01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Osnabrück to win48%
- Over 1.5 goals77%
2. BundesligaBremer Brücke, Osnabrück22°11 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · How the predictions work
Numbers speak louder than words in the world of football, and the numbers here paint a vivid picture: VfL Osnabruck holds the upper hand against 1. FC Magdeburg. A 48% model-backed win probability and a favorable xPoints comparison (1.2 to 0.2) suggest the hosts will be looking to assert their dominance. With the possession-based approach of Osnabruck clashing against the counter-attacking style of Magdeburg, an intriguing tactical battle is on the cards, but it seems the home side has more tools in their kit.
VfL Osnabruck has a clear advantage in expected goals metrics, boasting 2.0 xG per match compared to Magdeburg’s 0.71. This gap in offensive firepower suggests Osnabruck is better equipped to make the most of their chances. The model hints at a 1-0 or 2-1 scoreline with a 10% and 9% probability, respectively, reinforcing the expectation of a narrow win for Osnabruck. Despite the defensive vulnerabilities seen in Osnabruck’s xGA of 2.6, Magdeburg’s own defensive frailties (xGA of 3.2) could prove even more costly.
1. FC Magdeburg’s slight edge in xG within eight seconds of winning the ball highlights their potency on the counter. Yet, with Osnabruck’s ability to control possession, the visitors' opportunities may be limited. The chance of both teams finding the back of the net sits at 56%, hinting at an end-to-end affair, albeit one likely tilted in favor of the hosts.
The over/under 2.5 goals metric leans slightly towards over at 53%, suggesting a modest scoring affair. However, the expected tightness of the contest and Osnabruck’s controlled style might see the under 2.5 goals offering a touch more value for punters.
Now, for those with an eye on the odds, Bet365 lists Osnabruck at 1.90 to win, which could be seen as a value bet given the model's lean. While no result is ever guaranteed, data-driven bettors could be tempted by the edge Osnabruck seems set to hold.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Osnabrück | X | 2 · Magdeburg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betfair Exchange | EV+ 16% 2.44 | EV+ 5% 3.80 | 2.72 |
| Betsafe | EV+ 20% 2.52 | 3.45 | 2.52 |
| Betsson | EV+ 20% 2.52 | 3.45 | 2.52 |
| Nordicbet | EV+ 20% 2.52 | 3.45 | 2.52 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 23% 2.57 | EV+ 4% 3.78 | 2.53 |
Odds updated 13 Aug, 14:23
2.42 → 2.57
3.81 → 3.78
2.68 → 2.53
Pinnacle · 5 recorded price levels · 11/08/2026 → 13/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Osnabrück | Magdeburg |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0 | 0 |
| xPoints | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| xG per match | 2 | 0.71 |
| xGA per match | 2.6 | 3.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.11 | 0.26 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.64 | 0.66 |
| Playing style | Osnabrück | Magdeburg |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.32 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.48 | 0.23 |
| xT per match | 0.94 | 0.97 |
| xTA per match | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 23 | 15 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.23 | 0.24 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.29 | 0.28 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.23 | 0.2 |
| Entries into the box per match | 15 | 6 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 13 |
| Pass completion % | 0.67 | 0.79 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.6 | 0.73 |
| Passes per match | 299 | 368 |
| Passes against per match | 379 | 432 |
| Switches of play per match | 14.8 | 34.2 |
| Long balls per match | 36 | 41 |
| Set pieces | Osnabrück | Magdeburg |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 5.9 | 4.9 |
| Corners against per match | 4 | 4.9 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.01 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.8 |
| Other | Osnabrück | Magdeburg |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.82 | 0.85 |
| The goalkeepers | Jannik Muller (Osnabrück) | Dominik Reimann (Magdeburg) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2 | 7 |
| Save % | 100% | 54% |
| xG prevented | 100% | 41% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Osnabrück a 48% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Osnabrück 48%, draw 28%, Magdeburg 25%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 53% and under at 47%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 56% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.