01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Double chance Boluspor or draw (1X)75%
- Over 1.5 goals82%
Turkish 1. Lig22°8 km/h
Läs på svenskaAnna Karlsson · · A data-driven preview · How the predictions work
Boluspor stand at zero points, a stark contrast to Mardin 1969's four — but the model doesn't seem to care. Boluspor are pegged as slight favorites at 41% probability to win, a curious stance driven more by home advantage than current form. Their expected goals (1.87) suggest they might finally find the back of the net, a task they've struggled with given their paltry xG per match of 0.55.
Mardin 1969, with their balanced and physical style, have shown early-season promise, especially defensively. They boast an xGA per match of just 0.75, indicating a robust backline that's unlikely to be easily breached. Their offensive production is no slouch either, with an xG per match of 1.8, quite the contrast to Boluspor’s struggles. Despite this, the model sees a tight affair, with Boluspor’s direct style potentially unsettling Mardin’s defence.
The weather, if inclement, could indeed put a dampener on goals, but with an over 2.5 goals probability sitting at 60%, there's statistical support for a lively encounter. A 1-1 draw (11%) emerges as the most likely scoreline, underscoring the model's tilt towards a tight contest. Yet Mardin’s superior xPoints (3.4) and xG figures make them appealing, even if the model leans slightly towards Boluspor on home soil.
Despite the limited head-to-head sample size, the numbers paint a picture of Mardin 1969 having the upper hand. The price of 2.70 from Pinnacle on Mardin 1969 to win could be where value resides, given their statistical edge in nearly every department except the whims of the model. This isn’t a guarantee but a sharp angle worth considering for those looking to back underdogs with substance.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Boluspor | Mardin 1969 |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 0 | 4 |
| xPoints | 1.3 | 3.4 |
| xG per match | 0.55 | 1.8 |
| xGA per match | 2 | 0.75 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.2 | 0.81 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.33 | 0.07 |
| Playing style | Boluspor | Mardin 1969 |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.31 | 0.39 |
| Field tilt | 0.35 | 0.52 |
| xT per match | 0.55 | 1.4 |
| xTA per match | 0.98 | 0.59 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 15 | 21 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.2 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.28 | 0.2 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.22 | 0.19 |
| Entries into the box per match | 8 | 15 |
| Entries into the box against | 15 | 10 |
| Pass completion % | 0.67 | 0.73 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.58 | 0.71 |
| Passes per match | 217 | 298 |
| Passes against per match | 425 | 416 |
| Switches of play per match | 19.1 | 22.9 |
| Long balls per match | 29 | 24 |
| Set pieces | Boluspor | Mardin 1969 |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 2 | 6.6 |
| Corners against per match | 5.9 | 3.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.02 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0 | 0.38 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.92 | 0.71 |
| Other | Boluspor | Mardin 1969 |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.69 | 0.65 |
| The goalkeepers | Angelo Tafas (Boluspor) | Erce Kardesler (Mardin 1969) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 4 | 9 |
| Save % | 50% | 100% |
| xG prevented | 11% | 100% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Boluspor a 41% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Boluspor 41%, draw 22%, Mardin 1969 37%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 60% and under at 40%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 61% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.