EFL ChampionshipRacecourse Ground, Wrexham14°3,5 mm27 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    WrexhamWrexhamPossession control
    vs
    BurnleyBurnleyBalanced & physical
    The model's lean: 1 · Wrexham (45%)Best value by the model: X · Draw @ 3.63 (+1 %)

    WrexhamBurnley · EFL Championship

    1 · Wrexham 45%X 28%27% Burnley · 2

    Analysis: WrexhamBurnley

    Sofia Andersson · · The model's read on the match · How the predictions work

    TEXT: Wrexham's edge in both points and expected goals paints a compelling picture ahead of their clash with Burnley. The numbers suggest a home advantage: Wrexham has a 45% chance of victory, noticeably stronger than Burnley's 27%. The model's lean toward the hosts aligns with their superior form in both actual and expected metrics. Their consistent scoring streak across eight matches reinforces this narrative, making them a formidable opponent at home.

    Burnley, however, isn't to be dismissed lightly. Despite their lower points tally, they've demonstrated resilience by finding the net in nine consecutive matches. This scoring consistency ensures they pose a threat, even as they face a Wrexham side known for controlling possession. The expected goals (xG) tally—1.52 for the hosts versus Burnley's 1.21—indicates a slight offensive edge for Wrexham, although both are likely to have chances.

    Weather conditions, with light rain anticipated, could play a role in dampening the attacking flair of both teams. Yet, the expected goals and both teams to score metrics remain relatively high. The forecasted 51% chance of over 2.5 goals suggests a cautious lean toward a moderately open game, despite the wet conditions.

    In this tightly poised matchup, the most probable scorelines of 1-1 and 1-0 suggest a narrow Wrexham victory or a draw. The 12% probability of a 1-1 draw and Wrexham's 10% chance for a 1-0 win further underscore the likelihood of a close contest. For those seeking value in this fixture, the 1-1 draw stands out as an enticing prospect, considering the high chance of both teams finding the back of the net.

    As Wrexham aims to capitalize on their better defensive record, look for them to edge this encounter with a slim 1-0 victory, keeping it under 2.5 goals—a potentially profitable narrative where the numbers align intriguingly.

    WrexhamWrexham
    Form DDDLW
    League ranking xG #13xGA #1xT #6xP/match #5Points #15
    Key players
    • Kieffer MooreFxG 0.27 · xT 0.06
    • Benjamin WhitemanCMxG 0.04 · xT 0.03
    • Matthew Lee JamesCDMxG 0.03 · xT 0.04
    BurnleyBurnley
    Form WDLLD
    League ranking xG #16xGA #23xT #10xP/match #19Points #23
    Key players
    • Zian FlemmingFxG 0.93 · xT 0.04
    • Marcus EdwardsRWxG 0.00 · xT 0.28
    • Jacob Bruun LarsenLWxG 0.06 · xT 0.20

    Match prediction: WrexhamBurnley

    Predicted score matrix

    Burnley
    Wrexham
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–06.8%
    0–17.5%
    0–24.8%
    0–31.9%
    0–4+0.8%
    1
    1–09.5%
    1–112.3%
    1–27.3%
    1–32.9%
    1–4+1.2%
    2
    2–07.5%
    2–19.1%
    2–25.5%
    2–32.2%
    2–4+0.9%
    3
    3–03.8%
    3–14.6%
    3–22.8%
    3–31.1%
    3–4+0.4%
    4+
    4+–02.0%
    4+–12.5%
    4+–21.5%
    4+–30.6%
    4+–4+0.2%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-112%
    2. 2.1-010%
    3. 3.2-19%
    4. 4.2-08%
    5. 5.0-18%
    Expected goals
    1,521,21
    Both teams to score
    55%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,7
    Under 2,549%
    @2.02
    Over 2,551%
    @1.82

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Wrexham or draw (1X)70%
    • Over 1.5 goals76%

    Combined probability

    54%

    Fair odds

    1.86

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Wrexham or draw (1X)70%
    • Over 2.5 goals51%
    • Joshua Dean Windass to score30%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score55%
    • Over 2.5 goals51%
    • Joshua Dean Windass to score30%
    • Benjamin David Sheaf to be booked20%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • X · Draw28% probability@3.63PinnacleEV+1%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · WrexhamX2 · Burnley
    Betsafe2.083.453.45
    Betsson2.083.453.45
    Nordicbet2.083.453.45
    Pinnacle2.04
    EV+ 1%
    3.63
    3.45

    Odds updated 7 Sept, 05:35

    Odds movement

    1+6 %
    50 %45 %

    1.932.04

    X-3 %
    28 %23 %

    3.763.63

    2-7 %
    29 %24 %

    3.703.45

    Over 2,5+2 %
    56 %51 %

    1.761.80

    Pinnacle · 2 recorded price levels · 06/09/2026 → 07/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points

    Statistics

    Key facts

    • Wrexham have scored in 8 consecutive league matches.
    • Burnley have scored in 9 consecutive league matches.
    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Wrexham
    Burnley
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Wrexham (64)
    Burnley (510)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Wrexham
    Callum Doyle: 186 passningar, xT 0.42DoyleLewis Obrien: 183 passningar, xT 0.32ObrienBenjamin Whiteman: 163 passningar, xT 0.1WhitemanDominic Hyam: 159 passningar, xT 0.14HyamZak Vyner: 128 passningar, xT 0.66VynerMatthew Lee James: 96 passningar, xT 0.08JamesAnthony Patterson: 88 passningar, xT 0.27PattersonOliver Michael Rathbone: 71 passningar, xT 0.3RathboneGeorge Andrew Thomason: 62 passningar, xT 0.17ThomasonMax George Cleworth: 61 passningar, xT 0.06CleworthNathan Paul Broadhead: 53 passningar, xT 0.29Broadhead
    Burnley
    Max Alleyne: 231 passningar, xT 0.25AlleyneKyle Walker: 176 passningar, xT 0.57WalkerAnel Ahmedhodžić: 122 passningar, xT 0.06AhmedhodžićMax Weiß: 120 passningar, xT 0.04WeißConnor Roberts: 114 passningar, xT 0.1RobertsJosh Laurent: 92 passningar, xT -0.04LaurentHannibal Mejbri: 86 passningar, xT 0.17MejbriJacob Bruun Larsen: 85 passningar, xT 0.6LarsenBashir Humphreys: 77 passningar, xT 0.08HumphreysOliver Sonne: 70 passningar, xT 0.04SonneAaron James Ramsey: 67 passningar, xT 0.02Ramsey
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Wrexham
    Callum Doyle: 186 passningar, xT 0.42DoyleLewis Obrien: 183 passningar, xT 0.32ObrienBenjamin Whiteman: 163 passningar, xT 0.1WhitemanDominic Hyam: 159 passningar, xT 0.14HyamZak Vyner: 128 passningar, xT 0.66VynerMatthew Lee James: 96 passningar, xT 0.08JamesAnthony Patterson: 88 passningar, xT 0.27PattersonOliver Michael Rathbone: 71 passningar, xT 0.3RathboneGeorge Andrew Thomason: 62 passningar, xT 0.17ThomasonMax George Cleworth: 61 passningar, xT 0.06CleworthNathan Paul Broadhead: 53 passningar, xT 0.29Broadhead
    Burnley
    Max Alleyne: 231 passningar, xT 0.25AlleyneKyle Walker: 176 passningar, xT 0.57WalkerAnel Ahmedhodžić: 122 passningar, xT 0.06AhmedhodžićMax Weiß: 120 passningar, xT 0.04WeißConnor Roberts: 114 passningar, xT 0.1RobertsJosh Laurent: 92 passningar, xT -0.04LaurentHannibal Mejbri: 86 passningar, xT 0.17MejbriJacob Bruun Larsen: 85 passningar, xT 0.6LarsenBashir Humphreys: 77 passningar, xT 0.08HumphreysOliver Sonne: 70 passningar, xT 0.04SonneAaron James Ramsey: 67 passningar, xT 0.02Ramsey

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceWrexhamBurnley
    Points52
    xPoints6.84.4
    xG per match1.31.2
    xGA per match0.841.7
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.080.08
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.080.41
    Playing styleWrexhamBurnley
    Build-up efficiency0.330.3
    Field tilt0.520.43
    xT per match1.10.99
    xTA per match0.830.98
    Won balls, offensive half3015
    Pressing intensity0.240.24
    Pressing efficiency0.340.23
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.340.2
    Entries into the box per match1210
    Entries into the box against1013
    Pass completion %0.750.78
    Pass completion % under pressure0.730.73
    Passes per match366387
    Passes against per match299405
    Switches of play per match21.834.5
    Long balls per match3431
    Set piecesWrexhamBurnley
    xG from free kicks0.040.01
    Corners per match5.95
    Corners against per match4.73.3
    xG per corner0.020.03
    xGA per corner against0.060.07
    First touch, offensive corners %0.290.3
    First touch, defensive corners %0.670.54
    OtherWrexhamBurnley
    Throw-in control0.740.74
    The goalkeepersAnthony Patterson (Wrexham)Max Weiß (Burnley)
    Saves87
    Save %67%41%
    xG prevented35%23%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Wrexham vs Burnley according to our model?

    The model gives Wrexham a 45% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Wrexham 45%, draw 28%, Burnley 27%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 51% and under at 49%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 55% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.