01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Nordic United or draw (X2)63%
- Over 1.5 goals82%
Swedish SuperettanDomnarvsvallen, Borlänge13°17,4 mm7 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Nordic United FC's unbeaten streak of seven league matches stands out. With a slight edge in expected goals per match (1.5 vs. 1.4) and lower expected goals against (1.2 vs. 1.4), the visitors seem poised to maintain their form against Brage, despite the home side's possession-based strategy. The model gives Nordic United a 39% chance of winning, just slightly higher than Brage's 37%, suggesting a tight contest.
The most likely scoreline is a 1-1 draw at 11%, but the potential for goals is significant with a 60% probability for over 2.5 goals and a 62% chance for both teams to score. Heavy rain might dampen the goal tally slightly, yet this is already accounted for in the model's outlook. Brage’s tendency to control possession could be disrupted by Nordic United's counter-attacking and crossing approach, making the visitors' slight edge in performance metrics crucial.
For bettors eyeing value, Nordic United offers promising odds. With Betsafe, Betsson, and Nordicbet all offering 2.65 for an away win, there’s a 2% edge according to the model's 39% probability. This makes backing Nordic United at those odds a compelling option for those seeking value.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Brage | X | 2 · Nordic United |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.46 | 3.58 | EV+ 2% 2.65 |
| Betsson | 2.46 | 3.58 | EV+ 2% 2.65 |
| Nordicbet | 2.46 | 3.58 | EV+ 2% 2.65 |
Odds updated 18 Aug, 15:36
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards an Nordic United win since 16 August — the odds have shortened from 2.95 to 2.65 (−10%).
2.19 → 2.46
3.73 → 3.58
2.95 → 2.65
Betsson · 5 recorded price levels · 16/08/2026 → 18/08/2026 · fixed scale 10 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Superettan data since 2024.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Brage | Nordic United |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 21 | 29 |
| xPoints | 26.2 | 30 |
| xG per match | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| xGA per match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.38 | 0.31 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.34 | 0.28 |
| Playing style | Brage | Nordic United |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.35 | 0.37 |
| Field tilt | 0.48 | 0.51 |
| xT per match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| xTA per match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 31 | 29 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.55 | 0.54 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.27 | 0.25 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.28 | 0.27 |
| Entries into the box per match | 15 | 18 |
| Entries into the box against | 17 | 14 |
| Pass completion % | 0.77 | 0.78 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.71 | 0.74 |
| Passes per match | 340 | 363 |
| Passes against per match | 362 | 410 |
| Switches of play per match | 18.4 | 17.9 |
| Long balls per match | 33 | 31 |
| Set pieces | Brage | Nordic United |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Corners per match | 5.2 | 4.2 |
| Corners against per match | 5.4 | 4.8 |
| xG per corner | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.51 | 0.54 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.56 | 0.6 |
| Other | Brage | Nordic United |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.55 | 0.54 |
| The goalkeepers | Viktor Frodig (Brage) | William Eskelinen (Nordic United) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 52 | 36 |
| Save % | 63% | 63% |
| xG prevented | 45% | 41% |
| Claims | 120 (97%) | 86 (95%) |
The model gives Nordic United a 39% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Brage 37%, draw 25%, Nordic United 39%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 60% and under at 40%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 62% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.