01 · 2 legs
Safe
- Beveren to win45%
- Over 1.5 goals78%
Belgian Pro LeagueRegenboogstadion, Waregem15°2,0 mm13 km/h
Läs på svenska
BeverenBalanced & physicalErik Lindberg · · Written from the model's numbers · How the predictions work
SK Beveren enters this clash with a 45% winning probability, but don't let that fool you into thinking it's a walkover. Zulte Waregem is on a resilient nine-match unbeaten streak in the league, a testament to their fortitude and strategic possession play. The numbers tilt slightly towards Beveren's favour, but there's a delicious tension between model expectations and Zulte's recent history of bending but not breaking.
Zulte Waregem emerges from the statistical shadows with an edge in both points and expected metrics. They've secured 4 points to Beveren's 3 and boast a superior xPoints tally of 3.1 against Beveren's 1.8. Their defensive solidity is evident, conceding an xGA of just 0.86 per match, significantly better than Beveren's porous 2.3. Yet, the expected goals across this fixture nudge slightly higher for Beveren at 1.58 compared to Zulte's 1.27, suggesting the visitors might exploit their physical edge to create more scoring chances.
Zulte Waregem, with their control-oriented style, might find the going tough against Beveren's balanced, physical approach. While Zulte's xG per match sits at 0.94, their unbeaten streak suggests they are adept at converting fewer chances into decisive moments. With the most likely scorelines of 1-1 and 0-1 hovering in the 9% range, and a slightly higher chance for a 1-2 at 9%, the match could swing on fine margins.
The over 2.5 goals line sits at 54%, hinting at an open encounter, but with Zulte's defensive acumen and Beveren's inconsistency, there's a case for the under if the weather plays its part. Yet, with a 57% chance for both teams to score, the smart money might see value in a tight, goal-shy contest, with the draw holding a tantalizing 27% probability.
Highlighting the sharpest angle, SK Beveren to win at 2.10 with a bookmaker presents value, given their higher probability. But with Zulte's unbeaten streak in mind, punters might find comfort in betting on a close-run affair—perhaps leaning towards a 1-1 draw as a safer hedge.
01 · 2 legs
02 · 3 legs
03 · 4 legs
Bets where the model's probability beats what the odds imply (EV+).
| Bookmaker | 1 · Zulte Waregem | X | 2 · Beveren |
|---|---|---|---|
| Betsafe | 2.05 | 3.45 | EV+ 54% 3.40 |
| Betsson | 2.05 | 3.45 | EV+ 54% 3.40 |
| Nordicbet | 2.05 | 3.45 | EV+ 54% 3.40 |
Odds updated 19 Aug, 15:36
Market signal
The market has moved clearly towards an Beveren win since 17 August — the odds have shortened from 3.90 to 3.40 (−13%).
1.92 → 2.05
3.45 → 3.45
3.90 → 3.40
1.90 → 1.83
Betsson · 12 recorded price levels · 17/08/2026 → 19/08/2026 · fixed scale 5 percentage points
Solid line = created (xG), dashed = conceded (xGA).
Last 5 matches. Circle size = pass volume, line width = combinations between players. Attacking left to right.
The same network weighted by offensive threat (xT): circle size = threat created by the player, line width = threat of the combinations. Last 5 matches, attacking left to right.
| Performance | Zulte Waregem | Beveren |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 4 | 3 |
| xPoints | 3.1 | 1.8 |
| xG per match | 0.94 | 0.74 |
| xGA per match | 0.86 | 2.3 |
| xG within 8s of winning the ball | 0.15 | 0.07 |
| xGA within 8s of losing the ball | 0.06 | 0.19 |
| Playing style | Zulte Waregem | Beveren |
|---|---|---|
| Build-up efficiency | 0.34 | 0.31 |
| Field tilt | 0.36 | 0.32 |
| xT per match | 0.63 | 0.67 |
| xTA per match | 1.3 | 2.1 |
| Won balls, offensive half | 28 | 30 |
| Pressing intensity | 0.24 | 0.26 |
| Pressing efficiency | 0.2 | 0.27 |
| Pressing efficiency, offensive half | 0.12 | 0.21 |
| Entries into the box per match | 12 | 12 |
| Entries into the box against | 13 | 24 |
| Pass completion % | 0.7 | 0.72 |
| Pass completion % under pressure | 0.63 | 0.69 |
| Passes per match | 237 | 343 |
| Passes against per match | 499 | 441 |
| Switches of play per match | 15.4 | 23.7 |
| Long balls per match | 28 | 38 |
| Set pieces | Zulte Waregem | Beveren |
|---|---|---|
| xG from free kicks | 0.29 | 0.03 |
| Corners per match | 4.5 | 2 |
| Corners against per match | 6 | 8.6 |
| xG per corner | 0.01 | 0.04 |
| xGA per corner against | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| First touch, offensive corners % | 0.44 | 0.5 |
| First touch, defensive corners % | 0.58 | 0.38 |
| Other | Zulte Waregem | Beveren |
|---|---|---|
| Throw-in control | 0.73 | 0.73 |
| The goalkeepers | Louis Bostyn (Zulte Waregem) | Johannes Schenk (Beveren) |
|---|---|---|
| Saves | 5 | 13 |
| Save % | 83% | 87% |
| xG prevented | 83% | 36% |
| Claims | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
The model gives Beveren a 45% win probability. Full 1X2 picture: Zulte Waregem 28%, draw 27%, Beveren 45%.
The model's most likely final score is 1-1 at 12% probability.
The model rates over 2.5 goals at 54% and under at 46%.
The probability of both teams scoring is 57% according to the model.
The same rules as the bookmakers’ builders: legs that contradict or already follow from your slip cannot be combined — for example correct score 2–1 with under 2.5 goals. The difference is that we don’t look the rules up in a table; we compute them straight from the score matrix.
Predictions come from PlaymakerAI's match model and reflect the model's assessment — not betting advice. Gamble responsibly.