01 · 2 legs
Safe
- York City to win55%
- Over 1.5 goals76%
EFL League TwoLNER Community Stadium, York17°4,5 mm19 km/h
Läs på svenskaErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
TEXT: York City's defensive stability, underscored by their xGA of 1.3 per match, sets the tone for their clash against Exeter City. This defensive edge, combined with their higher probability of winning at 55%, makes York the favorites. However, Exeter's slightly superior xG of 1.8 suggests they have the attacking firepower to challenge York's backline, despite the visitors' lower overall win probability of 20%.
The expected goal figures—York at 1.76 versus Exeter's 0.95—paint a picture of a match where the hosts will likely control possession and find the net. This is more about current form and tactical execution. York City has managed to gather more points, albeit with a lower xPoints than Exeter, reflecting their ability to convert chances into tangible results.
The model suggests that a 1-1 or a 1-0 outcome is equally plausible at 11%, with a 2-0 win for York also on the cards at 10%. The rain in the forecast could add an unpredictable element to the game. It’s telling that both the likelihood of over 2.5 goals and both teams finding the net hover around 51%, pointing to a finely balanced contest.
Given York's defensive prowess and favorable model lean, leaning towards York City to edge out Exeter, likely with a 1-0 scoreline, seems the prudent choice.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
| Bookmaker | 1 · York City | X | 2 · Exeter City |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 1.70 | 3.60 | 4.65 |
| Betsson | 1.70 | 3.60 | 4.65 |
| Nordicbet | 1.70 | 3.60 | 4.65 |
| Pinnacle | 1.65 | 3.99 | 4.62 |
Odds updated 26 Aug, 06:36
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards a York City win since 23 August — the odds have shortened from 1.78 to 1.65 (−7%).
1.78 → 1.65
3.66 → 3.99
4.28 → 4.62
1.85 → 1.80
Pinnacle · 4 recorded price levels · 23/08/2026 → 26/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | York City | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 3 |
| xPoints | 2.1 | 3.4 |
| xG per match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| xGA per match | 1.3 | 1.6 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.18 | 0.35 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.17 | 0.35 |
| Playing style | York City | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.43 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.66 | 0.37 |
| xT per match | 1.4 | 0.82 |
| xTA per match | 0.77 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 18 | 36 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.2 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.39 | 0.38 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.52 | 0.3 |
| Entries into the box per match | 16 | 10 |
| Entries into the box against | 8 | 17 |
| Pass completion % | 0.78 | 0.57 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.73 | 0.57 |
| Passes per match | 459 | 200 |
| Passes against per match | 202 | 319 |
| Switches of play per match | 28.5 | 11.8 |
| Long balls per match | 32 | 34 |
| Set pieces | York City | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0.06 |
| Corners per match | 8.1 | 6.2 |
| Corners against per match | 5.6 | 3.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.06 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.31 | 0.33 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.73 | 0.43 |
| Other | York City | Exeter City |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.8 | 0.67 |
| The goalkeepers | Zak Robert Johnson (York City) | Jack Joseph Fitzwater (Exeter City) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 4 | 7 |
| Save % | 100% | 100% |
| xG prevented | 100% | 100% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives York City a 55% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: York City 55%, draw 25%, Exeter City 20%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 51% and under at 49%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 51% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.