemboanza Mike Christopher Nzonzi to be booked24%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • 2 · Stoke City23% probability@6.18PinnacleEV+41%reference odds
    • X · Draw26% probability@4.40PinnacleEV+15%reference odds
    • Under 2.554% probability@2.10PinnacleEV+12%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · WolverhamptonX2 · Stoke City
    Pinnacle1.49
    EV+ 15%
    4.40
    EV+ 41%
    6.18

    Odds updated 26 Aug, 05:17

    Odds movement

    1+1 %
    67 %62 %

    1.471.49

    X-2 %
    23 %18 %

    4.514.40

    2-2 %
    17 %12 %

    6.326.18

    Over 2,5+1 %
    58 %53 %

    1.721.74

    Pinnacle · 5 recorded price levels · 23/08/2026 → 26/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Key facts

    • Stoke City have lost 6 in a row.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Wolverhampton
    Stoke City
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Wolverhampton (53)
    Stoke City (25)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Wolverhampton
    Toti Gomes: 141 passningar, xT 0.17GomesFer López: 82 passningar, xT 0.16LópezYerson Mosquera: 79 passningar, xT 0.04MosqueraAndré: 66 passningar, xT 0.04AndréNasser Djiga: 54 passningar, xT 0.04DjigaHugo Bueno: 53 passningar, xT 0.06BuenoKieran John Trippier: 53 passningar, xT 0.34TrippierJosé Sá: 44 passningar, xT 0.01David Møller Wolfe: 42 passningar, xT 0.32WolfeJackson Tchatchoua: 41 passningar, xT 0.24TchatchouaMateus Mané: 31 passningar, xT 0.33Mané
    Stoke City
    Eric Junior Bocat: 57 passningar, xT 0.06BocatBen Wilmot: 55 passningar, xT 0.03WilmotViktor Johansson: 47 passningar, xT 0.07JohanssonBenjamin James Gibson: 44 passningar, xT 0.04GibsonEthan Stuart William Galbraith: 43 passningar, xT 0.03GalbraithBenjamin Sorba William Thomas: 38 passningar, xT 0.9ThomasEl Hadji Djibril Soumaré: 32 passningar, xT 0.14SoumaréLuke Graham: 30 passningar, xT -0.01GrahamMaksym Taloverov: 27 passningar, xT 0.08TaloverovJun Ho Bae: 25 passningar, xT 0.11BaeBenjamin Anthony Johnson: 23 passningar, xT 0.05Johnson
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Wolverhampton
    Toti Gomes: 141 passningar, xT 0.17GomesFer López: 82 passningar, xT 0.16LópezYerson Mosquera: 79 passningar, xT 0.04MosqueraAndré: 66 passningar, xT 0.04AndréNasser Djiga: 54 passningar, xT 0.04DjigaHugo Bueno: 53 passningar, xT 0.06BuenoKieran John Trippier: 53 passningar, xT 0.34TrippierJosé Sá: 44 passningar, xT 0.01David Møller Wolfe: 42 passningar, xT 0.32WolfeJackson Tchatchoua: 41 passningar, xT 0.24TchatchouaMateus Mané: 31 passningar, xT 0.33Mané
    Stoke City
    Eric Junior Bocat: 57 passningar, xT 0.06BocatBen Wilmot: 55 passningar, xT 0.03WilmotViktor Johansson: 47 passningar, xT 0.07JohanssonBenjamin James Gibson: 44 passningar, xT 0.04GibsonEthan Stuart William Galbraith: 43 passningar, xT 0.03GalbraithBenjamin Sorba William Thomas: 38 passningar, xT 0.9ThomasEl Hadji Djibril Soumaré: 32 passningar, xT 0.14SoumaréLuke Graham: 30 passningar, xT -0.01GrahamMaksym Taloverov: 27 passningar, xT 0.08TaloverovJun Ho Bae: 25 passningar, xT 0.11BaeBenjamin Anthony Johnson: 23 passningar, xT 0.05Johnson

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceWolverhamptonStoke City
    Points40
    xPoints4.31.7
    xG per match1.90.71
    xGA per match0.741.6
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.120.07
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.040.08
    Playing styleWolverhamptonStoke City
    Build-up efficiency0.290.29
    Field tilt0.560.3
    xT per match1.21.2
    xTA per match0.480.79
    Won balls, offensive half1925
    Pressing intensity0.210.24
    Pressing efficiency0.270.29
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.250.27
    Entries into the box per match1413
    Entries into the box against1113
    Pass completion %0.790.68
    Pass completion % under pressure0.70.65
    Passes per match428237
    Passes against per match324374
    Switches of play per match25.719
    Long balls per match2629
    Set piecesWolverhamptonStoke City
    xG from free kicks0.010.2
    Corners per match4.53
    Corners against per match54.5
    xG per corner0.010
    xGA per corner against0.030.03
    First touch, offensive corners %0.330
    First touch, defensive corners %0.60.56
    OtherWolverhamptonStoke City
    Throw-in control0.80.79
    The goalkeepersMarshall Munetsi (Wolverhampton)Viktor Johansson (Stoke City)
    Saves63
    Save %100%38%
    xG prevented100%10%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Wolverhampton vs Stoke City according to our model?

    The model gives Wolverhampton a 51% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Wolverhampton 51%, draw 26%, Stoke City 23%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 46% and under at 54%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 49% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.