EFL League OneHayes Lane, Bromley16°11 km/h

    Läs på svenska
    BromleyBromleyLow block & direct
    vs
    Cambridge UnitedCambridge UnitedLow block & direct
    The model's lean: 2 · Cambridge United (37%)Soft drawBest value by the model: Under 0,5 @ 10.00 (+10 %)
    Limited dataThe model has thin or uncertain data for this match — the forecast may be unreliable and the match is excluded from our value lists.

    BromleyCambridge United · EFL League One

    1 · Bromley 35%X 28%37% Cambridge United · 2

    Analysis: BromleyCambridge United

    Oscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work

    The clash between Bromley FC and Cambridge United is an intriguing puzzle of numbers and styles. Cambridge holds a slight edge with a 37% chance of victory compared to Bromley's 35%, suggesting a tight contest. The model’s probabilities highlight a potential draw at 28%, with the most likely scoreline being a 1-1 draw at 14%. The expected goals lean just in Bromley's favour at 1.19 versus Cambridge's 1.06. But don't let that fool you — Cambridge has been the more prolific team in terms of raw xG per match, boasting a robust 2.4 compared to Bromley's 0.99.

    Bromley FC, known for their low defensive blocks and direct approach, has an advantage in speedy counter-attacks, generating 0.43 xG within eight seconds of winning the ball. Cambridge, despite their defensive frailties, matches this directness with an almost identical tactical setup but has struggled to convert quick turnovers into tangible threats, managing only 0.07 xG.

    The rain expected during the match could be a dampener on the spectacle and scoring, further underscored by the model's 39% probability for over 2.5 goals and 46% for both teams to score. With such conditions, the match may lean towards a lower scoreline, perhaps even a 1-0 edge to either side.

    Cambridge United's superior xPoints of 2.2 suggest they should edge this one, especially given their higher scoring potential when not constrained by conditions. However, the real betting value emerges with the under 0.5 goals market, provided by Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet, all offering odds of 10.0. The model rates this scenario at 11%, offering a 10% edge and tantalising value for the risk-inclined.

    BromleyBromley
    Form W
    League ranking xG #18xGA #13xT #21xP/match #10Points #8
    Key players
    • Mitchell Bernard PinnockLWxG 0.16 · xT 0.28
    • Kamil Amadu ContehFxG 0.01 · xT 0.01
    • William Mbongo Desire HondermarckLWxG 0.00 · xT 0.04
    Cambridge UnitedCambridge United
    Form WLLLW
    League ranking xG #1xGA #22xT #18xP/match #3Points #5

    Match prediction: BromleyCambridge United

    Predicted score matrix

    Cambridge United
    Bromley
    0
    1
    2
    3
    4+
    0
    0–011.0%
    0–110.8%
    0–26.0%
    0–32.1%
    0–4+0.7%
    1
    1–012.1%
    1–113.7%
    1–27.1%
    1–32.5%
    1–4+0.8%
    2
    2–07.4%
    2–17.9%
    2–24.2%
    2–31.5%
    2–4+0.5%
    3
    3–02.9%
    3–13.1%
    3–21.7%
    3–30.6%
    3–4+0.2%
    4+
    4+–01.1%
    4+–11.2%
    4+–20.6%
    4+–30.2%
    4+–4+0.1%
    Probability per final score. Rows = home goals, columns = away goals.

    Most likely scorelines

    1. 1.1-114%
    2. 2.1-012%
    3. 3.0-011%
    4. 4.0-111%
    5. 5.2-18%
    Expected goals
    1,191,06
    Both teams to score
    46%

    Over/under goals

    Expected goals: 2,2
    Under 2,561%
    @1.72EV+5%
    Over 2,539%
    @2.02

    Ready-made bet suggestions

    More combos & build your own

    01 · 2 legs

    Safe

    • Double chance Cambridge United or draw (X2)62%
    • Under 3.5 goals81%

    Combined probability

    51%

    Fair odds

    1.98

    Two legs pulling the same way — the probability is computed exactly from the score matrix, not multiplied.

    02 · 3 legs

    Balanced

    • Double chance Cambridge United or draw (X2)62%
    • Under 2.5 goals61%
    • Benjamin Leo Knight to score20%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The whole slip is priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches — the scorer interacts with result and total goals, never naive multiplication.

    03 · 4 legs

    Bold

    • Both teams to score46%
    • Over 2.5 goals39%
    • William Mbongo Desire Hondermarck to score24%
    • Zak Dominic Bradshaw to be booked22%

    Combined probability

    Fair odds

    The goal-fest: both teams score with at least three goals, plus the match's most likely scorer and card candidate — all priced jointly via 20,000 simulated matches.

    Odds & value

    The model's value spots

    Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).

    • Under 0.511% probability@10.00BetsafeEV+10%reference odds
    • Under 0.511% probability@10.00BetssonEV+10%reference odds
    • Under 0.511% probability@10.00NordicbetEV+10%reference odds
    Bookmaker1 · BromleyX2 · Cambridge United
    Betsafe2.653.302.52
    Betsson2.653.302.52
    Nordicbet2.653.302.52

    Odds updated 19 Aug, 07:36

    Odds movement

    Market signal

    The market has moved clearly towards an Cambridge United win since 15 August — the odds have shortened from 2.75 to 2.52 (−8%).

    1+8 %
    40 %30 %

    2.452.65

    X+3 %
    34 %24 %

    3.203.30

    2-8 %
    41 %31 %

    2.752.52

    Over 2,50 %
    51 %41 %

    2.022.02

    Betsson · 14 recorded price levels · 15/08/2026 → 19/08/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points

    Statistics

    xG & xGA per match — 3-game rolling average

    Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).

    Bromley
    Cambridge United
    When goals are scored and conceded 2026
    Bromley (10)
    Cambridge United (32)
    Pass networks

    Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.

    Bromley
    Marcus Ifill: 18 passningar, xT 0.03IfillShamal Tyrell George: 18 passningar, xT 0.09GeorgeJacob Mendy Mendy: 13 passningar, xT 0.01MendyMitchell Bernard Pinnock: 12 passningar, xT 0.3PinnockBen Thompson: 12 passningar, xT 0.01ThompsonWilliam Mbongo Desire Hondermarck: 11 passningar, xT 0.05HondermarckKamil Amadu Conteh: 10 passningar, xT 0.01ContehKamarl Grant: 7 passningar, xT 0GrantEthon Emmanuel Archer: 5 passningar, xT 0ArcherCorey Whitely: 4 passningar, xT -0.01WhitelyJohn Joshua McKiernan: 4 passningar, xT 0McKiernan
    Cambridge United
    Callum Perry: 27 passningar, xT 0.08PerryMamadou Ousmane Jobe: 24 passningar, xT 0.33JobeDominic Martin Ball: 23 passningar, xT 0.04BallShane Mcloughlin: 20 passningar, xT 0.04McloughlinKelland John William James Watts: 20 passningar, xT 0.17WattsLiam Dennis Bennett: 15 passningar, xT 0.01BennettJake Eastwood: 14 passningar, xT 0.02EastwoodBenjamin Leo Knight: 14 passningar, xT 0.17KnightIsaac Heath: 9 passningar, xT 0HeathLouis George Pierre Appéré: 9 passningar, xT -0.03AppéréZak Dominic Bradshaw: 6 passningar, xT 0Bradshaw
    xT networks

    The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.

    Bromley
    Marcus Ifill: 18 passningar, xT 0.03IfillShamal Tyrell George: 18 passningar, xT 0.09GeorgeJacob Mendy Mendy: 13 passningar, xT 0.01MendyMitchell Bernard Pinnock: 12 passningar, xT 0.3PinnockBen Thompson: 12 passningar, xT 0.01ThompsonWilliam Mbongo Desire Hondermarck: 11 passningar, xT 0.05HondermarckKamil Amadu Conteh: 10 passningar, xT 0.01ContehKamarl Grant: 7 passningar, xT 0GrantEthon Emmanuel Archer: 5 passningar, xT 0ArcherCorey Whitely: 4 passningar, xT -0.01WhitelyJohn Joshua McKiernan: 4 passningar, xT 0McKiernan
    Cambridge United
    Callum Perry: 27 passningar, xT 0.08PerryMamadou Ousmane Jobe: 24 passningar, xT 0.33JobeDominic Martin Ball: 23 passningar, xT 0.04BallShane Mcloughlin: 20 passningar, xT 0.04McloughlinKelland John William James Watts: 20 passningar, xT 0.17WattsLiam Dennis Bennett: 15 passningar, xT 0.01BennettJake Eastwood: 14 passningar, xT 0.02EastwoodBenjamin Leo Knight: 14 passningar, xT 0.17KnightIsaac Heath: 9 passningar, xT 0HeathLouis George Pierre Appéré: 9 passningar, xT -0.03AppéréZak Dominic Bradshaw: 6 passningar, xT 0Bradshaw

    The teams in numbers

    PerformanceBromleyCambridge United
    Points33
    xPoints1.52.2
    xG per match0.992.4
    xGA per match1.32.2
    xG within 8s of winning the ball0.430.07
    xGA within 8s of losing the ball0.290.06
    Playing styleBromleyCambridge United
    Build-up efficiency0.380.36
    Field tilt0.340.32
    xT per match0.520.69
    xTA per match1.11.5
    Won balls, offensive half2531
    Pressing intensity0.270.26
    Pressing efficiency0.410.22
    Pressing efficiency, offensive half0.310.17
    Entries into the box per match910
    Entries into the box against1718
    Pass completion %0.520.61
    Pass completion % under pressure0.360.65
    Passes per match120196
    Passes against per match304480
    Switches of play per match13.519.6
    Long balls per match3333
    Set piecesBromleyCambridge United
    xG from free kicks00.08
    Corners per match1.98.3
    Corners against per match11.65.2
    xG per corner0.010.02
    xGA per corner against0.020.1
    First touch, offensive corners %0.50.38
    First touch, defensive corners %0.420.8
    OtherBromleyCambridge United
    Throw-in control0.770.83
    The goalkeepersShamal Tyrell George (Bromley)Jake Eastwood (Cambridge United)
    Saves83
    Save %100%60%
    xG prevented100%44%
    Claims0 (0%)0 (0%)

    Frequently asked questions

    Who wins Bromley vs Cambridge United according to our model?

    The model gives Cambridge United a 37% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Bromley 35%, draw 28%, Cambridge United 37%.

    What is the most likely scoreline?

    The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 14% probability.

    Over or under 2.5 goals?

    The model rates over 2.5 goals at 39% and under at 61%.

    Will both teams score?

    The probability of both teams scoring is 46% according to the model.

    Why are some legs locked in the bet builder?

    The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.

    More matches in the league

    Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.