01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Red Bull Salzburg to win59%
- Over 1.5 goals85%
Austrian Bundesliga14°1,7 mm10 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
TEXT: Red Bull Salzburg's 59% win probability stands out ahead of their clash with Ried. The visitors, riding a wave of three consecutive victories, have also found the net in eight straight league games, underscoring their offensive prowess. Salzburg's expected goals of 2.24 against Ried's 1.11 further highlights their attacking edge.
While Ried's model probability to win is a modest 19%, their ability to control possession could pose challenges. However, Salzburg's high press typically disrupts such strategies, as reflected in their substantial xG advantage of 3.0 per match compared to Ried's 1.7. The small sample size of head-to-heads, where neither team has dominated, adds little weight against current form and expected goals.
Looking at the betting angles, the over 2.5 goals market is implied at 65%, leaning towards a higher-scoring affair despite Ried's controlled play style. The most likely scorelines, 1-2 and 0-2, hint at Salzburg's superiority. Given these dynamics, the value might lie with Salzburg to win, a potentially profitable play considering their current form and statistical edge.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Ried | X | 2 · Red Bull Salzburg |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 4.90 | 4.05 | 1.58 |
| Betsson | 4.90 | 4.05 | 1.58 |
| Nordicbet | 4.90 | 4.05 | 1.58 |
| Pinnacle | EV+ 8% 5.57 | 4.14 | 1.56 |
Odds updated 10 Sept, 07:36
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards an Red Bull Salzburg win since 4 September — the odds have shortened from 1.68 to 1.56 (−7%).
4.84 → 5.57
3.90 → 4.14
1.68 → 1.56
Pinnacle · 9 recorded price levels · 04/09/2026 → 10/09/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Head-to-head based on Austrian Bundesliga data since 2022.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Ried | Red Bull Salzburg |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 13 |
| xPoints | 6.9 | 10.4 |
| xG per match | 1.7 | 3 |
| xGA per match | 1.5 | 1.1 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.29 | 0.46 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.34 | 0.52 |
| Playing style | Ried | Red Bull Salzburg |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.29 | 0.33 |
| Field tilt | 0.6 | 0.65 |
| xT per match | 1.1 | 1.4 |
| xTA per match | 0.93 | 0.67 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 29 | 28 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.26 | 0.3 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.22 | 0.26 |
| Entries into the box per match | 14 | 14 |
| Entries into the box against | 11 | 9 |
| Pass completion % | 0.76 | 0.85 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.69 | 0.78 |
| Passes per match | 349 | 586 |
| Passes against per match | 324 | 299 |
| Switches of play per match | 22.3 | 32.7 |
| Long balls per match | 32 | 34 |
| Set pieces | Ried | Red Bull Salzburg |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.11 | 0.21 |
| Corners per match | 4.5 | 8.7 |
| Corners against per match | 4.1 | 3.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.43 | 0.3 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.52 | 0.39 |
| Other | Ried | Red Bull Salzburg |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.7 | 0.76 |
| The goalkeepers | Andreas Leitner (Ried) | Christian Zawieschitzky (Red Bull Salzburg) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 12 | 12 |
| Save % | 55% | 80% |
| xG prevented | 36% | 91% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Red Bull Salzburg a 59% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Ried 19%, draw 22%, Red Bull Salzburg 59%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-2 at 10% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 65% and under at 35%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 60% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.