01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Anderlecht to win54%
- Over 1.5 goals79%
Belgian Pro LeagueLotto Park, Bryssel15°10 km/h
Läs på svenskaOscar Nilsson · · Model-assisted analysis, fact-checked · How the predictions work
Anderlecht's possession-heavy style might face resistance against Kortrijk's low block, but the numbers suggest a clear advantage for the hosts. Anderlecht's expected goals per match stand at a robust 2.2, while their defensive solidity is highlighted by a mere 0.69 expected goals against. This contrasts sharply with Kortrijk, who struggle both in attack and defense, with an xG of only 0.74 and xGA of 2.5. Despite Kortrijk's defensive approach, they appear vulnerable to Anderlecht's high press and offensive firepower.
The head-to-head record is slim, with just four matches since 2023, showing Anderlecht leading slightly with two wins. Yet, Anderlecht's historical home win rate of 57% in 61 matches paints a more predictive picture. The model heavily leans towards Anderlecht, assigning them a 54% probability of winning, while Kortrijk's chances linger at 24%. Expected goals favor a moderate scoring affair, aligning with the model's most probable outcomes of 1-1 or 2-1.
For those seeking value, Kortrijk's win at 24% probability might intrigue at longer odds, but the smart money sides with Anderlecht. Look for a narrow home victory, possibly 2-1, with over 2.5 goals slightly favored at 56%. Keep an eye on Anderlecht to leverage their superior xG stats against a porous Kortrijk defense.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
No odds available yet.
Head-to-head based on Belgian Pro League data since 2023.
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Anderlecht | Kortrijk |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 3 | 0 |
| xPoints | 3.3 | 2.1 |
| xG per match | 2.2 | 0.74 |
| xGA per match | 0.69 | 2.5 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.24 | 0.07 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.01 | 0.4 |
| Playing style | Anderlecht | Kortrijk |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.3 | 0.28 |
| Field tilt | 0.87 | 0.25 |
| xT per match | 2.3 | 0.56 |
| xTA per match | 0.51 | 1.4 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 32 | 12 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.22 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.42 | 0.23 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.37 | 0.11 |
| Entries into the box per match | 32 | 6 |
| Entries into the box against | 10 | 15 |
| Pass completion % | 0.82 | 0.66 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.78 | 0.59 |
| Passes per match | 546 | 251 |
| Passes against per match | 223 | 529 |
| Switches of play per match | 31.8 | 11.3 |
| Long balls per match | 33 | 26 |
| Set pieces | Anderlecht | Kortrijk |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0 | 0 |
| Corners per match | 10.9 | 2.1 |
| Corners against per match | 0.99 | 8.2 |
| xG per corner | 0.02 | 0.03 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.18 | 0.06 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.81 | 0.25 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.5 | 0.44 |
| Other | Anderlecht | Kortrijk |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.8 | 0.69 |
| The goalkeepers | Colin Coosemans (Anderlecht) | Marko Ilić (Kortrijk) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 2 | 9 |
| Save % | 50% | 60% |
| xG prevented | 48% | 24% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Anderlecht a 54% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Anderlecht 54%, draw 22%, Kortrijk 24%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 11% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 56% and under at 44%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 57% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.